From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from kanga.kvack.org (kanga.kvack.org [205.233.56.17]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 121ADC433EF for ; Tue, 21 Jun 2022 02:39:41 +0000 (UTC) Received: by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix) id 9CB8C6B0072; Mon, 20 Jun 2022 22:39:40 -0400 (EDT) Received: by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix, from userid 40) id 97AE36B0073; Mon, 20 Jun 2022 22:39:40 -0400 (EDT) X-Delivered-To: int-list-linux-mm@kvack.org Received: by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix, from userid 63042) id 843BB8E0001; Mon, 20 Jun 2022 22:39:40 -0400 (EDT) X-Delivered-To: linux-mm@kvack.org Received: from relay.hostedemail.com (smtprelay0010.hostedemail.com [216.40.44.10]) by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 746DB6B0072 for ; Mon, 20 Jun 2022 22:39:40 -0400 (EDT) Received: from smtpin14.hostedemail.com (a10.router.float.18 [10.200.18.1]) by unirelay11.hostedemail.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4ADCE80E7D for ; Tue, 21 Jun 2022 02:39:40 +0000 (UTC) X-FDA: 79600687320.14.7074C7D Received: from mga17.intel.com (mga17.intel.com [192.55.52.151]) by imf17.hostedemail.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2321B40084 for ; Tue, 21 Jun 2022 02:39:36 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=intel.com; i=@intel.com; q=dns/txt; s=Intel; t=1655779177; x=1687315177; h=date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references: mime-version:in-reply-to; bh=xCEmjp76i6Brb9eB2mFQBJ51i6/s+EEMAFzhf6ZmxSo=; b=mvPK3n50chpgPe6thtSsmr2896UR0G6AVsjb/56t4aFaT7YYjLA4vSsM ItbYeQw1ZKJQg6QDKTEfMYT6yXhPn3QcYubFd7B5pwbjxXj7A2tLcJD6o qYqtblLpIFKXldzILhtqqG64Im9PXtxdrc+o7xkrOWcwFknTfScG6bDul vdfQvXgEtmGk6K0CXgoeoCwYv/yQ6o7l2bALAi279k1NQK4l3paLJtHcR efilF6eJvNwiFjGnQEbp12Ujp9ybKa1xWKm/j7jDl9uWb7IWa4xiYHwgH wqSsvtvYX9bRpXae4jiJuiNO+qdij/QbpQO0vIkT75HwiZZ2j9qE4Tt7A Q==; X-IronPort-AV: E=McAfee;i="6400,9594,10384"; a="260442854" X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.92,207,1650956400"; d="scan'208";a="260442854" Received: from orsmga005.jf.intel.com ([10.7.209.41]) by fmsmga107.fm.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 20 Jun 2022 19:39:33 -0700 X-ExtLoop1: 1 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.92,207,1650956400"; d="scan'208";a="764296831" Received: from lkp-server01.sh.intel.com (HELO 60dabacc1df6) ([10.239.97.150]) by orsmga005.jf.intel.com with ESMTP; 20 Jun 2022 19:39:32 -0700 Received: from kbuild by 60dabacc1df6 with local (Exim 4.95) (envelope-from ) id 1o3Tna-000Xuv-CG; Tue, 21 Jun 2022 02:39:26 +0000 Date: Tue, 21 Jun 2022 10:38:48 +0800 From: kernel test robot To: Edward Wu , Andrew Morton , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Cc: kbuild-all@lists.01.org, Linux Memory Management List , surenb@google.com, minchan@google.com, edwardwu@realtek.com Subject: Re: [PATCH] mm: cma: sync everything after EBUSY Message-ID: <202206211055.X7Tcbmrt-lkp@intel.com> References: <20220615021504.23358-1-edwardwu@realtek.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20220615021504.23358-1-edwardwu@realtek.com> ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; imf17.hostedemail.com; dkim=pass header.d=intel.com header.s=Intel header.b=mvPK3n50; dmarc=pass (policy=none) header.from=intel.com; spf=none (imf17.hostedemail.com: domain of lkp@intel.com has no SPF policy when checking 192.55.52.151) smtp.mailfrom=lkp@intel.com ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=hostedemail.com; s=arc-20220608; t=1655779180; h=from:from:sender:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date: message-id:message-id:to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version: content-type:content-type:content-transfer-encoding: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references:dkim-signature; bh=Es/DDzWuMCxk3dkgQUwkqk52Rd/+GwokGA+X8OkByow=; b=hk41Hv4+q251pCmNtaG37KbKn7QTTBvu8l4uyNK9bP6mlKNWM+lPOIL240OuMIOzo4tIfh FD6duAEmnVfgtjhFRSQLihz4DzxMYHKiKud1UN8WS8Th+JAHfXAcPViHc5EiJEttUvtZlC 56ibZQPbE4I9WuTorQ7q+izOxrkC6uU= ARC-Seal: i=1; s=arc-20220608; d=hostedemail.com; t=1655779180; a=rsa-sha256; cv=none; b=H+6yVnV+qAeiQ0DC/ZpM7hYgZPVtEANvGVmOPfkkCvG0/1ibw+enRTqdaXoWn/L8MXLt0C YlTlzsvDRgERbRCC/Nb+FJ7otNLaE29WnuFtVyAHIVpC40m4LMj6qTEUKL32AOFoFk5MIx ay3iu4wPt482NOwT6Px1aMKGQ2v1nLM= X-Stat-Signature: s44fzx886umda3hpkqgkx5r7k5w7n7oy X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 2321B40084 X-Rspam-User: Authentication-Results: imf17.hostedemail.com; dkim=pass header.d=intel.com header.s=Intel header.b=mvPK3n50; dmarc=pass (policy=none) header.from=intel.com; spf=none (imf17.hostedemail.com: domain of lkp@intel.com has no SPF policy when checking 192.55.52.151) smtp.mailfrom=lkp@intel.com X-Rspamd-Server: rspam10 X-HE-Tag: 1655779176-351344 X-Bogosity: Ham, tests=bogofilter, spamicity=0.000000, version=1.2.4 Sender: owner-linux-mm@kvack.org Precedence: bulk X-Loop: owner-majordomo@kvack.org List-ID: Hi Edward, Thank you for the patch! Perhaps something to improve: [auto build test WARNING on akpm-mm/mm-everything] url: https://github.com/intel-lab-lkp/linux/commits/Edward-Wu/mm-cma-sync-everything-after-EBUSY/20220615-101716 base: https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/akpm/mm.git mm-everything config: x86_64-randconfig-s022 (https://download.01.org/0day-ci/archive/20220621/202206211055.X7Tcbmrt-lkp@intel.com/config) compiler: gcc-11 (Debian 11.3.0-3) 11.3.0 reproduce: # apt-get install sparse # sparse version: v0.6.4-30-g92122700-dirty # https://github.com/intel-lab-lkp/linux/commit/ef04552ed13eb371365fcc55c7ae1e5c3c211168 git remote add linux-review https://github.com/intel-lab-lkp/linux git fetch --no-tags linux-review Edward-Wu/mm-cma-sync-everything-after-EBUSY/20220615-101716 git checkout ef04552ed13eb371365fcc55c7ae1e5c3c211168 # save the config file mkdir build_dir && cp config build_dir/.config make W=1 C=1 CF='-fdiagnostic-prefix -D__CHECK_ENDIAN__' O=build_dir ARCH=x86_64 SHELL=/bin/bash If you fix the issue, kindly add following tag where applicable Reported-by: kernel test robot sparse warnings: (new ones prefixed by >>) >> mm/cma.c:415:6: sparse: sparse: symbol 'cma_sync_work' was not declared. Should it be static? >> mm/cma.c:422:6: sparse: sparse: symbol 'cma_ebusy_sync_pinned_pages' was not declared. Should it be static? -- 0-DAY CI Kernel Test Service https://01.org/lkp