From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from kanga.kvack.org (kanga.kvack.org [205.233.56.17]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C86FCC43334 for ; Wed, 15 Jun 2022 10:33:26 +0000 (UTC) Received: by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix) id 5EA576B0072; Wed, 15 Jun 2022 06:33:26 -0400 (EDT) Received: by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix, from userid 40) id 599316B0074; Wed, 15 Jun 2022 06:33:26 -0400 (EDT) X-Delivered-To: int-list-linux-mm@kvack.org Received: by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix, from userid 63042) id 4883F6B0075; Wed, 15 Jun 2022 06:33:26 -0400 (EDT) X-Delivered-To: linux-mm@kvack.org Received: from relay.hostedemail.com (smtprelay0016.hostedemail.com [216.40.44.16]) by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 39CD46B0072 for ; Wed, 15 Jun 2022 06:33:26 -0400 (EDT) Received: from smtpin07.hostedemail.com (a10.router.float.18 [10.200.18.1]) by unirelay12.hostedemail.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0F61D12141D for ; Wed, 15 Jun 2022 10:33:26 +0000 (UTC) X-FDA: 79580108412.07.95F8B5C Received: from szxga03-in.huawei.com (szxga03-in.huawei.com [45.249.212.189]) by imf07.hostedemail.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B3DC440079 for ; Wed, 15 Jun 2022 10:33:24 +0000 (UTC) Received: from kwepemi500016.china.huawei.com (unknown [172.30.72.53]) by szxga03-in.huawei.com (SkyGuard) with ESMTP id 4LNM862vtmzDrDr; Wed, 15 Jun 2022 18:32:54 +0800 (CST) Received: from huawei.com (10.175.112.208) by kwepemi500016.china.huawei.com (7.221.188.220) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_128_GCM_SHA256) id 15.1.2375.24; Wed, 15 Jun 2022 18:33:19 +0800 From: Zhou Guanghui To: , , , , CC: , , , , Subject: [PATCH v5] memblock,arm64: Expand the static memblock memory table Date: Wed, 15 Jun 2022 10:27:42 +0000 Message-ID: <20220615102742.96450-1-zhouguanghui1@huawei.com> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.17.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Originating-IP: [10.175.112.208] X-ClientProxiedBy: dggems705-chm.china.huawei.com (10.3.19.182) To kwepemi500016.china.huawei.com (7.221.188.220) X-CFilter-Loop: Reflected ARC-Seal: i=1; s=arc-20220608; d=hostedemail.com; t=1655289205; a=rsa-sha256; cv=none; b=aYVUZGnTuUOgImv1wJR9iUrFFJEt2UFm3Jp2nflg9UP7CT0HGpTMWtPWmB/QJ2P/Gb5y+N fYxBhIUcn/iHMAqILMbv27Oux/Am+ZM8fjQVyCNrun58VYhRi3A5Mtctd4LOMOm3uCr+a9 DSp7aqrbdlXivAJ+3FYLcbkzYZLt4Hc= ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; imf07.hostedemail.com; dkim=none; dmarc=pass (policy=quarantine) header.from=huawei.com; spf=pass (imf07.hostedemail.com: domain of zhouguanghui1@huawei.com designates 45.249.212.189 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=zhouguanghui1@huawei.com ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=hostedemail.com; s=arc-20220608; t=1655289205; h=from:from:sender:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date: message-id:message-id:to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version: content-type:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:in-reply-to: references; bh=td/Yzf9MNvnz2iBWr/3TinaafGqiHGrlkFv+oV/TDUg=; b=W0F/h29B3y8G4xtvV38xPjHhgf5hTC+e7OnbIzum9xEP0CUrdqqTwAQ2oMPfXKlknhNG2B pETZT/wOBGkgdG67IJvxEuG3P5BMBpYeZd52Ot08Tdsg8IkjxUr85SDdaXc/ukig1wGgCr Z5LBeEZpaLhR/xqekYKBz9S4goxbAt4= X-Rspamd-Server: rspam03 X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: B3DC440079 X-Stat-Signature: 13rqtsn31acwzubu43qfgdx54u6it9rz Authentication-Results: imf07.hostedemail.com; dkim=none; dmarc=pass (policy=quarantine) header.from=huawei.com; spf=pass (imf07.hostedemail.com: domain of zhouguanghui1@huawei.com designates 45.249.212.189 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=zhouguanghui1@huawei.com X-Rspam-User: X-HE-Tag: 1655289204-393960 X-Bogosity: Ham, tests=bogofilter, spamicity=0.000000, version=1.2.4 Sender: owner-linux-mm@kvack.org Precedence: bulk X-Loop: owner-majordomo@kvack.org List-ID: In a system(Huawei Ascend ARM64 SoC) using HBM, a multi-bit ECC error occurs, and the BIOS will mark the corresponding area (for example, 2 MB) as unusable. When the system restarts next time, these areas are not reported or reported as EFI_UNUSABLE_MEMORY. Both cases lead to an increase in the number of memblocks, whereas EFI_UNUSABLE_MEMORY leads to a larger number of memblocks. For example, if the EFI_UNUSABLE_MEMORY type is reported: ... memory[0x92] [0x0000200834a00000-0x0000200835bfffff], 0x0000000001200000 bytes on node 7 flags: 0x0 memory[0x93] [0x0000200835c00000-0x0000200835dfffff], 0x0000000000200000 bytes on node 7 flags: 0x4 memory[0x94] [0x0000200835e00000-0x00002008367fffff], 0x0000000000a00000 bytes on node 7 flags: 0x0 memory[0x95] [0x0000200836800000-0x00002008369fffff], 0x0000000000200000 bytes on node 7 flags: 0x4 memory[0x96] [0x0000200836a00000-0x0000200837bfffff], 0x0000000001200000 bytes on node 7 flags: 0x0 memory[0x97] [0x0000200837c00000-0x0000200837dfffff], 0x0000000000200000 bytes on node 7 flags: 0x4 memory[0x98] [0x0000200837e00000-0x000020087fffffff], 0x0000000048200000 bytes on node 7 flags: 0x0 memory[0x99] [0x0000200880000000-0x0000200bcfffffff], 0x0000000350000000 bytes on node 6 flags: 0x0 memory[0x9a] [0x0000200bd0000000-0x0000200bd01fffff], 0x0000000000200000 bytes on node 6 flags: 0x4 memory[0x9b] [0x0000200bd0200000-0x0000200bd07fffff], 0x0000000000600000 bytes on node 6 flags: 0x0 memory[0x9c] [0x0000200bd0800000-0x0000200bd09fffff], 0x0000000000200000 bytes on node 6 flags: 0x4 memory[0x9d] [0x0000200bd0a00000-0x0000200fcfffffff], 0x00000003ff600000 bytes on node 6 flags: 0x0 memory[0x9e] [0x0000200fd0000000-0x0000200fd01fffff], 0x0000000000200000 bytes on node 6 flags: 0x4 memory[0x9f] [0x0000200fd0200000-0x0000200fffffffff], 0x000000002fe00000 bytes on node 6 flags: 0x0 ... The EFI memory map is parsed to construct the memblock arrays before the memblock arrays can be resized. As the result, memory regions beyond INIT_MEMBLOCK_REGIONS are lost. Add a new macro INIT_MEMBLOCK_MEMORY_REGTIONS to replace INIT_MEMBLOCK_REGTIONS to define the size of the static memblock.memory array. Allow overriding memblock.memory array size with architecture defined INIT_MEMBLOCK_MEMORY_REGIONS