From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from kanga.kvack.org (kanga.kvack.org [205.233.56.17]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F03A1C43334 for ; Tue, 7 Jun 2022 06:25:14 +0000 (UTC) Received: by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix) id 545DA6B0074; Tue, 7 Jun 2022 02:25:14 -0400 (EDT) Received: by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix, from userid 40) id 4CECF6B0075; Tue, 7 Jun 2022 02:25:14 -0400 (EDT) X-Delivered-To: int-list-linux-mm@kvack.org Received: by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix, from userid 63042) id 3968E6B007D; Tue, 7 Jun 2022 02:25:14 -0400 (EDT) X-Delivered-To: linux-mm@kvack.org Received: from relay.hostedemail.com (smtprelay0013.hostedemail.com [216.40.44.13]) by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2317B6B0074 for ; Tue, 7 Jun 2022 02:25:14 -0400 (EDT) Received: from smtpin20.hostedemail.com (a10.router.float.18 [10.200.18.1]) by unirelay12.hostedemail.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id EEA66120F49 for ; Tue, 7 Jun 2022 06:25:13 +0000 (UTC) X-FDA: 79550452506.20.C3DEA9B Received: from gandalf.ozlabs.org (gandalf.ozlabs.org [150.107.74.76]) by imf23.hostedemail.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1AE1114002C for ; Tue, 7 Jun 2022 06:24:43 +0000 (UTC) Received: from authenticated.ozlabs.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange ECDHE (P-256) server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by mail.ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 4LHL1s4qR0z4xDH; Tue, 7 Jun 2022 16:25:05 +1000 (AEST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=canb.auug.org.au; s=201702; t=1654583109; bh=TTib3E0eOcKUl5ZzrnNNt+rXzLxviuC4W+trHxRy5Ow=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:In-Reply-To:References:From; b=iizM41FD4imLMhvx5n8bAh/9TnVK21QSe7Mvb5zdjKXSJ6YIKdZQxx5RNCpC+PmZH DVdn7GzyJHS2R8SQ4ubO140yTLkM34lIyLT1TNf0kfQyRn3LSNamnaSxDUtNOwV37d 3M5e5OMeK+DUWyD+vCg/aCHw5cSIFnkHL9pKK8pyrCN6azYAQYh6uQPcpXeV6cpacr ParSo65A57hrRc+/balMOlTpjaq5sNMeVBb6l9h95sTZ8RRgBX9/xSJl7G9Vh3HOWO 0j7P3eQSPsSzgwTDVB5nTVIawk/98zrvBVW6A3sBoL8fkwhmIKWJyZV1OMw6WfUcFR hnyzjgIbAm9LQ== Date: Tue, 7 Jun 2022 16:25:04 +1000 From: Stephen Rothwell To: Naresh Kamboju Cc: Linux-Next Mailing List , open list , regressions@lists.linux.dev, lkft-triage@lists.linaro.org, Linux ARM , linux-mm , Andrew Morton , Ard Biesheuvel , Arnd Bergmann , Catalin Marinas , Raghuram Thammiraju , Mark Brown , Will Deacon , Shakeel Butt , Roman Gushchin , Vasily Averin , Qian Cai Subject: Re: [next] arm64: boot failed - next-20220606 Message-ID: <20220607162504.7fd5a92a@canb.auug.org.au> In-Reply-To: References: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="Sig_/DRSjkCly1lHAR1PZNg3poEP"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg=pgp-sha256 X-Stat-Signature: 8tc6iaw6q6cnohnqx9ewtug63etnhwek X-Rspam-User: Authentication-Results: imf23.hostedemail.com; dkim=pass header.d=canb.auug.org.au header.s=201702 header.b=iizM41FD; spf=pass (imf23.hostedemail.com: domain of sfr@canb.auug.org.au designates 150.107.74.76 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=sfr@canb.auug.org.au; dmarc=none X-Rspamd-Server: rspam04 X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 1AE1114002C X-HE-Tag: 1654583083-427491 X-Bogosity: Ham, tests=bogofilter, spamicity=0.000000, version=1.2.4 Sender: owner-linux-mm@kvack.org Precedence: bulk X-Loop: owner-majordomo@kvack.org List-ID: --Sig_/DRSjkCly1lHAR1PZNg3poEP Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Hi Naresh, On Tue, 7 Jun 2022 11:00:39 +0530 Naresh Kamboju wrote: > > On Mon, 6 Jun 2022 at 17:16, Naresh Kamboju w= rote: > > > > Linux next-20220606 arm64 boot failed. The kernel boot log is empty. > > I am bisecting this problem. > > > > Reported-by: Linux Kernel Functional Testing > > > > The initial investigation show that, > > > > GOOD: next-20220603 > > BAD: next-20220606 > > > > Boot log: > > Starting kernel ... =20 >=20 > Linux next-20220606 and next-20220607 arm64 boot failed. > The kernel panic log showing after earlycon. >=20 > Reported-by: Linux Kernel Functional Testing Can you test v5.19-rc1, please? If that does not fail, then you could bisect between that and next-20220606 ... --=20 Cheers, Stephen Rothwell --Sig_/DRSjkCly1lHAR1PZNg3poEP Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQEzBAEBCAAdFiEENIC96giZ81tWdLgKAVBC80lX0GwFAmKe70AACgkQAVBC80lX 0GzJhwf/fg3MZsNBiav8tAOZc8t4jMCOWqorUXeJ83jXOMTTQ2zvWrii6uTUo9Xd wybSgw08J6x1PyE+1GH/oNLSpMoyzkomnfRUlpHVTq2oARH6tjzRWyVB0e/8GFgS oChUxkr9hz8UBBrV5yj8adSclwyCTMS869R7CkO/g9/ouidyWGGmlLpE+KBb4EUY RxM501ieFo4Goyh9kWe7sUqqx+iCfcMo1lwyd2QYf4Z6BzmDAYA0490AL9Kl+Cdf Slj2Bim1wm8d3Ou8aX9tQRp3G3ZRsolm8+hOhA/BRHiPYETJ/N0KvTqoIa+VXEr1 bgS2E6WIit0Fw4PX9jesiKHmFYPthA== =m7Ts -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --Sig_/DRSjkCly1lHAR1PZNg3poEP--