From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from kanga.kvack.org (kanga.kvack.org [205.233.56.17]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A90B4C433EF for ; Tue, 19 Jul 2022 01:29:07 +0000 (UTC) Received: by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix) id 03FA78E0001; Mon, 18 Jul 2022 21:29:07 -0400 (EDT) Received: by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix, from userid 40) id F31CC6B007B; Mon, 18 Jul 2022 21:29:06 -0400 (EDT) X-Delivered-To: int-list-linux-mm@kvack.org Received: by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix, from userid 63042) id E20AD8E0001; Mon, 18 Jul 2022 21:29:06 -0400 (EDT) X-Delivered-To: linux-mm@kvack.org Received: from relay.hostedemail.com (smtprelay0015.hostedemail.com [216.40.44.15]) by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D5CBD6B0078 for ; Mon, 18 Jul 2022 21:29:06 -0400 (EDT) Received: from smtpin12.hostedemail.com (a10.router.float.18 [10.200.18.1]) by unirelay02.hostedemail.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9FE6834E03 for ; Tue, 19 Jul 2022 01:29:06 +0000 (UTC) X-FDA: 79702115892.12.79D5AD8 Received: from mga14.intel.com (mga14.intel.com [192.55.52.115]) by imf22.hostedemail.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C4FBEC0079 for ; Tue, 19 Jul 2022 01:29:05 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=intel.com; i=@intel.com; q=dns/txt; s=Intel; t=1658194145; x=1689730145; h=date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:mime-version; bh=iyoyXc9+RdVnhjH1ZDFNgUWfzqQHh3b5TWoUR0Od0Lo=; b=LwK6H3Zwzt5/iuXb+J26Sp8rox4N8WmTFvla/HxcvodBX8rhnoJ769xZ 72iUkGZbgn4gfnAXKgWCwntlMzym5hOop0Yp8xBLJBDZ9Lnr/iESoxRIR xi5O7AjxULfJhSiH38swPiOrvSHCWtISmoDZwJP5/Xkmjj2kAk+jleFN0 YBWBYBm8kFPQamuhf/YK1QLSt+bcm9El5hez+6vJu0woW4+xv6U97b0iF tRnFT/J+Ax4nin2Y77/03c38v+PcA7MKjO6zGcK+eSdbwuXdBfTkzC3G7 l9N4u+Oby6EmC1d4WcQ/9nmVbT4EakriI9bzP5gMCmOx3r9601+iYE1oW Q==; X-IronPort-AV: E=McAfee;i="6400,9594,10412"; a="286375281" X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.92,282,1650956400"; d="scan'208";a="286375281" Received: from orsmga006.jf.intel.com ([10.7.209.51]) by fmsmga103.fm.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 18 Jul 2022 18:29:04 -0700 X-ExtLoop1: 1 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.92,282,1650956400"; d="scan'208";a="572638029" Received: from lkp-server02.sh.intel.com (HELO ff137eb26ff1) ([10.239.97.151]) by orsmga006.jf.intel.com with ESMTP; 18 Jul 2022 18:29:02 -0700 Received: from kbuild by ff137eb26ff1 with local (Exim 4.95) (envelope-from ) id 1oDc2n-00057C-P6; Tue, 19 Jul 2022 01:29:01 +0000 Date: Tue, 19 Jul 2022 09:28:51 +0800 From: kernel test robot To: Guillaume Tucker Cc: kbuild-all@lists.01.org, Linux Memory Management List , Shuah Khan Subject: [linux-next:master 8922/11208] lib/x86_64/processor.c:636:25: error: 'KVM_X86_XCOMP_GUEST_SUPP' undeclared Message-ID: <202207190951.yMvCFx3C-lkp@intel.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline ARC-Seal: i=1; s=arc-20220608; d=hostedemail.com; t=1658194146; a=rsa-sha256; cv=none; b=03IrOXYGZ4RJWggnT1cxd+8R2bl+2U5dZso4m95jSCojqzmM5uDT2g+ScD8AoaRc9EM3X9 SkTAraiydMOBDpczQlis3IsXwl/FIECHVc14XPTTvMFjAxvurvaaL1gi1cSsOCc9Y6zHpY FB2rTSNWD5WyTSXjcV7O8wQ9Wm35Lr4= ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; imf22.hostedemail.com; dkim=pass header.d=intel.com header.s=Intel header.b=LwK6H3Zw; spf=none (imf22.hostedemail.com: domain of lkp@intel.com has no SPF policy when checking 192.55.52.115) smtp.mailfrom=lkp@intel.com; dmarc=pass (policy=none) header.from=intel.com ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=hostedemail.com; s=arc-20220608; t=1658194146; h=from:from:sender:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date: message-id:message-id:to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version: content-type:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:in-reply-to: references:dkim-signature; bh=JVMdw3FaG+4iLY9xY8kbrCHDnnMACt3lSnJYvJVY7Tw=; b=bixhYkEdRhTVDT4IMvdjLrPL67XIV9VMQvxk61bgF5io44yhSRb8zu6IPnZVZlL5FKeWWS +T/xqog2Sj96rofUTVdg2S1ZWu1K9xXH8Bhh/6TOYZn20r3cTDMAcUD68U9XNMc/WfT6K/ Jq6+zSCcGColh3gV/N5OseQ853QYANk= X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: C4FBEC0079 Authentication-Results: imf22.hostedemail.com; dkim=pass header.d=intel.com header.s=Intel header.b=LwK6H3Zw; spf=none (imf22.hostedemail.com: domain of lkp@intel.com has no SPF policy when checking 192.55.52.115) smtp.mailfrom=lkp@intel.com; dmarc=pass (policy=none) header.from=intel.com X-Rspam-User: X-Rspamd-Server: rspam06 X-Stat-Signature: hror1t78rbh5gtqr46f6huqnnckt4k4t X-HE-Tag: 1658194145-787586 X-Bogosity: Ham, tests=bogofilter, spamicity=0.000000, version=1.2.4 Sender: owner-linux-mm@kvack.org Precedence: bulk X-Loop: owner-majordomo@kvack.org List-ID: tree: https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/next/linux-next.git master head: 036ad6daa8f0fd357af7f50f9da58539eaa6f68c commit: 3bb267a36185b64949ea9c8bbfe93eb01986f6cb [8922/11208] selftests: drop khdr make target reproduce: make O=/tmp/kselftest -C tools/testing/selftests If you fix the issue, kindly add following tag where applicable Reported-by: kernel test robot Note: the linux-next/master HEAD 036ad6daa8f0fd357af7f50f9da58539eaa6f68c builds fine. It may have been fixed somewhere. All errors (new ones prefixed by >>): lib/x86_64/processor.c: In function 'vm_xsave_req_perm': >> lib/x86_64/processor.c:636:25: error: 'KVM_X86_XCOMP_GUEST_SUPP' undeclared (first use in this function) 636 | .attr = KVM_X86_XCOMP_GUEST_SUPP, | ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ lib/x86_64/processor.c:636:25: note: each undeclared identifier is reported only once for each function it appears in >> lib/x86_64/processor.c:652:38: error: 'ARCH_REQ_XCOMP_GUEST_PERM' undeclared (first use in this function); did you mean 'ARCH_REQ_XCOMP_PERM'? 652 | rc = syscall(SYS_arch_prctl, ARCH_REQ_XCOMP_GUEST_PERM, bit); | ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ | ARCH_REQ_XCOMP_PERM >> lib/x86_64/processor.c:661:38: error: 'ARCH_GET_XCOMP_GUEST_PERM' undeclared (first use in this function); did you mean 'ARCH_GET_XCOMP_PERM'? 661 | rc = syscall(SYS_arch_prctl, ARCH_GET_XCOMP_GUEST_PERM, &bitmask); | ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ | ARCH_GET_XCOMP_PERM lib/x86_64/processor.c: In function 'vcpu_save_xsave_state': >> lib/x86_64/processor.c:1085:33: error: 'KVM_CAP_XSAVE2' undeclared (first use in this function); did you mean 'KVM_CAP_XSAVE'? 1085 | size = vm_check_cap(vm, KVM_CAP_XSAVE2); | ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~ | KVM_CAP_XSAVE lib/x86_64/processor.c:1093:40: error: 'KVM_GET_XSAVE2' undeclared (first use in this function); did you mean 'KVM_GET_XSAVE'? 1093 | return ioctl(vcpu->fd, KVM_GET_XSAVE2, state->xsave); | ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~ | KVM_GET_XSAVE lib/x86_64/processor.c:1094:1: warning: control reaches end of non-void function [-Wreturn-type] 1094 | } | ^ -- fs_test.c: In function 'layout1_file_and_dir_access_rights_child': >> fs_test.c:404:21: error: 'LANDLOCK_ACCESS_FS_REFER' undeclared (first use in this function); did you mean 'LANDLOCK_ACCESS_FS_READ_DIR'? 404 | #define ACCESS_LAST LANDLOCK_ACCESS_FS_REFER | ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ fs_test.c:418:9: note: in expansion of macro 'ACCESS_LAST' 418 | ACCESS_LAST) | ^~~~~~~~~~~ fs_test.c:429:38: note: in expansion of macro 'ACCESS_ALL' 429 | .handled_access_fs = ACCESS_ALL, | ^~~~~~~~~~ fs_test.c:404:21: note: each undeclared identifier is reported only once for each function it appears in 404 | #define ACCESS_LAST LANDLOCK_ACCESS_FS_REFER | ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ fs_test.c:418:9: note: in expansion of macro 'ACCESS_LAST' 418 | ACCESS_LAST) | ^~~~~~~~~~~ fs_test.c:429:38: note: in expansion of macro 'ACCESS_ALL' 429 | .handled_access_fs = ACCESS_ALL, | ^~~~~~~~~~ fs_test.c: In function 'layout1_unknown_access_rights_child': >> fs_test.c:404:21: error: 'LANDLOCK_ACCESS_FS_REFER' undeclared (first use in this function); did you mean 'LANDLOCK_ACCESS_FS_READ_DIR'? 404 | #define ACCESS_LAST LANDLOCK_ACCESS_FS_REFER | ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ fs_test.c:470:55: note: in expansion of macro 'ACCESS_LAST' 470 | for (access_mask = 1ULL << 63; access_mask != ACCESS_LAST; | ^~~~~~~~~~~ fs_test.c: In function 'layout1_reparent_refer_child': fs_test.c:1980:35: error: 'LANDLOCK_ACCESS_FS_REFER' undeclared (first use in this function); did you mean 'LANDLOCK_ACCESS_FS_READ_DIR'? 1980 | .access = LANDLOCK_ACCESS_FS_REFER, | ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ | LANDLOCK_ACCESS_FS_READ_DIR fs_test.c: In function 'layout1_reparent_link_child': fs_test.c:2026:35: error: 'LANDLOCK_ACCESS_FS_REFER' undeclared (first use in this function); did you mean 'LANDLOCK_ACCESS_FS_READ_DIR'? 2026 | .access = LANDLOCK_ACCESS_FS_REFER, | ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ | LANDLOCK_ACCESS_FS_READ_DIR fs_test.c: In function 'layout1_reparent_rename_child': fs_test.c:2104:35: error: 'LANDLOCK_ACCESS_FS_REFER' undeclared (first use in this function); did you mean 'LANDLOCK_ACCESS_FS_READ_DIR'? 2104 | .access = LANDLOCK_ACCESS_FS_REFER, | ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ | LANDLOCK_ACCESS_FS_READ_DIR fs_test.c: In function 'reparent_exdev_layers_enforce1': fs_test.c:2245:35: error: 'LANDLOCK_ACCESS_FS_REFER' undeclared (first use in this function); did you mean 'LANDLOCK_ACCESS_FS_READ_DIR'? 2245 | .access = LANDLOCK_ACCESS_FS_REFER, | ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ | LANDLOCK_ACCESS_FS_READ_DIR fs_test.c: In function 'layout1_reparent_remove_child': fs_test.c:2540:35: error: 'LANDLOCK_ACCESS_FS_REFER' undeclared (first use in this function); did you mean 'LANDLOCK_ACCESS_FS_READ_DIR'? 2540 | .access = LANDLOCK_ACCESS_FS_REFER | | ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ | LANDLOCK_ACCESS_FS_READ_DIR fs_test.c: In function 'layout1_reparent_dom_superset_child': fs_test.c:2602:35: error: 'LANDLOCK_ACCESS_FS_REFER' undeclared (first use in this function); did you mean 'LANDLOCK_ACCESS_FS_READ_DIR'? 2602 | .access = LANDLOCK_ACCESS_FS_REFER, | ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ | LANDLOCK_ACCESS_FS_READ_DIR fs_test.c: In function 'layout1_bind_reparent_cross_mount_child': fs_test.c:3244:35: error: 'LANDLOCK_ACCESS_FS_REFER' undeclared (first use in this function); did you mean 'LANDLOCK_ACCESS_FS_READ_DIR'? 3244 | .access = LANDLOCK_ACCESS_FS_REFER, | ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ | LANDLOCK_ACCESS_FS_READ_DIR -- pm_nl_ctl.c: In function 'capture_events': >> pm_nl_ctl.c:189:61: error: 'MPTCP_ATTR_SERVER_SIDE' undeclared (first use in this function); did you mean 'MPTCP_ATTR_REM_ID'? 