and make arm64 to set INIT_MEMBLOCK_MEMORY_REGIONS to 1024 when CONFIG_EFI is enabled. Signed-off-by: Zhou Guanghui Acked-by: Mike Rapoport Tested-by: Darren Hart --- arch/arm64/include/asm/memory.h | 9 +++++++++ mm/memblock.c | 14 +++++++++----- 2 files changed, 18 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-) diff --git a/arch/arm64/include/asm/memory.h b/arch/arm64/include/asm/memory.h index 0af70d9abede..ce8614fa376a 100644 --- a/arch/arm64/include/asm/memory.h +++ b/arch/arm64/include/asm/memory.h @@ -364,6 +364,15 @@ void dump_mem_limit(void); # define INIT_MEMBLOCK_RESERVED_REGIONS (INIT_MEMBLOCK_REGIONS + NR_CPUS + 1) #endif +/* + * memory regions which marked with flag MEMBLOCK_NOMAP(for example, the memory + * of the EFI_UNUSABLE_MEMORY type) may divide a continuous memory block into + * multiple parts. As a result, the number of memory regions is large. + */ +#ifdef CONFIG_EFI +#define INIT_MEMBLOCK_MEMORY_REGIONS (INIT_MEMBLOCK_REGIONS * 8) +#endif + #include #endif /* __ASM_MEMORY_H */ diff --git a/mm/memblock.c b/mm/memblock.c index e4f03a6e8e56..7c63571a69d7 100644 --- a/mm/memblock.c +++ b/mm/memblock.c @@ -29,6 +29,10 @@ # define INIT_MEMBLOCK_RESERVED_REGIONS INIT_MEMBLOCK_REGIONS #endif +#ifndef INIT_MEMBLOCK_MEMORY_REGIONS +#define INIT_MEMBLOCK_MEMORY_REGIONS INIT_MEMBLOCK_REGIONS +#endif + /** * DOC: memblock overview * @@ -55,9 +59,9 @@ * the allocator metadata. The "memory" and "reserved" types are nicely * wrapped with struct memblock. This structure is statically * initialized at build time. The region arrays are initially sized to - * %INIT_MEMBLOCK_REGIONS for "memory" and %INIT_MEMBLOCK_RESERVED_REGIONS - * for "reserved". The region array for "physmem" is initially sized to - * %INIT_PHYSMEM_REGIONS. + * %INIT_MEMBLOCK_MEMORY_REGIONS for "memory" and + * %INIT_MEMBLOCK_RESERVED_REGIONS for "reserved". The region array + * for "physmem" is initially sized to %INIT_PHYSMEM_REGIONS. * The memblock_allow_resize() enables automatic resizing of the region * arrays during addition of new regions. This feature should be used * with care so that memory allocated for the region array will not @@ -102,7 +106,7 @@ unsigned long min_low_pfn; unsigned long max_pfn; unsigned long long max_possible_pfn; -static struct memblock_region memblock_memory_init_regions[INIT_MEMBLOCK_REGIONS] __initdata_memblock; +static struct memblock_region memblock_memory_init_regions[INIT_MEMBLOCK_MEMORY_REGIONS] __initdata_memblock; static struct memblock_region memblock_reserved_init_regions[INIT_MEMBLOCK_RESERVED_REGIONS] __initdata_memblock; #ifdef CONFIG_HAVE_MEMBLOCK_PHYS_MAP static struct memblock_region memblock_physmem_init_regions[INIT_PHYSMEM_REGIONS]; @@ -111,7 +115,7 @@ static struct memblock_region memblock_physmem_init_regions[INIT_PHYSMEM_REGIONS struct memblock memblock __initdata_memblock = { .memory.regions = memblock_memory_init_regions, .memory.cnt = 1, /* empty dummy entry */ - .memory.max = INIT_MEMBLOCK_REGIONS, + .memory.max = INIT_MEMBLOCK_MEMORY_REGIONS, .memory.name = "memory", .reserved.regions = memblock_reserved_init_regions, -- 2.17.1