From: "HORIGUCHI NAOYA(堀口 直也)" <naoya.horiguchi@nec.com>
To: Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@intel.com>
Cc: "akpm@linux-foundation.org" <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
"djwong@kernel.org" <djwong@kernel.org>,
Shiyang Ruan <ruansy.fnst@fujitsu.com>,
Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>, Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>,
Dave Chinner <david@fromorbit.com>,
Goldwyn Rodrigues <rgoldwyn@suse.de>,
Jane Chu <jane.chu@oracle.com>,
Matthew Wilcox <willy@infradead.org>,
Miaohe Lin <linmiaohe@huawei.com>,
Ritesh Harjani <riteshh@linux.ibm.com>,
"nvdimm@lists.linux.dev" <nvdimm@lists.linux.dev>,
"linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org" <linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org>,
"linux-mm@kvack.org" <linux-mm@kvack.org>,
"linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 4/4] mm/memory-failure: Fall back to vma_address() when ->notify_failure() fails
Date: Mon, 29 Aug 2022 05:42:39 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20220829054238.GB1029946@hori.linux.bs1.fc.nec.co.jp> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <166153429427.2758201.14605968329933175594.stgit@dwillia2-xfh.jf.intel.com>
On Fri, Aug 26, 2022 at 10:18:14AM -0700, Dan Williams wrote:
> In the case where a filesystem is polled to take over the memory failure
> and receives -EOPNOTSUPP it indicates that page->index and page->mapping
> are valid for reverse mapping the failure address. Introduce
> FSDAX_INVALID_PGOFF to distinguish when add_to_kill() is being called
> from mf_dax_kill_procs() by a filesytem vs the typical memory_failure()
> path.
>
> Otherwise, vma_pgoff_address() is called with an invalid fsdax_pgoff
> which then trips this failing signature:
>
> kernel BUG at mm/memory-failure.c:319!
> invalid opcode: 0000 [#1] PREEMPT SMP PTI
> CPU: 13 PID: 1262 Comm: dax-pmd Tainted: G OE N 6.0.0-rc2+ #62
> Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (Q35 + ICH9, 2009), BIOS 0.0.0 02/06/2015
> RIP: 0010:add_to_kill.cold+0x19d/0x209
> [..]
> Call Trace:
> <TASK>
> collect_procs.part.0+0x2c4/0x460
> memory_failure+0x71b/0xba0
> ? _printk+0x58/0x73
> do_madvise.part.0.cold+0xaf/0xc5
>
> Fixes: c36e20249571 ("mm: introduce mf_dax_kill_procs() for fsdax case")
> Cc: Shiyang Ruan <ruansy.fnst@fujitsu.com>
> Cc: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
> Cc: Darrick J. Wong <djwong@kernel.org>
> Cc: Naoya Horiguchi <naoya.horiguchi@nec.com>
> Cc: Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
> Cc: Dave Chinner <david@fromorbit.com>
> Cc: Goldwyn Rodrigues <rgoldwyn@suse.de>
> Cc: Jane Chu <jane.chu@oracle.com>
> Cc: Matthew Wilcox <willy@infradead.org>
> Cc: Miaohe Lin <linmiaohe@huawei.com>
> Cc: Ritesh Harjani <riteshh@linux.ibm.com>
> Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
> Signed-off-by: Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@intel.com>
Acked-by: Naoya Horiguchi <naoya.horiguchi@nec.com>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2022-08-29 5:42 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2022-08-26 17:17 [PATCH 0/4] mm, xfs, dax: Fixes for memory_failure() handling Dan Williams
2022-08-26 17:17 ` [PATCH 1/4] xfs: Quiet notify_failure EOPNOTSUPP cases Dan Williams
2022-09-05 14:42 ` Christoph Hellwig
2022-08-26 17:18 ` [PATCH 2/4] xfs: Fix SB_BORN check in xfs_dax_notify_failure() Dan Williams
2022-09-05 14:44 ` Christoph Hellwig
2022-08-26 17:18 ` [PATCH 3/4] mm/memory-failure: Fix detection of memory_failure() handlers Dan Williams
2022-08-29 5:39 ` HORIGUCHI NAOYA(堀口 直也)
2022-08-30 2:49 ` Miaohe Lin
2022-09-05 14:45 ` Christoph Hellwig
2022-08-26 17:18 ` [PATCH 4/4] mm/memory-failure: Fall back to vma_address() when ->notify_failure() fails Dan Williams
2022-08-29 5:42 ` HORIGUCHI NAOYA(堀口 直也) [this message]
2022-08-30 3:30 ` Miaohe Lin
2022-08-30 3:57 ` Dan Williams
2022-08-30 6:17 ` Miaohe Lin
2022-09-05 14:45 ` Christoph Hellwig
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20220829054238.GB1029946@hori.linux.bs1.fc.nec.co.jp \
--to=naoya.horiguchi@nec.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=dan.j.williams@intel.com \
--cc=david@fromorbit.com \
--cc=djwong@kernel.org \
--cc=hch@lst.de \
--cc=jane.chu@oracle.com \
--cc=linmiaohe@huawei.com \
--cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=nvdimm@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=rgoldwyn@suse.de \
--cc=riteshh@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=ruansy.fnst@fujitsu.com \
--cc=viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk \
--cc=willy@infradead.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox