Re: [PATCH v2] writeback: avoid use-after-free after removing device

[Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>]

On Mon 01-08-22 08:50:34, Khazhismel Kumykov wrote:
> When a disk is removed, bdi_unregister gets called to stop further
> writeback and wait for associated delayed work to complete. However,
> wb_inode_writeback_end() may schedule bandwidth estimation dwork after
> this has completed, which can result in the timer attempting to access
> the just freed bdi_writeback.
> 
> Fix this by checking if the bdi_writeback is alive, similar to when
> scheduling writeback work.
> 
> Since this requires wb->work_lock, and wb_inode_writeback_end() may get
> called from interrupt, switch wb->work_lock to an irqsafe lock.
> 
> Fixes: 45a2966fd641 ("writeback: fix bandwidth estimate for spiky workload")
> Signed-off-by: Khazhismel Kumykov <khazhy@google.com>

Looks good to me. Feel free to add:

Reviewed-by: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>

								Honza


> ---
>  fs/fs-writeback.c   | 12 ++++++------
>  mm/backing-dev.c    | 10 +++++-----
>  mm/page-writeback.c |  6 +++++-
>  3 files changed, 16 insertions(+), 12 deletions(-)
> 
> v2: made changelog a bit more verbose
> 
> diff --git a/fs/fs-writeback.c b/fs/fs-writeback.c
> index 05221366a16d..08a1993ab7fd 100644
> --- a/fs/fs-writeback.c
> +++ b/fs/fs-writeback.c
> @@ -134,10 +134,10 @@ static bool inode_io_list_move_locked(struct inode *inode,
>  
>  static void wb_wakeup(struct bdi_writeback *wb)
>  {
> -	spin_lock_bh(&wb->work_lock);
> +	spin_lock_irq(&wb->work_lock);
>  	if (test_bit(WB_registered, &wb->state))
>  		mod_delayed_work(bdi_wq, &wb->dwork, 0);
> -	spin_unlock_bh(&wb->work_lock);
> +	spin_unlock_irq(&wb->work_lock);
>  }
>  
>  static void finish_writeback_work(struct bdi_writeback *wb,
> @@ -164,7 +164,7 @@ static void wb_queue_work(struct bdi_writeback *wb,
>  	if (work->done)
>  		atomic_inc(&work->done->cnt);
>  
> -	spin_lock_bh(&wb->work_lock);
> +	spin_lock_irq(&wb->work_lock);
>  
>  	if (test_bit(WB_registered, &wb->state)) {
>  		list_add_tail(&work->list, &wb->work_list);
> @@ -172,7 +172,7 @@ static void wb_queue_work(struct bdi_writeback *wb,
>  	} else
>  		finish_writeback_work(wb, work);
>  
> -	spin_unlock_bh(&wb->work_lock);
> +	spin_unlock_irq(&wb->work_lock);
>  }
>  
>  /**
> @@ -2082,13 +2082,13 @@ static struct wb_writeback_work *get_next_work_item(struct bdi_writeback *wb)
>  {
>  	struct wb_writeback_work *work = NULL;
>  
> -	spin_lock_bh(&wb->work_lock);
> +	spin_lock_irq(&wb->work_lock);
>  	if (!list_empty(&wb->work_list)) {
>  		work = list_entry(wb->work_list.next,
>  				  struct wb_writeback_work, list);
>  		list_del_init(&work->list);
>  	}
> -	spin_unlock_bh(&wb->work_lock);
> +	spin_unlock_irq(&wb->work_lock);
>  	return work;
>  }
>  
> diff --git a/mm/backing-dev.c b/mm/backing-dev.c
> index 95550b8fa7fe..de65cb1e5f76 100644
> --- a/mm/backing-dev.c
> +++ b/mm/backing-dev.c
> @@ -260,10 +260,10 @@ void wb_wakeup_delayed(struct bdi_writeback *wb)
>  	unsigned long timeout;
>  
>  	timeout = msecs_to_jiffies(dirty_writeback_interval * 10);
> -	spin_lock_bh(&wb->work_lock);
> +	spin_lock_irq(&wb->work_lock);
>  	if (test_bit(WB_registered, &wb->state))
>  		queue_delayed_work(bdi_wq, &wb->dwork, timeout);
> -	spin_unlock_bh(&wb->work_lock);
> +	spin_unlock_irq(&wb->work_lock);
>  }
>  
>  static void wb_update_bandwidth_workfn(struct work_struct *work)
> @@ -334,12 +334,12 @@ static void cgwb_remove_from_bdi_list(struct bdi_writeback *wb);
>  static void wb_shutdown(struct bdi_writeback *wb)
>  {
>  	/* Make sure nobody queues further work */
> -	spin_lock_bh(&wb->work_lock);
> +	spin_lock_irq(&wb->work_lock);
>  	if (!test_and_clear_bit(WB_registered, &wb->state)) {
> -		spin_unlock_bh(&wb->work_lock);
> +		spin_unlock_irq(&wb->work_lock);
>  		return;
>  	}
> -	spin_unlock_bh(&wb->work_lock);
> +	spin_unlock_irq(&wb->work_lock);
>  
>  	cgwb_remove_from_bdi_list(wb);
>  	/*
> diff --git a/mm/page-writeback.c b/mm/page-writeback.c
> index 55c2776ae699..3c34db15cf70 100644
> --- a/mm/page-writeback.c
> +++ b/mm/page-writeback.c
> @@ -2867,6 +2867,7 @@ static void wb_inode_writeback_start(struct bdi_writeback *wb)
>  
>  static void wb_inode_writeback_end(struct bdi_writeback *wb)
>  {
> +	unsigned long flags;
>  	atomic_dec(&wb->writeback_inodes);
>  	/*
>  	 * Make sure estimate of writeback throughput gets updated after
> @@ -2875,7 +2876,10 @@ static void wb_inode_writeback_end(struct bdi_writeback *wb)
>  	 * that if multiple inodes end writeback at a similar time, they get
>  	 * batched into one bandwidth update.
>  	 */
> -	queue_delayed_work(bdi_wq, &wb->bw_dwork, BANDWIDTH_INTERVAL);
> +	spin_lock_irqsave(&wb->work_lock, flags);
> +	if (test_bit(WB_registered, &wb->state))
> +		queue_delayed_work(bdi_wq, &wb->bw_dwork, BANDWIDTH_INTERVAL);
> +	spin_unlock_irqrestore(&wb->work_lock, flags);
>  }
>  
>  bool __folio_end_writeback(struct folio *folio)
> -- 
> 2.37.1.455.g008518b4e5-goog
> 
-- 
Jan Kara <jack@suse.com>
SUSE Labs, CR