From: Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@suse.cz>
To: Rongwei Wang <rongwei.wang@linux.alibaba.com>,
Christoph Lameter <cl@linux.com>,
Joonsoo Kim <iamjoonsoo.kim@lge.com>,
David Rientjes <rientjes@google.com>,
Pekka Enberg <penberg@kernel.org>
Cc: Hyeonggon Yoo <42.hyeyoo@gmail.com>,
Roman Gushchin <roman.gushchin@linux.dev>,
linux-mm@kvack.org,
Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@linutronix.de>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
Mike Galbraith <efault@gmx.de>, Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@suse.cz>
Subject: [PATCH v2 3/5] mm/slub: remove slab_lock() usage for debug operations
Date: Tue, 23 Aug 2022 19:03:58 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20220823170400.26546-4-vbabka@suse.cz> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20220823170400.26546-1-vbabka@suse.cz>
All alloc and free operations on debug caches are now serialized by
n->list_lock, so we can remove slab_lock() usage in validate_slab()
and list_slab_objects() as those also happen under n->list_lock.
Note the usage in list_slab_objects() could happen even on non-debug
caches, but only during cache shutdown time, so there should not be any
parallel freeing activity anymore. Except for buggy slab users, but in
that case the slab_lock() would not help against the common cmpxchg
based fast paths (in non-debug caches) anyway.
Also adjust documentation comments accordingly.
Suggested-by: Hyeonggon Yoo <42.hyeyoo@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@suse.cz>
Reviewed-by: Hyeonggon Yoo <42.hyeyoo@gmail.com>
Acked-by: David Rientjes <rientjes@google.com>
---
mm/slub.c | 19 ++++++++-----------
1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-)
diff --git a/mm/slub.c b/mm/slub.c
index a5a913879871..b4065e892f7c 100644
--- a/mm/slub.c
+++ b/mm/slub.c
@@ -50,7 +50,7 @@
* 1. slab_mutex (Global Mutex)
* 2. node->list_lock (Spinlock)
* 3. kmem_cache->cpu_slab->lock (Local lock)
- * 4. slab_lock(slab) (Only on some arches or for debugging)
+ * 4. slab_lock(slab) (Only on some arches)
* 5. object_map_lock (Only for debugging)
*
* slab_mutex
@@ -64,8 +64,9 @@
* The slab_lock is a wrapper around the page lock, thus it is a bit
* spinlock.
*
- * The slab_lock is only used for debugging and on arches that do not
- * have the ability to do a cmpxchg_double. It only protects:
+ * The slab_lock is only used on arches that do not have the ability
+ * to do a cmpxchg_double. It only protects:
+ *
* A. slab->freelist -> List of free objects in a slab
* B. slab->inuse -> Number of objects in use
* C. slab->objects -> Number of objects in slab
@@ -94,6 +95,9 @@
* allocating a long series of objects that fill up slabs does not require
* the list lock.
*
+ * For debug caches, all allocations are forced to go through a list_lock
+ * protected region to serialize against concurrent validation.
+ *
* cpu_slab->lock local lock
*
* This locks protect slowpath manipulation of all kmem_cache_cpu fields
@@ -4368,7 +4372,6 @@ static void list_slab_objects(struct kmem_cache *s, struct slab *slab,
void *p;
slab_err(s, slab, text, s->name);
- slab_lock(slab, &flags);
map = get_map(s, slab);
for_each_object(p, s, addr, slab->objects) {
@@ -4379,7 +4382,6 @@ static void list_slab_objects(struct kmem_cache *s, struct slab *slab,
}
}
put_map(map);
- slab_unlock(slab, &flags);
#endif
}
@@ -5107,12 +5109,9 @@ static void validate_slab(struct kmem_cache *s, struct slab *slab,
{
void *p;
void *addr = slab_address(slab);
- unsigned long flags;
-
- slab_lock(slab, &flags);
if (!check_slab(s, slab) || !on_freelist(s, slab, NULL))
- goto unlock;
+ return;
/* Now we know that a valid freelist exists */
__fill_map(obj_map, s, slab);
@@ -5123,8 +5122,6 @@ static void validate_slab(struct kmem_cache *s, struct slab *slab,
if (!check_object(s, slab, p, val))
break;
}
-unlock:
- slab_unlock(slab, &flags);
}
static int validate_slab_node(struct kmem_cache *s,
--
2.37.2
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2022-08-23 17:04 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 20+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2022-08-23 17:03 [PATCH v2 0/5] mm/slub: fix validation races and cleanup locking Vlastimil Babka
2022-08-23 17:03 ` [PATCH v2 1/5] mm/slub: move free_debug_processing() further Vlastimil Babka
2022-08-23 17:03 ` [PATCH v2 2/5] mm/slub: restrict sysfs validation to debug caches and make it safe Vlastimil Babka
2022-08-24 4:41 ` Hyeonggon Yoo
2022-08-23 17:03 ` Vlastimil Babka [this message]
2022-08-23 17:03 ` [PATCH v2 4/5] mm/slub: convert object_map_lock to non-raw spinlock Vlastimil Babka
2022-08-24 15:53 ` Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
2022-08-23 17:04 ` [PATCH v2 5/5] mm/slub: simplify __cmpxchg_double_slab() and slab_[un]lock() Vlastimil Babka
2022-08-24 10:24 ` Hyeonggon Yoo
2022-08-24 11:51 ` Vlastimil Babka
2022-08-24 12:45 ` Hyeonggon Yoo
2022-08-24 16:31 ` Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
2022-08-24 13:04 ` Hyeonggon Yoo
2022-08-25 12:41 ` Vlastimil Babka
2022-08-24 16:25 ` Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
2022-08-25 12:59 ` Vlastimil Babka
2022-08-25 7:51 ` [PATCH 6/5] slub: Make PREEMPT_RT support less convoluted Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
2022-08-25 8:41 ` Vlastimil Babka
2022-08-25 8:49 ` Hyeonggon Yoo
2022-08-25 13:16 ` [PATCH v2 0/5] mm/slub: fix validation races and cleanup locking Vlastimil Babka
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20220823170400.26546-4-vbabka@suse.cz \
--to=vbabka@suse.cz \
--cc=42.hyeyoo@gmail.com \
--cc=bigeasy@linutronix.de \
--cc=cl@linux.com \
--cc=efault@gmx.de \
--cc=iamjoonsoo.kim@lge.com \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=penberg@kernel.org \
--cc=rientjes@google.com \
--cc=roman.gushchin@linux.dev \
--cc=rongwei.wang@linux.alibaba.com \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox