From: Kent Overstreet <kent.overstreet@gmail.com>
To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org, pmladek@suse.com
Cc: Kent Overstreet <kent.overstreet@gmail.com>,
rostedt@goodmis.org, enozhatsky@chromium.org,
linux@rasmusvillemoes.dk, willy@infradead.org
Subject: [PATCH v4 22/34] vsprintf: Refactor hex_string, bitmap_string_list, bitmap_string
Date: Sun, 19 Jun 2022 20:42:21 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20220620004233.3805-23-kent.overstreet@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20220620004233.3805-1-kent.overstreet@gmail.com>
This patch cleans up printf_spec handling: these functions only use
spec.field_width and they do not interpret it in the normal way -
instead it's a number of bits/bytes passed in to print, so these
functions are changed to take that parameter directly.
Signed-off-by: Kent Overstreet <kent.overstreet@gmail.com>
---
lib/vsprintf.c | 60 +++++++++++++++++++++++---------------------------
1 file changed, 28 insertions(+), 32 deletions(-)
diff --git a/lib/vsprintf.c b/lib/vsprintf.c
index 7f47533ed8..fcdf187b21 100644
--- a/lib/vsprintf.c
+++ b/lib/vsprintf.c
@@ -53,6 +53,7 @@
#include <asm/unaligned.h>
#include <linux/string_helpers.h>
+#include <linux/pretty-printers.h>
#include "kstrtox.h"
/* Disable pointer hashing if requested */
@@ -1151,18 +1152,23 @@ void resource_string(struct printbuf *out, struct resource *res,
}
static noinline_for_stack
-void hex_string(struct printbuf *out, u8 *addr,
- struct printf_spec spec, const char *fmt)
+void hex_string(struct printbuf *out, const u8 *addr,
+ int len, const char *fmt)
{
- int i, len = 1; /* if we pass '%ph[CDN]', field width remains
- negative value, fallback to the default */
char separator;
- if (spec.field_width == 0)
- /* nothing to print */
+ /* nothing to print */
+ if (len == 0)
return;
- if (check_pointer_spec(out, addr, spec))
+ /* if we pass '%ph[CDN]', field width remains
+ negative value, fallback to the default */
+ if (len < 0)
+ len = 1;
+
+ len = min(len, 64);
+
+ if (check_pointer(out, addr))
return;
switch (fmt[1]) {
@@ -1180,34 +1186,21 @@ void hex_string(struct printbuf *out, u8 *addr,
break;
}
- if (spec.field_width > 0)
- len = min_t(int, spec.field_width, 64);
-
- for (i = 0; i < len; ++i) {
- __prt_char(out, hex_asc_hi(addr[i]));
- __prt_char(out, hex_asc_lo(addr[i]));
-
- if (separator && i != len - 1)
- __prt_char(out, separator);
- }
-
- printbuf_nul_terminate(out);
+ prt_hex_bytes(out, addr, len, 1, separator);
}
static noinline_for_stack
-void bitmap_string(struct printbuf *out, unsigned long *bitmap,
- struct printf_spec spec, const char *fmt)
+void bitmap_string(struct printbuf *out, unsigned long *bitmap, int nr_bits)
{
+ struct printf_spec spec = { .flags = SMALL | ZEROPAD, .base = 16 };
const int CHUNKSZ = 32;
- int nr_bits = max_t(int, spec.field_width, 0);
int i, chunksz;
bool first = true;
- if (check_pointer_spec(out, bitmap, spec))
- return;
+ nr_bits = max(nr_bits, 0);
- /* reused to print numbers */
- spec = (struct printf_spec){ .flags = SMALL | ZEROPAD, .base = 16 };
+ if (check_pointer(out, bitmap))
+ return;
chunksz = nr_bits & (CHUNKSZ - 1);
if (chunksz == 0)
@@ -1236,13 +1229,14 @@ void bitmap_string(struct printbuf *out, unsigned long *bitmap,
static noinline_for_stack
void bitmap_list_string(struct printbuf *out, unsigned long *bitmap,
- struct printf_spec spec, const char *fmt)
+ int nr_bits)
{
- int nr_bits = max_t(int, spec.field_width, 0);
bool first = true;
int rbot, rtop;
- if (check_pointer_spec(out, bitmap, spec))
+ nr_bits = max(nr_bits, 0);
+
+ if (check_pointer(out, bitmap))
return ;
for_each_set_bitrange(rbot, rtop, bitmap, nr_bits) {
@@ -2257,13 +2251,15 @@ void pointer(struct printbuf *out, const char *fmt,
resource_string(out, ptr, fmt[0] == 'R');
return do_width_precision(out, prev_pos, spec);
case 'h':
- return hex_string(out, ptr, spec, fmt);
+ /* Uses field_width but _not_ as field size */
+ return hex_string(out, ptr, spec.field_width, fmt);
case 'b':
+ /* Uses field_width but _not_ as field size */
switch (fmt[1]) {
case 'l':
- return bitmap_list_string(out, ptr, spec, fmt);
+ return bitmap_list_string(out, ptr, spec.field_width);
default:
- return bitmap_string(out, ptr, spec, fmt);
+ return bitmap_string(out, ptr, spec.field_width);
}
case 'M': /* Colon separated: 00:01:02:03:04:05 */
case 'm': /* Contiguous: 000102030405 */
--
2.36.1
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2022-06-20 0:43 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 85+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2022-06-20 0:41 [PATCH v4 00/34] Printbufs - new data structure for building strings Kent Overstreet
2022-06-20 0:42 ` [PATCH v4 01/34] lib/printbuf: New data structure for printing strings Kent Overstreet
2022-06-20 4:44 ` David Laight
2022-06-20 15:30 ` Kent Overstreet
2022-06-20 15:53 ` David Laight
2022-06-20 16:14 ` Kent Overstreet
2022-06-20 0:42 ` [PATCH v4 02/34] lib/string_helpers: Convert string_escape_mem() to printbuf Kent Overstreet
2022-06-20 0:42 ` [PATCH v4 03/34] vsprintf: Convert " Kent Overstreet
2022-06-20 0:42 ` [PATCH v4 04/34] lib/hexdump: " Kent Overstreet
2022-06-20 0:42 ` [PATCH v4 05/34] vsprintf: %pf(%p) Kent Overstreet
2022-06-21 7:04 ` Rasmus Villemoes
2022-06-21 7:51 ` Kent Overstreet
2022-06-21 8:47 ` Rasmus Villemoes
2022-06-21 11:11 ` David Laight
2022-06-20 0:42 ` [PATCH v4 06/34] lib/string_helpers: string_get_size() now returns characters wrote Kent Overstreet
2022-06-20 0:42 ` [PATCH v4 07/34] lib/printbuf: Heap allocation Kent Overstreet
2022-06-21 7:58 ` Rasmus Villemoes
2022-06-20 0:42 ` [PATCH v4 08/34] lib/printbuf: Tabstops, indenting Kent Overstreet
2022-06-21 8:14 ` Rasmus Villemoes
2022-06-20 0:42 ` [PATCH v4 09/34] lib/printbuf: Unit specifiers Kent Overstreet
2022-06-20 0:42 ` [PATCH v4 10/34] lib/pretty-printers: prt_string_option(), prt_bitflags() Kent Overstreet
2022-06-20 0:42 ` [PATCH v4 11/34] vsprintf: Improve number() Kent Overstreet
2022-06-21 8:33 ` Rasmus Villemoes
2022-06-20 0:42 ` [PATCH v4 12/34] vsprintf: prt_u64_minwidth(), prt_u64() Kent Overstreet
2022-06-20 0:42 ` [PATCH v4 13/34] test_printf: Drop requirement that sprintf not write past nul Kent Overstreet
2022-06-21 7:19 ` Rasmus Villemoes
2022-06-21 7:52 ` Kent Overstreet
2022-06-20 0:42 ` [PATCH v4 14/34] vsprintf: Start consolidating printf_spec handling Kent Overstreet
2022-06-20 0:42 ` [PATCH v4 15/34] vsprintf: Refactor resource_string() Kent Overstreet
2022-06-20 0:42 ` [PATCH v4 16/34] vsprintf: Refactor fourcc_string() Kent Overstreet
2022-06-20 0:42 ` [PATCH v4 17/34] vsprintf: Refactor ip_addr_string() Kent Overstreet
2022-06-20 0:42 ` [PATCH v4 18/34] vsprintf: Refactor mac_address_string() Kent Overstreet
2022-06-20 0:42 ` [PATCH v4 19/34] vsprintf: time_and_date() no longer takes printf_spec Kent Overstreet
2022-06-20 0:42 ` [PATCH v4 20/34] vsprintf: flags_string() " Kent Overstreet
2022-06-20 0:42 ` [PATCH v4 21/34] vsprintf: Refactor device_node_string, fwnode_string Kent Overstreet
2022-06-20 0:42 ` Kent Overstreet [this message]
2022-06-20 0:42 ` [PATCH v4 23/34] Input/joystick/analog: Convert from seq_buf -> printbuf Kent Overstreet
2022-06-20 0:42 ` [PATCH v4 24/34] mm/memcontrol.c: Convert to printbuf Kent Overstreet
2022-06-20 11:37 ` Michal Hocko
2022-06-20 15:13 ` Kent Overstreet
2022-06-20 15:52 ` Michal Hocko
2022-06-20 0:42 ` [PATCH v4 25/34] clk: tegra: bpmp: " Kent Overstreet
2022-06-20 0:42 ` [PATCH v4 26/34] tools/testing/nvdimm: " Kent Overstreet
2022-06-24 19:32 ` Dan Williams
2022-06-24 23:42 ` Santosh Sivaraj
2022-07-01 6:32 ` Shivaprasad G Bhat
2022-06-20 0:42 ` [PATCH v4 27/34] powerpc: " Kent Overstreet
2022-06-20 0:42 ` [PATCH v4 28/34] x86/resctrl: " Kent Overstreet
2022-06-20 0:42 ` [PATCH v4 29/34] PCI/P2PDMA: " Kent Overstreet
2022-06-20 0:42 ` [PATCH v4 30/34] tracing: trace_events_synth: " Kent Overstreet
2022-06-20 0:42 ` [PATCH v4 31/34] d_path: prt_path() Kent Overstreet
2022-06-20 0:42 ` [PATCH v4 32/34] ACPI/APEI: Add missing include Kent Overstreet
2022-06-20 0:42 ` [PATCH v4 33/34] tracing: Convert to printbuf Kent Overstreet
2022-06-20 0:42 ` [PATCH v4 34/34] Delete seq_buf Kent Overstreet
2022-06-20 4:19 ` [PATCH v4 00/34] Printbufs - new data structure for building strings David Laight
2022-06-20 4:54 ` Matthew Wilcox
2022-06-20 8:00 ` David Laight
2022-06-20 15:07 ` Kent Overstreet
2022-06-20 15:21 ` David Laight
2022-06-21 0:38 ` Joe Perches
2022-06-21 0:57 ` Kent Overstreet
2022-06-21 1:26 ` Joe Perches
2022-06-21 2:10 ` Joe Perches
2022-06-26 19:53 ` [RFC[ Alloc in vsprintf Joe Perches
2022-06-26 20:06 ` Kent Overstreet
2022-06-26 20:13 ` Joe Perches
2022-06-26 20:19 ` Linus Torvalds
2022-06-26 20:39 ` Joe Perches
2022-06-26 20:51 ` Kent Overstreet
2022-06-26 21:02 ` Joe Perches
2022-06-26 21:10 ` Kent Overstreet
2022-06-26 20:54 ` Linus Torvalds
2022-06-27 8:25 ` David Laight
2022-06-28 2:56 ` Kent Overstreet
2022-06-21 2:31 ` [PATCH v4 00/34] Printbufs - new data structure for building strings Kent Overstreet
2022-06-21 3:11 ` Kent Overstreet
2022-06-21 6:11 ` Rasmus Villemoes
2022-06-21 8:01 ` Kent Overstreet
2022-07-19 23:15 ` Steven Rostedt
2022-07-19 23:43 ` Kent Overstreet
2022-07-20 0:05 ` Steven Rostedt
2022-07-20 0:17 ` Kent Overstreet
2022-07-20 1:11 ` Steven Rostedt
2022-07-20 1:31 ` Kent Overstreet
2022-07-20 1:37 ` Steven Rostedt
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20220620004233.3805-23-kent.overstreet@gmail.com \
--to=kent.overstreet@gmail.com \
--cc=enozhatsky@chromium.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=linux@rasmusvillemoes.dk \
--cc=pmladek@suse.com \
--cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
--cc=willy@infradead.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox