Re: [PATCH v4 2/2] UML: add support for KASAN under x86_64

[Vincent Whitchurch <vincent.whitchurch@axis.com>]

On Thu, Jun 30, 2022 at 11:41:04AM +0200, Dmitry Vyukov wrote:
> On Thu, 30 Jun 2022 at 10:08, David Gow <davidgow@google.com> wrote:
> > diff --git a/arch/um/kernel/Makefile b/arch/um/kernel/Makefile
> > index 1c2d4b29a3d4..a089217e2f0e 100644
> > --- a/arch/um/kernel/Makefile
> > +++ b/arch/um/kernel/Makefile
> > @@ -27,6 +27,9 @@ obj-$(CONFIG_EARLY_PRINTK) += early_printk.o
> >  obj-$(CONFIG_STACKTRACE) += stacktrace.o
> >  obj-$(CONFIG_GENERIC_PCI_IOMAP) += ioport.o
> >
> > +KASAN_SANITIZE_stacktrace.o := n
> > +KASAN_SANITIZE_sysrq.o := n
> 
> Why are these needed?
> It's helpful to leave some comments for any of *_SANITIZE:=n.
> Otherwise later it's unclear if it's due to some latent bugs, some
> inherent incompatibility, something that can be fixed, etc.

I believe I saw the stacktrace code itself triggering KASAN splats and
causing recursion when sanitization was not disabled on it.  I noticed
that other architectures disabled sanitization of their stacktrace code,
eg. ARM in commit 4d576cab16f57e1f87978f ("ARM: 9028/1: disable KASAN in
call stack capturing routines"), so I did not investigate it further.

(Note that despite the name, sysrq.c is also just stacktrace code.)