linux-mm.kvack.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Alexei Starovoitov <alexei.starovoitov@gmail.com>
To: davem@davemloft.net
Cc: daniel@iogearbox.net, andrii@kernel.org, tj@kernel.org,
	memxor@gmail.com, delyank@fb.com, linux-mm@kvack.org,
	bpf@vger.kernel.org, kernel-team@fb.com
Subject: [PATCH v6 bpf-next 05/16] bpf: Relax the requirement to use preallocated hash maps in tracing progs.
Date: Fri,  2 Sep 2022 14:10:47 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20220902211058.60789-6-alexei.starovoitov@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20220902211058.60789-1-alexei.starovoitov@gmail.com>

From: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>

Since bpf hash map was converted to use bpf_mem_alloc it is safe to use
from tracing programs and in RT kernels.
But per-cpu hash map is still using dynamic allocation for per-cpu map
values, hence keep the warning for this map type.
In the future alloc_percpu_gfp can be front-end-ed with bpf_mem_cache
and this restriction will be completely lifted.
perf_event (NMI) bpf programs have to use preallocated hash maps,
because free_htab_elem() is using call_rcu which might crash if re-entered.

Sleepable bpf programs have to use preallocated hash maps, because
life time of the map elements is not protected by rcu_read_lock/unlock.
This restriction can be lifted in the future as well.

Acked-by: Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi <memxor@gmail.com>
Acked-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
---
 kernel/bpf/verifier.c | 31 ++++++++++++++++++++++---------
 1 file changed, 22 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)

diff --git a/kernel/bpf/verifier.c b/kernel/bpf/verifier.c
index 0194a36d0b36..3dce3166855f 100644
--- a/kernel/bpf/verifier.c
+++ b/kernel/bpf/verifier.c
@@ -12629,10 +12629,12 @@ static int check_map_prog_compatibility(struct bpf_verifier_env *env,
 	 * For programs attached to PERF events this is mandatory as the
 	 * perf NMI can hit any arbitrary code sequence.
 	 *
-	 * All other trace types using preallocated hash maps are unsafe as
-	 * well because tracepoint or kprobes can be inside locked regions
-	 * of the memory allocator or at a place where a recursion into the
-	 * memory allocator would see inconsistent state.
+	 * All other trace types using non-preallocated per-cpu hash maps are
+	 * unsafe as well because tracepoint or kprobes can be inside locked
+	 * regions of the per-cpu memory allocator or at a place where a
+	 * recursion into the per-cpu memory allocator would see inconsistent
+	 * state. Non per-cpu hash maps are using bpf_mem_alloc-tor which is
+	 * safe to use from kprobe/fentry and in RT.
 	 *
 	 * On RT enabled kernels run-time allocation of all trace type
 	 * programs is strictly prohibited due to lock type constraints. On
@@ -12642,15 +12644,26 @@ static int check_map_prog_compatibility(struct bpf_verifier_env *env,
 	 */
 	if (is_tracing_prog_type(prog_type) && !is_preallocated_map(map)) {
 		if (prog_type == BPF_PROG_TYPE_PERF_EVENT) {
+			/* perf_event bpf progs have to use preallocated hash maps
+			 * because non-prealloc is still relying on call_rcu to free
+			 * elements.
+			 */
 			verbose(env, "perf_event programs can only use preallocated hash map\n");
 			return -EINVAL;
 		}
-		if (IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_PREEMPT_RT)) {
-			verbose(env, "trace type programs can only use preallocated hash map\n");
-			return -EINVAL;
+		if (map->map_type == BPF_MAP_TYPE_PERCPU_HASH ||
+		    (map->inner_map_meta &&
+		     map->inner_map_meta->map_type == BPF_MAP_TYPE_PERCPU_HASH)) {
+			if (IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_PREEMPT_RT)) {
+				verbose(env,
+					"trace type programs can only use preallocated per-cpu hash map\n");
+				return -EINVAL;
+			}
+			WARN_ONCE(1, "trace type BPF program uses run-time allocation\n");
+			verbose(env,
+				"trace type programs with run-time allocated per-cpu hash maps are unsafe."
+				" Switch to preallocated hash maps.\n");
 		}
-		WARN_ONCE(1, "trace type BPF program uses run-time allocation\n");
-		verbose(env, "trace type programs with run-time allocated hash maps are unsafe. Switch to preallocated hash maps.\n");
 	}
 
