linux-mm.kvack.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: <wang.yi59@zte.com.cn>
To: <yury.norov@gmail.com>
Cc: <akpm@linux-foundation.org>, <linux-mm@kvack.org>,
	<andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com>, <linux@rasmusvillemoes.dk>,
	<linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>, <xue.zhihong@zte.com.cn>,
	<wang.liang82@zte.com.cn>, <Liu.Jianjun3@zte.com.cn>,
	<yury.norov@gmail.com>
Subject: Re:[PATCH] bitmap: fix a unproper remap when mpol_rebind_nodemask()
Date: Wed, 15 Jun 2022 16:54:47 +0800 (CST)	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <202206151654471905256@zte.com.cn> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAAH8bW_GCviYSadmf5CUxgJixkXbq+SfL63ZJt7Lsm9OAmPjVQ@mail.gmail.com>

> On Mon, Jun 13, 2022 at 8:45 PM <wang.yi59@zte.com.cn> wrote:
> >
> >
> > - change the bitmap_remap() as this patch did, but this changed the
> > behavior of this routine which looks does the right thing. One good
> > news is this function is only called by mpol_rebind_nodemask().
> 
> There are users of bitmap_remap() in drivers/gpio/gpio-xilinx.c
> 
> > - don't change the bitmap_remap(), to be honest, I didn't figure out
> > a way. Any suggestions?
> 
> I haven't had a chance to play with it (because of my dayjob), but I
> have a strong feeling that the proper solution should come from
> existing functionality.
> 
> Did you experiment with MPOL_F_{STATIC,RELATIVE}_NODES?
> Those flags enable nodes_and() and mpol_relative_nodemask()
> paths correspondingly.
> 

You are right, adding MPOL_F_STATIC_NODES can fix this situation. So it
seems that we don't need to do anything in kernel now.

Many thanks for your time :)


> What I suggested is:
> 
>  328                 node_clear(1, pol->w.cpuset_mems_allowed);
>  329                 node_clear(3, pol->w.cpuset_mems_allowed);
>  330                 nodes_remap(tmp, pol->nodes, pol->w.cpuset_mems_allowed,
>  331                                                                 *nodes);
>  332                 pol->w.cpuset_mems_allowed = *nodes;
> 
> > In the example above, if set cpuset.mems to 0,2 firstly, the nodes
> > binds will change from 1 to 2. And then set cpuset.mems to 1,3, it will
> > change from 2 to 3 again.


---
Best wishes
Yi Wang


      parent reply	other threads:[~2022-06-15  8:55 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
     [not found] <CAAH8bW8wD_hsOqtWa-g_1SNWNi7GHzsu9RvL8feY069JPKFWBA@mail.gmail.com>
     [not found] ` <202206141145339651323@zte.com.cn>
2022-06-14 16:40   ` [PATCH] " Yury Norov
2022-06-14 16:50     ` Andy Shevchenko
2022-06-15  8:54     ` wang.yi59 [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=202206151654471905256@zte.com.cn \
    --to=wang.yi59@zte.com.cn \
    --cc=Liu.Jianjun3@zte.com.cn \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
    --cc=linux@rasmusvillemoes.dk \
    --cc=wang.liang82@zte.com.cn \
    --cc=xue.zhihong@zte.com.cn \
    --cc=yury.norov@gmail.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox