linux-mm.kvack.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Alexei Starovoitov <alexei.starovoitov@gmail.com>
To: davem@davemloft.net
Cc: daniel@iogearbox.net, andrii@kernel.org, tj@kernel.org,
	memxor@gmail.com, delyank@fb.com, linux-mm@kvack.org,
	bpf@vger.kernel.org, kernel-team@fb.com
Subject: [PATCH v6 bpf-next 15/16] bpf: Remove usage of kmem_cache from bpf_mem_cache.
Date: Fri,  2 Sep 2022 14:10:57 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20220902211058.60789-16-alexei.starovoitov@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20220902211058.60789-1-alexei.starovoitov@gmail.com>

From: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>

For bpf_mem_cache based hash maps the following stress test:
for (i = 1; i <= 512; i <<= 1)
  for (j = 1; j <= 1 << 18; j <<= 1)
    fd = bpf_map_create(BPF_MAP_TYPE_HASH, NULL, i, j, 2, 0);
creates many kmem_cache-s that are not mergeable in debug kernels
and consume unnecessary amount of memory.
Turned out bpf_mem_cache's free_list logic does batching well,
so usage of kmem_cache for fixes size allocations doesn't bring
any performance benefits vs normal kmalloc.
Hence get rid of kmem_cache in bpf_mem_cache.
That saves memory, speeds up map create/destroy operations,
while maintains hash map update/delete performance.

Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
---
 kernel/bpf/memalloc.c | 50 ++++++++++++-------------------------------
 1 file changed, 14 insertions(+), 36 deletions(-)

diff --git a/kernel/bpf/memalloc.c b/kernel/bpf/memalloc.c
index 8895c016dcdb..38fbd15c130a 100644
--- a/kernel/bpf/memalloc.c
+++ b/kernel/bpf/memalloc.c
@@ -91,17 +91,13 @@ struct bpf_mem_cache {
 	 */
 	struct llist_head free_llist_extra;
 
-	/* kmem_cache != NULL when bpf_mem_alloc was created for specific
-	 * element size.
-	 */
-	struct kmem_cache *kmem_cache;
 	struct irq_work refill_work;
 	struct obj_cgroup *objcg;
 	int unit_size;
 	/* count of objects in free_llist */
 	int free_cnt;
 	int low_watermark, high_watermark, batch;
-	bool percpu;
+	int percpu_size;
 
 	struct rcu_head rcu;
 	struct llist_head free_by_rcu;
@@ -134,8 +130,8 @@ static void *__alloc(struct bpf_mem_cache *c, int node)
 	 */
 	gfp_t flags = GFP_NOWAIT | __GFP_NOWARN | __GFP_ACCOUNT;
 
-	if (c->percpu) {
-		void **obj = kmem_cache_alloc_node(c->kmem_cache, flags, node);
+	if (c->percpu_size) {
+		void **obj = kmalloc_node(c->percpu_size, flags, node);
 		void *pptr = __alloc_percpu_gfp(c->unit_size, 8, flags);
 
 		if (!obj || !pptr) {
@@ -147,9 +143,6 @@ static void *__alloc(struct bpf_mem_cache *c, int node)
 		return obj;
 	}
 
-	if (c->kmem_cache)
-		return kmem_cache_alloc_node(c->kmem_cache, flags, node);
-
 	return kmalloc_node(c->unit_size, flags, node);
 }
 
@@ -207,16 +200,13 @@ static void alloc_bulk(struct bpf_mem_cache *c, int cnt, int node)
 
 static void free_one(struct bpf_mem_cache *c, void *obj)
 {
-	if (c->percpu) {
+	if (c->percpu_size) {
 		free_percpu(((void **)obj)[1]);
-		kmem_cache_free(c->kmem_cache, obj);
+		kfree(obj);
 		return;
 	}
 
-	if (c->kmem_cache)
-		kmem_cache_free(c->kmem_cache, obj);
-	else
-		kfree(obj);
+	kfree(obj);
 }
 
 static void __free_rcu(struct rcu_head *head)
@@ -356,7 +346,7 @@ static void prefill_mem_cache(struct bpf_mem_cache *c, int cpu)
 	alloc_bulk(c, c->unit_size <= 256 ? 4 : 1, cpu_to_node(cpu));
 }
 
-/* When size != 0 create kmem_cache and bpf_mem_cache for each cpu.
+/* When size != 0 bpf_mem_cache for each cpu.
  * This is typical bpf hash map use case when all elements have equal size.
  *
  * When size == 0 allocate 11 bpf_mem_cache-s for each cpu, then rely on
@@ -368,40 +358,29 @@ int bpf_mem_alloc_init(struct bpf_mem_alloc *ma, int size, bool percpu)
 	static u16 sizes[NUM_CACHES] = {96, 192, 16, 32, 64, 128, 256, 512, 1024, 2048, 4096};
 	struct bpf_mem_caches *cc, __percpu *pcc;
 	struct bpf_mem_cache *c, __percpu *pc;
-	struct kmem_cache *kmem_cache = NULL;
 	struct obj_cgroup *objcg = NULL;
-	char buf[32];
-	int cpu, i, unit_size;
+	int cpu, i, unit_size, percpu_size = 0;
 
 	if (size) {
 		pc = __alloc_percpu_gfp(sizeof(*pc), 8, GFP_KERNEL);
 		if (!pc)
 			return -ENOMEM;
 