 	if (map_value_has_spin_lock(map)) {
-- 
2.30.2



  parent reply	other threads:[~2022-09-02 21:11 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 18+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2022-09-02 21:10 [PATCH v6 bpf-next 00/16] bpf: BPF specific memory allocator Alexei Starovoitov
2022-09-02 21:10 ` [PATCH v6 bpf-next 01/16] bpf: Introduce any context " Alexei Starovoitov
2022-09-02 21:10 ` [PATCH v6 bpf-next 02/16] bpf: Convert hash map to bpf_mem_alloc Alexei Starovoitov
2022-09-02 21:10 ` [PATCH v6 bpf-next 03/16] selftests/bpf: Improve test coverage of test_maps Alexei Starovoitov
2022-09-02 21:10 ` [PATCH v6 bpf-next 04/16] samples/bpf: Reduce syscall overhead in map_perf_test Alexei Starovoitov
2022-09-02 21:10 ` Alexei Starovoitov [this message]
2022-09-02 21:10 ` [PATCH v6 bpf-next 06/16] bpf: Optimize element count in non-preallocated hash map Alexei Starovoitov
2022-09-02 21:10 ` [PATCH v6 bpf-next 07/16] bpf: Optimize call_rcu " Alexei Starovoitov
2022-09-02 21:10 ` [PATCH v6 bpf-next 08/16] bpf: Adjust low/high watermarks in bpf_mem_cache Alexei Starovoitov
2022-09-02 21:10 ` [PATCH v6 bpf-next 09/16] bpf: Batch call_rcu callbacks instead of SLAB_TYPESAFE_BY_RCU Alexei Starovoitov
2022-09-02 21:10 ` [PATCH v6 bpf-next 10/16] bpf: Add percpu allocation support to bpf_mem_alloc Alexei Starovoitov
2022-09-02 21:10 ` [PATCH v6 bpf-next 11/16] bpf: Convert percpu hash map to per-cpu bpf_mem_alloc Alexei Starovoitov
2022-09-02 21:10 ` [PATCH v6 bpf-next 12/16] bpf: Remove tracing program restriction on map types Alexei Starovoitov
2022-09-02 21:10 ` [PATCH v6 bpf-next 13/16] bpf: Prepare bpf_mem_alloc to be used by sleepable bpf programs Alexei Starovoitov
2022-09-02 21:10 ` [PATCH v6 bpf-next 14/16] bpf: Remove prealloc-only restriction for " Alexei Starovoitov
2022-09-02 21:10 ` [PATCH v6 bpf-next 15/16] bpf: Remove usage of kmem_cache from bpf_mem_cache Alexei Starovoitov
2022-09-02 21:10 ` [PATCH v6 bpf-next 16/16] bpf: Optimize rcu_barrier usage between hash map and bpf_mem_alloc Alexei Starovoitov
2022-09-05 13:50 ` [PATCH v6 bpf-next 00/16] bpf: BPF specific memory allocator patchwork-bot+netdevbpf

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20220902211058.60789-6-alexei.starovoitov@gmail.com \
    --to=alexei.starovoitov@gmail.com \
    --cc=andrii@kernel.org \
    --cc=bpf@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=daniel@iogearbox.net \
    --cc=davem@davemloft.net \
    --cc=delyank@fb.com \
    --cc=kernel-team@fb.com \
    --cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
    --cc=memxor@gmail.com \
    --cc=tj@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox