From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from kanga.kvack.org (kanga.kvack.org [205.233.56.17]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0B005C433EF for ; Thu, 16 Jun 2022 08:49:00 +0000 (UTC) Received: by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix) id 76C156B0072; Thu, 16 Jun 2022 04:49:00 -0400 (EDT) Received: by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix, from userid 40) id 71CE86B0074; Thu, 16 Jun 2022 04:49:00 -0400 (EDT) X-Delivered-To: int-list-linux-mm@kvack.org Received: by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix, from userid 63042) id 5E3FC6B0075; Thu, 16 Jun 2022 04:49:00 -0400 (EDT) X-Delivered-To: linux-mm@kvack.org Received: from relay.hostedemail.com (smtprelay0010.hostedemail.com [216.40.44.10]) by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4CC666B0072 for ; Thu, 16 Jun 2022 04:49:00 -0400 (EDT) Received: from smtpin17.hostedemail.com (a10.router.float.18 [10.200.18.1]) by unirelay08.hostedemail.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1BDFB2160F for ; Thu, 16 Jun 2022 08:49:00 +0000 (UTC) X-FDA: 79583474040.17.DD03351 Received: from mga04.intel.com (mga04.intel.com [192.55.52.120]) by imf16.hostedemail.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0EE8318001E for ; Thu, 16 Jun 2022 08:48:58 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=intel.com; i=@intel.com; q=dns/txt; s=Intel; t=1655369339; x=1686905339; h=date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references: mime-version:in-reply-to; bh=J1gdiJA41T2Z2wOi3LUY95qiuypvu+H6Osn9BPErGMQ=; b=T0+FoLb2PDUDplTtn0ocN4THP4TJG8gvXgUsZ+KU9gTHB5MprIOFEUIs JUWmTwOKfCx0ATIXaYW+uZGMkMWrVTuclvXVzCaMx1NbeY9pZdV+8MHTQ BPdJOUARTA2seYJmW4eydmF6bjV0mAjNKbk+/4/ifc1iGvCM57oMMQCD9 XNZZf4tUibUcXDj93pC+NUPdCE0qpbRZIj54p2mEm3yZZYLOeyAO1r+7q yeH6mecC2oM3ipGNDHCABX9MXmpqLEfaFLbj/RKHnm53WwI2lqU2cN8Oz yG+MFml2glVdTOsN7jXshjLzZZJ4l92LXmaiWF9rVRU5i1DkMw0pr9PkW w==; X-IronPort-AV: E=McAfee;i="6400,9594,10379"; a="277998696" X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.91,304,1647327600"; d="scan'208";a="277998696" Received: from orsmga006.jf.intel.com ([10.7.209.51]) by fmsmga104.fm.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 16 Jun 2022 01:48:55 -0700 X-ExtLoop1: 1 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.91,304,1647327600"; d="scan'208";a="559661238" Received: from lkp-server01.sh.intel.com (HELO 60dabacc1df6) ([10.239.97.150]) by orsmga006.jf.intel.com with ESMTP; 16 Jun 2022 01:48:52 -0700 Received: from kbuild by 60dabacc1df6 with local (Exim 4.95) (envelope-from ) id 1o1lBM-000ODb-AZ; Thu, 16 Jun 2022 08:48:52 +0000 Date: Thu, 16 Jun 2022 16:47:53 +0800 From: kernel test robot To: Baolin Wang , mike.kravetz@oracle.com Cc: kbuild-all@lists.01.org, songmuchun@bytedance.com, akpm@linux-foundation.org, catalin.marinas@arm.com, will@kernel.org, anshuman.khandual@arm.com, baolin.wang@linux.alibaba.com, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org Subject: Re: [PATCH] arm64/hugetlb: Implement arm64 specific hugetlb_mask_last_hp Message-ID: <202206161633.yB7NR9sh-lkp@intel.com> References: <7256dbe078d7231f45b0f47c2c52a3bd3aa10da7.1655350193.git.baolin.wang@linux.alibaba.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <7256dbe078d7231f45b0f47c2c52a3bd3aa10da7.1655350193.git.baolin.wang@linux.alibaba.com> ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; imf16.hostedemail.com; dkim=pass header.d=intel.com header.s=Intel header.b=T0+FoLb2; dmarc=pass (policy=none) header.from=intel.com; spf=none (imf16.hostedemail.com: domain of lkp@intel.com has no SPF policy when checking 192.55.52.120) smtp.mailfrom=lkp@intel.com ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=hostedemail.com; s=arc-20220608; t=1655369339; h=from:from:sender:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date: message-id:message-id:to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version: content-type:content-type:content-transfer-encoding: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references:dkim-signature; bh=FpXMXu3TdBFmix8XAPskxbMXw2OOztgdMzB04MgjwYA=; b=QQjIFnh6dzFRM5ZR64ZACR4tLl9YAwnZ9whbD0wYv6Rbe0AyO2ZaIRwPPdpXklSkFFuEuN m1dpv8ABlYhZ8pXPWWSB0WqyAG8W076Oz7mXF9/z7pirPIgqB3d908pVhRPQ5Yplar7Qol JCjs1L1XU+2jreKnfcox6+MJPQmkP9g= ARC-Seal: i=1; s=arc-20220608; d=hostedemail.com; t=1655369339; a=rsa-sha256; cv=none; b=SecWxMwAAwXBJjCCnJy7Ms1NnZurP4No581IJ+Db2S0dwhSaYFmY8CDC8x8vgbrz5uX+wZ brLM0Ym7Y4W5p31704e0qc29fwfqwwROolw17QoFsqOkUAolE4wakymCKJunK3HIygx4rD gfJlV+yaaEByol7aEfVTVQUz1DdP3Zk= X-Stat-Signature: j6ifracg3awfp81bs7khjzq3cgs38xog X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 0EE8318001E X-Rspam-User: Authentication-Results: imf16.hostedemail.com; dkim=pass header.d=intel.com header.s=Intel header.b=T0+FoLb2; dmarc=pass (policy=none) header.from=intel.com; spf=none (imf16.hostedemail.com: domain of lkp@intel.com has no SPF policy when checking 192.55.52.120) smtp.mailfrom=lkp@intel.com X-Rspamd-Server: rspam10 X-HE-Tag: 1655369338-931123 X-Bogosity: Ham, tests=bogofilter, spamicity=0.000000, version=1.2.4 Sender: owner-linux-mm@kvack.org Precedence: bulk X-Loop: owner-majordomo@kvack.org List-ID: Hi Baolin, I love your patch! Perhaps something to improve: [auto build test WARNING on arm64/for-next/core] [also build test WARNING on linus/master] [If your patch is applied to the wrong git tree, kindly drop us a note. And when submitting patch, we suggest to use '--base' as documented in https://git-scm.com/docs/git-format-patch] url: https://github.com/intel-lab-lkp/linux/commits/Baolin-Wang/arm64-hugetlb-Implement-arm64-specific-hugetlb_mask_last_hp/20220616-113640 base: https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/arm64/linux.git for-next/core config: arm64-allyesconfig (https://download.01.org/0day-ci/archive/20220616/202206161633.yB7NR9sh-lkp@intel.com/config) compiler: aarch64-linux-gcc (GCC) 11.3.0 reproduce (this is a W=1 build): wget https://raw.githubusercontent.com/intel/lkp-tests/master/sbin/make.cross -O ~/bin/make.cross chmod +x ~/bin/make.cross # https://github.com/intel-lab-lkp/linux/commit/f1309dfbc2b70ec5dd72ac38e95a49b7be42b9b6 git remote add linux-review https://github.com/intel-lab-lkp/linux git fetch --no-tags linux-review Baolin-Wang/arm64-hugetlb-Implement-arm64-specific-hugetlb_mask_last_hp/20220616-113640 git checkout f1309dfbc2b70ec5dd72ac38e95a49b7be42b9b6 # save the config file mkdir build_dir && cp config build_dir/.config COMPILER_INSTALL_PATH=$HOME/0day COMPILER=gcc-11.3.0 make.cross W=1 O=build_dir ARCH=arm64 SHELL=/bin/bash arch/arm64/mm/ If you fix the issue, kindly add following tag where applicable Reported-by: kernel test robot All warnings (new ones prefixed by >>): >> arch/arm64/mm/hugetlbpage.c:371:15: warning: no previous prototype for 'hugetlb_mask_last_hp' [-Wmissing-prototypes] 371 | unsigned long hugetlb_mask_last_hp(struct hstate *h) | ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ vim +/hugetlb_mask_last_hp +371 arch/arm64/mm/hugetlbpage.c 370 > 371 unsigned long hugetlb_mask_last_hp(struct hstate *h) 372 { 373 unsigned long hp_size = huge_page_size(h); 374 375 switch (hp_size) { 376 case PUD_SIZE: 377 return PGDIR_SIZE - PUD_SIZE; 378 case CONT_PMD_SIZE: 379 return PUD_SIZE - CONT_PMD_SIZE; 380 case PMD_SIZE: 381 return PUD_SIZE - PMD_SIZE; 382 case CONT_PTE_SIZE: 383 return PMD_SIZE - CONT_PTE_SIZE; 384 default: 385 break; 386 } 387 388 return ~0UL; 389 } 390 -- 0-DAY CI Kernel Test Service https://01.org/lkp