189 | else if (attrs->rta_type == MPTCP_ATTR_SERVER_SIDE) | ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ | MPTCP_ATTR_REM_ID pm_nl_ctl.c:189:61: note: each undeclared identifier is reported only once for each function it appears in pm_nl_ctl.c: In function 'dsf': >> pm_nl_ctl.c:347:46: error: 'MPTCP_PM_CMD_SUBFLOW_DESTROY' undeclared (first use in this function) 347 | off = init_genl_req(data, pm_family, MPTCP_PM_CMD_SUBFLOW_DESTROY, | ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ >> pm_nl_ctl.c:391:60: error: 'MPTCP_PM_ATTR_ADDR_REMOTE' undeclared (first use in this function); did you mean 'MPTCP_PM_ATTR_ADDR'? 391 | ((arg == 0) ? MPTCP_PM_ATTR_ADDR : MPTCP_PM_ATTR_ADDR_REMOTE); | ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ | MPTCP_PM_ATTR_ADDR >> pm_nl_ctl.c:430:25: error: 'MPTCP_PM_ATTR_TOKEN' undeclared (first use in this function); did you mean 'MPTCP_ATTR_TOKEN'? 430 | rta->rta_type = MPTCP_PM_ATTR_TOKEN; | ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ | MPTCP_ATTR_TOKEN pm_nl_ctl.c: In function 'csf': >> pm_nl_ctl.c:461:46: error: 'MPTCP_PM_CMD_SUBFLOW_CREATE' undeclared (first use in this function) 461 | off = init_genl_req(data, pm_family, MPTCP_PM_CMD_SUBFLOW_CREATE, | ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ pm_nl_ctl.c:505:60: error: 'MPTCP_PM_ATTR_ADDR_REMOTE' undeclared (first use in this function); did you mean 'MPTCP_PM_ATTR_ADDR'? 505 | ((arg == 0) ? MPTCP_PM_ATTR_ADDR : MPTCP_PM_ATTR_ADDR_REMOTE); | ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ | MPTCP_PM_ATTR_ADDR pm_nl_ctl.c:556:25: error: 'MPTCP_PM_ATTR_TOKEN' undeclared (first use in this function); did you mean 'MPTCP_ATTR_TOKEN'? 556 | rta->rta_type = MPTCP_PM_ATTR_TOKEN; | ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ | MPTCP_ATTR_TOKEN pm_nl_ctl.c: In function 'remove_addr': >> pm_nl_ctl.c:580:46: error: 'MPTCP_PM_CMD_REMOVE' undeclared (first use in this function); did you mean 'MPTCP_PM_CMD_UNSPEC'? 580 | off = init_genl_req(data, pm_family, MPTCP_PM_CMD_REMOVE, | ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ | MPTCP_PM_CMD_UNSPEC >> pm_nl_ctl.c:593:41: error: 'MPTCP_PM_ATTR_LOC_ID' undeclared (first use in this function); did you mean 'MPTCP_ATTR_LOC_ID'? 593 | rta->rta_type = MPTCP_PM_ATTR_LOC_ID; | ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ | MPTCP_ATTR_LOC_ID pm_nl_ctl.c:603:41: error: 'MPTCP_PM_ATTR_TOKEN' undeclared (first use in this function); did you mean 'MPTCP_ATTR_TOKEN'? 603 | rta->rta_type = MPTCP_PM_ATTR_TOKEN; | ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ | MPTCP_ATTR_TOKEN pm_nl_ctl.c: In function 'announce_addr': >> pm_nl_ctl.c:632:46: error: 'MPTCP_PM_CMD_ANNOUNCE' undeclared (first use in this function); did you mean 'MPTCP_PM_CMD_UNSPEC'? 632 | off = init_genl_req(data, pm_family, MPTCP_PM_CMD_ANNOUNCE, | ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ | MPTCP_PM_CMD_UNSPEC pm_nl_ctl.c:732:25: error: 'MPTCP_PM_ATTR_TOKEN' undeclared (first use in this function); did you mean 'MPTCP_ATTR_TOKEN'? 732 | rta->rta_type = MPTCP_PM_ATTR_TOKEN; | ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ | MPTCP_ATTR_TOKEN pm_nl_ctl.c: In function 'print_addr': >> pm_nl_ctl.c:1008:37: error: 'MPTCP_PM_ADDR_FLAG_IMPLICIT' undeclared (first use in this function); did you mean 'MPTCP_PM_ADDR_FLAG_FULLMESH'? 1008 | if (flags & MPTCP_PM_ADDR_FLAG_IMPLICIT) { | ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ | MPTCP_PM_ADDR_FLAG_FULLMESH -- 0-DAY CI Kernel Test Service https://01.org/lkp