Re: [PATCHv4 3/8] mm: Pass down mm_struct to untagged_addr()

["Kirill A. Shutemov" <kirill.shutemov@linux.intel.com>]

On Tue, Jul 05, 2022 at 05:42:21PM +0200, Alexander Potapenko wrote:
> Kirill,
> 
> 
> > diff --git a/lib/strnlen_user.c b/lib/strnlen_user.c
> > index feeb935a2299..abc096a68f05 100644
> > --- a/lib/strnlen_user.c
> > +++ b/lib/strnlen_user.c
> > @@ -97,7 +97,7 @@ long strnlen_user(const char __user *str, long count)
> >                 return 0;
> >
> >         max_addr = TASK_SIZE_MAX;
> > -       src_addr = (unsigned long)untagged_addr(str);
> > +       src_addr = (unsigned long)untagged_addr(current->mm, str);
> 
> In a downstream kernel with LAM disabled I'm seeing current->mm being
> NULL at this point, because strnlen_user() is being called by
> kdevtmpfs.
> IIUC current->mm is only guaranteed to be non-NULL in the userspace
> process context, whereas untagged_addr() may get called in random
> places.
> 
> Am I missing something?

Hm. Could you show a traceback?

As strnlen_user() intended to be used on an user string I expected it to
be called from a process context. I guess I'm wrong, but I don't yet
understand why.

-- 
 Kirill A. Shutemov