From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from kanga.kvack.org (kanga.kvack.org [205.233.56.17]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5A939C43334 for ; Wed, 20 Jul 2022 01:37:32 +0000 (UTC) Received: by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix) id B37116B0072; Tue, 19 Jul 2022 21:37:31 -0400 (EDT) Received: by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix, from userid 40) id AC00C6B0073; Tue, 19 Jul 2022 21:37:31 -0400 (EDT) X-Delivered-To: int-list-linux-mm@kvack.org Received: by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix, from userid 63042) id 9607A6B0074; Tue, 19 Jul 2022 21:37:31 -0400 (EDT) X-Delivered-To: linux-mm@kvack.org Received: from relay.hostedemail.com (smtprelay0010.hostedemail.com [216.40.44.10]) by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 82F4F6B0072 for ; Tue, 19 Jul 2022 21:37:31 -0400 (EDT) Received: from smtpin11.hostedemail.com (a10.router.float.18 [10.200.18.1]) by unirelay04.hostedemail.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 576D11A045E for ; Wed, 20 Jul 2022 01:37:31 +0000 (UTC) X-FDA: 79705765902.11.238482A Received: from sin.source.kernel.org (sin.source.kernel.org [145.40.73.55]) by imf13.hostedemail.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8258820093 for ; Wed, 20 Jul 2022 01:37:30 +0000 (UTC) Received: from smtp.kernel.org (relay.kernel.org [52.25.139.140]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by sin.source.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 3CE5FCE1CAD; Wed, 20 Jul 2022 01:37:26 +0000 (UTC) Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id D4CA1C341C6; Wed, 20 Jul 2022 01:37:23 +0000 (UTC) Date: Tue, 19 Jul 2022 21:37:21 -0400 From: Steven Rostedt To: Kent Overstreet Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org, pmladek@suse.com, linux@rasmusvillemoes.dk, willy@infradead.org Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 00/34] Printbufs - new data structure for building strings Message-ID: <20220719213704.5f4a5d61@rorschach.local.home> In-Reply-To: <19c1a301-13ca-d7cf-c0f6-a63f75b7f8eb@gmail.com> References: <20220620004233.3805-1-kent.overstreet@gmail.com> <20220719191522.4002a5fb@gandalf.local.home> <7462e934-f746-eef7-ff92-0eeb8cc08b82@gmail.com> <20220719200507.361b06ee@rorschach.local.home> <20220719211156.75ea9255@rorschach.local.home> <19c1a301-13ca-d7cf-c0f6-a63f75b7f8eb@gmail.com> X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.17.8 (GTK+ 2.24.33; x86_64-pc-linux-gnu) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit ARC-Seal: i=1; s=arc-20220608; d=hostedemail.com; t=1658281050; a=rsa-sha256; cv=none; b=ooXTRgecnU1yP7BTh4vif5yrn7JLA5FCuVnaUgrlwaOpyytXMLmTcyKv5cyfgVu113Fp+q nVPvTorfYV4S5DZqR9Rg2d15PrRVsk0tJKLUTTRVtCDr64sN6uT+ky3y3sbaPR0zW5M/lD iQRq5bNd+fZgiG0YccENIUdOMaaGdoQ= ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; imf13.hostedemail.com; dkim=none; spf=pass (imf13.hostedemail.com: domain of "SRS0=7KbO=XZ=goodmis.org=rostedt@kernel.org" designates 145.40.73.55 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom="SRS0=7KbO=XZ=goodmis.org=rostedt@kernel.org"; dmarc=none ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=hostedemail.com; s=arc-20220608; t=1658281050; h=from:from:sender:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date: message-id:message-id:to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version: content-type:content-type: content-transfer-encoding:content-transfer-encoding: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=f7d2qhs3us0CAF6HoN/oUVsEgfrmI8gtUj5irL9GOVc=; b=PyMaGcbE3gDZvMtQ6kv81SSHa9a31aaUfjFCnEGajahjrrh+Hs35/6ZdNhUr4L6kl8aECm aVsv/NaHM5mnJcT20cqss2Jk5A32y0WaUL7c3pEZ8ymV6ZzhQJaVofz7d1Xw6B09+WMc+v iJ1AOW2QvtcHZ6xLG9U0E2NvJrxwR9I= X-Stat-Signature: 39kmuut745h615i57ockmcr7a1ep911f X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 8258820093 Authentication-Results: imf13.hostedemail.com; dkim=none; spf=pass (imf13.hostedemail.com: domain of "SRS0=7KbO=XZ=goodmis.org=rostedt@kernel.org" designates 145.40.73.55 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom="SRS0=7KbO=XZ=goodmis.org=rostedt@kernel.org"; dmarc=none X-Rspam-User: X-Rspamd-Server: rspam10 X-HE-Tag: 1658281050-278865 X-Bogosity: Ham, tests=bogofilter, spamicity=0.000000, version=1.2.4 Sender: owner-linux-mm@kvack.org Precedence: bulk X-Loop: owner-majordomo@kvack.org List-ID: On Tue, 19 Jul 2022 21:31:49 -0400 Kent Overstreet wrote: > > No, my response is, why should we replace something that is working > > just fine? > For you. For your code. For the current working kernel. > > Look, Steve, I've tried to work with you. And I've given you reasons why > seq_buf doesn't work for vsprintf.c, and more general cases. You have Please post the lore links, I'll go back and read them. > not responded _at all_ with technical reasons or discussion, all you've > done from the very start is lecture me on process. That's because process *is* the way things get into upstream. I guess you fail to understand that. > > And, to be blunt, the time to have the printbuf vs. seq_buf discussion > was months ago. I tried to start that discussion with you, and you > ghosted on IRC when I started talking about the things in seq_buf that > would have to change. Look, that was when I was traveling. And when I'm traveling I pretty much do not respond to IRC. > > Like I said, I'll CC you when v5 is posted. OK. -- Steve