-		if (percpu) {
-			unit_size = size;
+		if (percpu)
 			/* room for llist_node and per-cpu pointer */
-			size = LLIST_NODE_SZ + sizeof(void *);
-		} else {
+			percpu_size = LLIST_NODE_SZ + sizeof(void *);
+		else
 			size += LLIST_NODE_SZ; /* room for llist_node */
-			unit_size = size;
-		}
+		unit_size = size;
 
-		snprintf(buf, sizeof(buf), "bpf-%u", size);
-		kmem_cache = kmem_cache_create(buf, size, 8, 0, NULL);
-		if (!kmem_cache) {
-			free_percpu(pc);
-			return -ENOMEM;
-		}
 #ifdef CONFIG_MEMCG_KMEM
 		objcg = get_obj_cgroup_from_current();
 #endif
 		for_each_possible_cpu(cpu) {
 			c = per_cpu_ptr(pc, cpu);
-			c->kmem_cache = kmem_cache;
 			c->unit_size = unit_size;
 			c->objcg = objcg;
-			c->percpu = percpu;
+			c->percpu_size = percpu_size;
 			prefill_mem_cache(c, cpu);
 		}
 		ma->cache = pc;
@@ -461,8 +440,7 @@ void bpf_mem_alloc_destroy(struct bpf_mem_alloc *ma)
 			c = per_cpu_ptr(ma->cache, cpu);
 			drain_mem_cache(c);
 		}
-		/* kmem_cache and memcg are the same across cpus */
-		kmem_cache_destroy(c->kmem_cache);
+		/* objcg is the same across cpus */
 		if (c->objcg)
 			obj_cgroup_put(c->objcg);
 		/* c->waiting_for_gp list was drained, but __free_rcu might
-- 
2.30.2



  parent reply	other threads:[~2022-09-02 21:11 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 18+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2022-09-02 21:10 [PATCH v6 bpf-next 00/16] bpf: BPF specific memory allocator Alexei Starovoitov
2022-09-02 21:10 ` [PATCH v6 bpf-next 01/16] bpf: Introduce any context " Alexei Starovoitov
2022-09-02 21:10 ` [PATCH v6 bpf-next 02/16] bpf: Convert hash map to bpf_mem_alloc Alexei Starovoitov
2022-09-02 21:10 ` [PATCH v6 bpf-next 03/16] selftests/bpf: Improve test coverage of test_maps Alexei Starovoitov
2022-09-02 21:10 ` [PATCH v6 bpf-next 04/16] samples/bpf: Reduce syscall overhead in map_perf_test Alexei Starovoitov
2022-09-02 21:10 ` [PATCH v6 bpf-next 05/16] bpf: Relax the requirement to use preallocated hash maps in tracing progs Alexei Starovoitov
2022-09-02 21:10 ` [PATCH v6 bpf-next 06/16] bpf: Optimize element count in non-preallocated hash map Alexei Starovoitov
2022-09-02 21:10 ` [PATCH v6 bpf-next 07/16] bpf: Optimize call_rcu " Alexei Starovoitov
2022-09-02 21:10 ` [PATCH v6 bpf-next 08/16] bpf: Adjust low/high watermarks in bpf_mem_cache Alexei Starovoitov
2022-09-02 21:10 ` [PATCH v6 bpf-next 09/16] bpf: Batch call_rcu callbacks instead of SLAB_TYPESAFE_BY_RCU Alexei Starovoitov
2022-09-02 21:10 ` [PATCH v6 bpf-next 10/16] bpf: Add percpu allocation support to bpf_mem_alloc Alexei Starovoitov
2022-09-02 21:10 ` [PATCH v6 bpf-next 11/16] bpf: Convert percpu hash map to per-cpu bpf_mem_alloc Alexei Starovoitov
2022-09-02 21:10 ` [PATCH v6 bpf-next 12/16] bpf: Remove tracing program restriction on map types Alexei Starovoitov
2022-09-02 21:10 ` [PATCH v6 bpf-next 13/16] bpf: Prepare bpf_mem_alloc to be used by sleepable bpf programs Alexei Starovoitov
2022-09-02 21:10 ` [PATCH v6 bpf-next 14/16] bpf: Remove prealloc-only restriction for " Alexei Starovoitov
2022-09-02 21:10 ` Alexei Starovoitov [this message]
2022-09-02 21:10 ` [PATCH v6 bpf-next 16/16] bpf: Optimize rcu_barrier usage between hash map and bpf_mem_alloc Alexei Starovoitov
2022-09-05 13:50 ` [PATCH v6 bpf-next 00/16] bpf: BPF specific memory allocator patchwork-bot+netdevbpf

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20220902211058.60789-16-alexei.starovoitov@gmail.com \
    --to=alexei.starovoitov@gmail.com \
    --cc=andrii@kernel.org \
    --cc=bpf@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=daniel@iogearbox.net \
    --cc=davem@davemloft.net \
    --cc=delyank@fb.com \
    --cc=kernel-team@fb.com \
    --cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
    --cc=memxor@gmail.com \
    --cc=tj@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox