From: Mel Gorman <mgorman@techsingularity.net>
To: Yu Zhao <yuzhao@google.com>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
Nicolas Saenz Julienne <nsaenzju@redhat.com>,
Marcelo Tosatti <mtosatti@redhat.com>,
Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@suse.cz>,
Michal Hocko <mhocko@kernel.org>, Hugh Dickins <hughd@google.com>,
Marek Szyprowski <m.szyprowski@samsung.com>,
LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Linux-MM <linux-mm@kvack.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/1] mm/page_alloc: Leave IRQs enabled for per-cpu page allocations
Date: Thu, 25 Aug 2022 10:11:19 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20220825091051.7awtjp25yh7bv3xf@techsingularity.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAOUHufbxqn5gjYxnZDLsRtaKgtauFXwL+qq_829Eg5PSJaSPgg@mail.gmail.com>
On Wed, Aug 24, 2022 at 10:58:26PM -0600, Yu Zhao wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 24, 2022 at 8:18 AM Mel Gorman <mgorman@techsingularity.net> wrote:
> >
> > The pcp_spin_lock_irqsave protecting the PCP lists is IRQ-safe as a task
> > allocating from the PCP must not re-enter the allocator from IRQ context.
> > In each instance where IRQ-reentrancy is possible, the lock is acquired using
> > pcp_spin_trylock_irqsave() even though IRQs are disabled and re-entrancy
> > is impossible.
> >
> > Demote the lock to pcp_spin_lock avoids an IRQ disable/enable in the common
> > case at the cost of some IRQ allocations taking a slower path. If the PCP
> > lists need to be refilled, the zone lock still needs to disable IRQs but
> > that will only happen on PCP refill and drain. If an IRQ is raised when
> > a PCP allocation is in progress, the trylock will fail and fallback to
> > using the buddy lists directly. Note that this may not be a universal win
> > if an interrupt-intensive workload also allocates heavily from interrupt
> > context and contends heavily on the zone->lock as a result.
>
> Hi,
>
> This patch caused the following warning. Please take a look.
>
Thanks. I see the patch is already taken out of mm-unstable so back to
the drawing board!
--
Mel Gorman
SUSE Labs
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2022-08-25 9:11 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2022-08-24 14:18 Mel Gorman
2022-08-25 4:58 ` Yu Zhao
2022-08-25 9:11 ` Mel Gorman [this message]
2022-10-10 14:22 ` Mel Gorman
2022-10-10 20:45 ` Vlastimil Babka
2022-10-10 22:09 ` Yu Zhao
2022-10-13 10:10 ` Mel Gorman
2022-10-11 8:25 ` Mel Gorman
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20220825091051.7awtjp25yh7bv3xf@techsingularity.net \
--to=mgorman@techsingularity.net \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=hughd@google.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=m.szyprowski@samsung.com \
--cc=mhocko@kernel.org \
--cc=mtosatti@redhat.com \
--cc=nsaenzju@redhat.com \
--cc=vbabka@suse.cz \
--cc=yuzhao@google.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox