From: Feng Tang <feng.tang@intel.com>
To: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
Alexander Potapenko <glider@google.com>,
Marco Elver <elver@google.com>,
Dmitry Vyukov <dvyukov@google.com>,
Hyeonggon Yoo <42.hyeyoo@gmail.com>,
Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@suse.cz>,
kasan-dev@googlegroups.com, linux-mm@kvack.org
Cc: Feng Tang <feng.tang@intel.com>
Subject: [PATCH -next] mm: kence: add __kmem_cache_free to function skip list
Date: Wed, 31 Aug 2022 15:30:51 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20220831073051.3032-1-feng.tang@intel.com> (raw)
When testing the linux-next kernel, kfence's kunit test reported some
errors:
[ 12.812412] not ok 7 - test_double_free
[ 13.011968] not ok 9 - test_invalid_addr_free
[ 13.438947] not ok 11 - test_corruption
[ 18.635647] not ok 18 - test_kmalloc_aligned_oob_write
Further check shows there is the "common kmalloc" patchset from
Hyeonggon Yoo, which cleanup the kmalloc code and make a better
sharing of slab/slub. There is some function name change around it,
which was not recognized by current kfence function name handling
code, and interpreted as error.
Add new function name "__kmem_cache_free" to make it known to kfence.
Signed-off-by: Feng Tang <feng.tang@intel.com>
---
mm/kfence/report.c | 1 +
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
diff --git a/mm/kfence/report.c b/mm/kfence/report.c
index f5a6d8ba3e21..7e496856c2eb 100644
--- a/mm/kfence/report.c
+++ b/mm/kfence/report.c
@@ -86,6 +86,7 @@ static int get_stack_skipnr(const unsigned long stack_entries[], int num_entries
/* Also the *_bulk() variants by only checking prefixes. */
if (str_has_prefix(buf, ARCH_FUNC_PREFIX "kfree") ||
str_has_prefix(buf, ARCH_FUNC_PREFIX "kmem_cache_free") ||
+ str_has_prefix(buf, ARCH_FUNC_PREFIX "__kmem_cache_free") ||
str_has_prefix(buf, ARCH_FUNC_PREFIX "__kmalloc") ||
str_has_prefix(buf, ARCH_FUNC_PREFIX "kmem_cache_alloc"))
goto found;
--
2.27.0
next reply other threads:[~2022-08-31 7:30 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2022-08-31 7:30 Feng Tang [this message]
2022-08-31 7:35 ` Marco Elver
2022-08-31 11:37 ` Vlastimil Babka
2022-08-31 14:04 ` Hyeonggon Yoo
2022-08-31 14:21 ` Marco Elver
2022-08-31 16:16 ` Vlastimil Babka
2022-09-01 1:26 ` Feng Tang
2022-09-01 8:47 ` Vlastimil Babka
2022-09-01 12:41 ` Feng Tang
2022-08-31 14:44 ` Feng Tang
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20220831073051.3032-1-feng.tang@intel.com \
--to=feng.tang@intel.com \
--cc=42.hyeyoo@gmail.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=dvyukov@google.com \
--cc=elver@google.com \
--cc=glider@google.com \
--cc=kasan-dev@googlegroups.com \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=vbabka@suse.cz \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox