From: Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org>
To: Andrei Vagin <avagin@gmail.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
Dmitry Safonov <0x7f454c46@gmail.com>,
Christian Brauner <brauner@kernel.org>,
Florian Weimer <fweimer@redhat.com>,
linux-mm@kvack.org, Eric Biederman <ebiederm@xmission.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] fs/exec: allow to unshare a time namespace on vfork+exec
Date: Tue, 14 Jun 2022 14:14:35 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <202206141412.2B0732FF6C@keescook> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20220613060723.197407-1-avagin@gmail.com>
On Sun, Jun 12, 2022 at 11:07:22PM -0700, Andrei Vagin wrote:
> Right now, a new process can't be forked in another time namespace
> if it shares mm with its parent. It is prohibited, because each time
> namespace has its own vvar page that is mapped into a process address
> space.
>
> When a process calls exec, it gets a new mm and so it could be "legal"
> to switch time namespace in that case. This was not implemented and
> now if we want to do this, we need to add another clone flag to not
> break backward compatibility.
>
> We don't have any user requests to switch times on exec except the
> vfork+exec combination, so there is no reason to add a new clone flag.
> As for vfork+exec, this should be safe to allow switching timens with
> the current clone flag. Right now, vfork (CLONE_VFORK | CLONE_VM) fails
> if a child is forked into another time namespace. With this change,
> vfork creates a new process in parent's timens, and the following exec
> does the actual switch to the target time namespace.
This seems like a very special case. None of the other namespaces do
this, do they?
How is CLONE_NEWTIME supposed to be used today?
-Kees
--
Kees Cook
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2022-06-14 21:14 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2022-06-13 6:07 Andrei Vagin
2022-06-13 6:07 ` [PATCH 2/2] testing/timens: add a test for vfork+exit Andrei Vagin
2022-06-14 21:14 ` Kees Cook [this message]
2022-06-15 7:52 ` [PATCH 1/2] fs/exec: allow to unshare a time namespace on vfork+exec Christian Brauner
2022-06-15 7:53 ` Florian Weimer
2022-06-15 8:00 ` Christian Brauner
2022-06-15 8:14 ` Florian Weimer
2022-06-15 8:53 ` Christian Brauner
2022-06-15 7:37 ` Christian Brauner
2022-06-15 15:01 ` Kees Cook
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=202206141412.2B0732FF6C@keescook \
--to=keescook@chromium.org \
--cc=0x7f454c46@gmail.com \
--cc=avagin@gmail.com \
--cc=brauner@kernel.org \
--cc=ebiederm@xmission.com \
--cc=fweimer@redhat.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox