From: "HORIGUCHI NAOYA(堀口 直也)" <naoya.horiguchi@nec.com>
To: Miaohe Lin <linmiaohe@huawei.com>
Cc: "akpm@linux-foundation.org" <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
"linux-mm@kvack.org" <linux-mm@kvack.org>,
"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 4/6] mm, hwpoison: fix possible use-after-free in mf_dax_kill_procs()
Date: Fri, 19 Aug 2022 05:23:25 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20220819052324.GD613144@hori.linux.bs1.fc.nec.co.jp> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20220818130016.45313-5-linmiaohe@huawei.com>
On Thu, Aug 18, 2022 at 09:00:14PM +0800, Miaohe Lin wrote:
> After kill_procs(), tk will be freed without being removed from the to_kill
> list. In the next iteration, the freed list entry in the to_kill list will
> be accessed, thus leading to use-after-free issue.
kill_procs() runs over the to_kill list and frees all listed items in each
iteration. So just after returning from unmap_and_kill(), to_kill->next and
to_kill->prev still point to the addresses of struct to_kill which was the
first or last item (already freed!). This is bad-manered, but
collect_procs_fsdax() in the next iteration calls list_add_tail() and
overwrites the dangling pointers with newly allocated item. So this problem
should not be so critical? Anyway, I agree with fixing this fragile code.
> Fix it by reinitializing
> the to_kill list after unmap_and_kill().
>
> Fixes: c36e20249571 ("mm: introduce mf_dax_kill_procs() for fsdax case")
> Signed-off-by: Miaohe Lin <linmiaohe@huawei.com>
> ---
> mm/memory-failure.c | 2 ++
> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/mm/memory-failure.c b/mm/memory-failure.c
> index 7023c3d81273..a2f4e8b00a26 100644
> --- a/mm/memory-failure.c
> +++ b/mm/memory-failure.c
> @@ -1658,6 +1658,8 @@ int mf_dax_kill_procs(struct address_space *mapping, pgoff_t index,
> collect_procs_fsdax(page, mapping, index, &to_kill);
> unmap_and_kill(&to_kill, page_to_pfn(page), mapping,
> index, mf_flags);
> + /* Reinitialize to_kill list for later resuing. */
s/resuing/reusing/ ?
> + INIT_LIST_HEAD(&to_kill);
How about adding list_del() in kill_procs()? Other callers now use
to_kill only once, but fixing generally looks tidier to me.
Thanks,
Naoya Horiguchi
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2022-08-19 5:23 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 17+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2022-08-18 13:00 [PATCH 0/6] A few fixup patches for hugetlb Miaohe Lin
2022-08-18 13:00 ` [PATCH 1/6] mm, hwpoison: fix page refcnt leaking in try_memory_failure_hugetlb() Miaohe Lin
2022-08-19 5:20 ` HORIGUCHI NAOYA(堀口 直也)
2022-08-18 13:00 ` [PATCH 2/6] mm, hwpoison: fix page refcnt leaking in unpoison_memory() Miaohe Lin
2022-08-19 5:21 ` HORIGUCHI NAOYA(堀口 直也)
2022-08-18 13:00 ` [PATCH 3/6] mm, hwpoison: fix extra put_page() in soft_offline_page() Miaohe Lin
2022-08-19 5:21 ` HORIGUCHI NAOYA(堀口 直也)
2022-08-18 13:00 ` [PATCH 4/6] mm, hwpoison: fix possible use-after-free in mf_dax_kill_procs() Miaohe Lin
2022-08-19 5:23 ` HORIGUCHI NAOYA(堀口 直也) [this message]
2022-08-19 7:32 ` Miaohe Lin
2022-08-18 13:00 ` [PATCH 5/6] mm, hwpoison: kill procs if unmap fails Miaohe Lin
2022-08-19 5:24 ` HORIGUCHI NAOYA(堀口 直也)
2022-08-19 7:37 ` Miaohe Lin
2022-08-19 8:18 ` HORIGUCHI NAOYA(堀口 直也)
2022-08-18 13:00 ` [PATCH 6/6] mm, hwpoison: avoid trying to unpoison reserved page Miaohe Lin
2022-08-19 5:24 ` HORIGUCHI NAOYA(堀口 直也)
2022-08-18 13:05 ` [PATCH 0/6] A few fixup patches for hugetlb Miaohe Lin
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20220819052324.GD613144@hori.linux.bs1.fc.nec.co.jp \
--to=naoya.horiguchi@nec.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=linmiaohe@huawei.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox