linux-mm.kvack.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>
To: "guanghui.fgh" <guanghuifeng@linux.alibaba.com>
Cc: baolin.wang@linux.alibaba.com, catalin.marinas@arm.com,
	akpm@linux-foundation.org, david@redhat.com, jianyong.wu@arm.com,
	james.morse@arm.com, quic_qiancai@quicinc.com,
	christophe.leroy@csgroup.eu, jonathan@marek.ca,
	mark.rutland@arm.com, thunder.leizhen@huawei.com,
	anshuman.khandual@arm.com, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, rppt@kernel.org,
	geert+renesas@glider.be, ardb@kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org,
	yaohongbo@linux.alibaba.com,
	alikernel-developer@linux.alibaba.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4] arm64: mm: fix linear mem mapping access performance degradation
Date: Mon, 4 Jul 2022 12:14:02 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20220704111402.GA31553@willie-the-truck> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <73f0c53b-fd17-c5e9-3773-1d71e564eb50@linux.alibaba.com>

On Mon, Jul 04, 2022 at 06:58:20PM +0800, guanghui.fgh wrote:
> 
> 
> 在 2022/7/4 18:35, Will Deacon 写道:
> > On Sat, Jul 02, 2022 at 11:57:53PM +0800, Guanghui Feng wrote:
> > > The arm64 can build 2M/1G block/sectiion mapping. When using DMA/DMA32 zone
> > > (enable crashkernel, disable rodata full, disable kfence), the mem_map will
> > > use non block/section mapping(for crashkernel requires to shrink the region
> > > in page granularity). But it will degrade performance when doing larging
> > > continuous mem access in kernel(memcpy/memmove, etc).
> > 
> > Hmm. It seems a bit silly to me that we take special care to unmap the
> > crashkernel from the linear map even when can_set_direct_map() is false, as
> > we won't be protecting the main kernel at all!
> > 
> > Why don't we just leave the crashkernel mapped if !can_set_direct_map()
> > and then this problem just goes away?
> > 
> > Will
> 
> This question had been asked lask week.

Sorry, I didn't spot that. Please could you link me to the conversation, as
I'm still unable to find it in my inbox?

> 1.Quoted messages from arch/arm64/mm/init.c
> 
> "Memory reservation for crash kernel either done early or deferred
> depending on DMA memory zones configs (ZONE_DMA) --
> 
> In absence of ZONE_DMA configs arm64_dma_phys_limit initialized
> here instead of max_zone_phys().  This lets early reservation of
> crash kernel memory which has a dependency on arm64_dma_phys_limit.
> Reserving memory early for crash kernel allows linear creation of block
> mappings (greater than page-granularity) for all the memory bank rangs.
> In this scheme a comparatively quicker boot is observed.
> 
> If ZONE_DMA configs are defined, crash kernel memory reservation
> is delayed until DMA zone memory range size initialization performed in
> zone_sizes_init().  The defer is necessary to steer clear of DMA zone
> memory range to avoid overlap allocation.
> 
> [[[
> So crash kernel memory boundaries are not known when mapping all bank memory
> ranges, which otherwise means not possible to exclude crash kernel range
> from creating block mappings so page-granularity mappings are created for
> the entire memory range.
> ]]]"
> 
> Namely, the init order: memblock init--->linear mem mapping(4k mapping for
> crashkernel, requirinig page-granularity changing))--->zone dma
> limit--->reserve crashkernel.
> So when enable ZONE DMA and using crashkernel, the mem mapping using 4k
> mapping.

Yes, I understand that is how things work today but I'm saying that we may
as well leave the crashkernel mapped (at block granularity) if
!can_set_direct_map() and then I think your patch becomes a lot simpler.

Will


  reply	other threads:[~2022-07-04 11:14 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 39+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2022-07-02 15:57 Guanghui Feng
2022-07-04 10:35 ` Will Deacon
2022-07-04 10:58   ` guanghui.fgh
2022-07-04 11:14     ` Will Deacon [this message]
2022-07-04 12:05       ` guanghui.fgh
2022-07-04 13:15         ` Will Deacon
2022-07-04 13:41           ` guanghui.fgh
2022-07-04 14:11           ` guanghui.fgh
2022-07-04 14:23             ` Will Deacon
2022-07-04 14:34               ` guanghui.fgh
2022-07-04 16:38                 ` Will Deacon
2022-07-04 17:09                   ` Ard Biesheuvel
2022-07-05  8:35                     ` Baoquan He
2022-07-05  9:52                     ` Will Deacon
2022-07-05 12:07                       ` guanghui.fgh
2022-07-05 12:11                         ` Will Deacon
2022-07-05 12:27                           ` guanghui.fgh
2022-07-05 12:56                           ` Mike Rapoport
2022-07-05 13:17                             ` guanghui.fgh
2022-07-05 15:02                           ` Mike Rapoport
2022-07-05 15:34                             ` Catalin Marinas
2022-07-05 15:57                               ` Mike Rapoport
2022-07-05 17:05                                 ` Catalin Marinas
2022-07-05 20:45                                   ` Mike Rapoport
2022-07-06  2:49                                     ` guanghui.fgh
2022-07-06  7:43                                       ` Catalin Marinas
2022-07-06 10:04                                     ` Catalin Marinas
2022-07-06 13:54                                       ` Mike Rapoport
2022-07-06 15:18                                         ` guanghui.fgh
2022-07-06 15:30                                           ` guanghui.fgh
2022-07-06 15:40                                           ` Catalin Marinas
2022-07-07 17:02                                             ` guanghui.fgh
2022-07-08 12:28                                             ` [PATCH RESEND " guanghui.fgh
2022-07-10 13:44                                               ` [PATCH v5] " Guanghui Feng
2022-07-10 14:32                                                 ` guanghui.fgh
2022-07-10 15:33                                                 ` guanghui.fgh
2022-07-18 13:10                                                   ` Will Deacon
2022-07-25  6:46                                                     ` Mike Rapoport
2022-07-05  2:44                   ` [PATCH v4] " guanghui.fgh

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20220704111402.GA31553@willie-the-truck \
    --to=will@kernel.org \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=alikernel-developer@linux.alibaba.com \
    --cc=anshuman.khandual@arm.com \
    --cc=ardb@kernel.org \
    --cc=baolin.wang@linux.alibaba.com \
    --cc=catalin.marinas@arm.com \
    --cc=christophe.leroy@csgroup.eu \
    --cc=david@redhat.com \
    --cc=geert+renesas@glider.be \
    --cc=guanghuifeng@linux.alibaba.com \
    --cc=james.morse@arm.com \
    --cc=jianyong.wu@arm.com \
    --cc=jonathan@marek.ca \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
    --cc=mark.rutland@arm.com \
    --cc=quic_qiancai@quicinc.com \
    --cc=rppt@kernel.org \
    --cc=thunder.leizhen@huawei.com \
    --cc=yaohongbo@linux.alibaba.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox