From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from kanga.kvack.org (kanga.kvack.org [205.233.56.17]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E43E2C43334 for ; Thu, 2 Jun 2022 17:47:09 +0000 (UTC) Received: by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix) id 473166B0071; Thu, 2 Jun 2022 13:47:09 -0400 (EDT) Received: by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix, from userid 40) id 422866B0073; Thu, 2 Jun 2022 13:47:09 -0400 (EDT) X-Delivered-To: int-list-linux-mm@kvack.org Received: by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix, from userid 63042) id 30D236B0074; Thu, 2 Jun 2022 13:47:09 -0400 (EDT) X-Delivered-To: linux-mm@kvack.org Received: from relay.hostedemail.com (smtprelay0016.hostedemail.com [216.40.44.16]) by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 254A46B0071 for ; Thu, 2 Jun 2022 13:47:09 -0400 (EDT) Received: from smtpin06.hostedemail.com (a10.router.float.18 [10.200.18.1]) by unirelay01.hostedemail.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0552660F15 for ; Thu, 2 Jun 2022 17:47:09 +0000 (UTC) X-FDA: 79534026978.06.87D4881 Received: from ams.source.kernel.org (ams.source.kernel.org [145.40.68.75]) by imf26.hostedemail.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id AB7F5140059 for ; Thu, 2 Jun 2022 17:47:03 +0000 (UTC) Received: from smtp.kernel.org (relay.kernel.org [52.25.139.140]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ams.source.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 77485B81FF8; Thu, 2 Jun 2022 17:47:06 +0000 (UTC) Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 920A3C385A5; Thu, 2 Jun 2022 17:47:04 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=linux-foundation.org; s=korg; t=1654192025; bh=wpPoiF86HNO2h+P+3n4vHEbxR9x6vf8QrxKYPYbvJI4=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:In-Reply-To:References:From; b=L7ANxpnHs3VjgxuY/O7HheUltNZomp2/6Ye/NLrJO7NKdZ9ZQNS5UBdJDDGt4Ch7k Bku9VAiJBYByf1vyw5Nkpnsg+0Y0Fa06B/1dzfQCIV+VnVuYlSy0lDi+8sHUehJdvI rCaoeXObjbBM4ueQnFkiWjY3by4PhOVljmWKX7Sg= Date: Thu, 2 Jun 2022 10:47:03 -0700 From: Andrew Morton To: "Darrick J. Wong" Cc: Shiyang Ruan , Dan Williams , Naoya Horiguchi , Matthew Wilcox , Christoph Hellwig , Dave Chinner , Linux Kernel Mailing List , linux-xfs , Linux NVDIMM , Linux MM , linux-fsdevel , Jane Chu , Goldwyn Rodrigues , Al Viro , linmiaohe@huawei.com Subject: Re: [PATCHSETS] v14 fsdax-rmap + v11 fsdax-reflink Message-Id: <20220602104703.c5af5abde1d9b867d6aed9c7@linux-foundation.org> In-Reply-To: References: <20220511000352.GY27195@magnolia> <20220511014818.GE1098723@dread.disaster.area> <20220510192853.410ea7587f04694038cd01de@linux-foundation.org> <20220511024301.GD27195@magnolia> <20220510222428.0cc8a50bd007474c97b050b2@linux-foundation.org> <20220511151955.GC27212@magnolia> <32f51223-c671-1dc0-e14a-8887863d9071@fujitsu.com> <1007e895-a0e3-9a82-2524-bb7e8a0b6b8c@fujitsu.com> X-Mailer: Sylpheed 3.7.0 (GTK+ 2.24.33; x86_64-redhat-linux-gnu) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Rspam-User: X-Rspamd-Server: rspam02 X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: AB7F5140059 X-Stat-Signature: 7ofn4iix9tr8bk8hfb9qnabuqzdfopf7 Authentication-Results: imf26.hostedemail.com; dkim=pass header.d=linux-foundation.org header.s=korg header.b=L7ANxpnH; dmarc=none; spf=pass (imf26.hostedemail.com: domain of akpm@linux-foundation.org designates 145.40.68.75 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=akpm@linux-foundation.org X-HE-Tag: 1654192023-993457 X-Bogosity: Ham, tests=bogofilter, spamicity=0.000000, version=1.2.4 Sender: owner-linux-mm@kvack.org Precedence: bulk X-Loop: owner-majordomo@kvack.org List-ID: On Thu, 2 Jun 2022 10:18:09 -0700 "Darrick J. Wong" wrote: > On Thu, Jun 02, 2022 at 05:42:13PM +0800, Shiyang Ruan wrote: > > Hi, > > > > Is there any other work I should do with these two patchsets? I think they > > are good for now. So... since the 5.19-rc1 is coming, could the > > notify_failure() part be merged as your plan? > > Hmm. I don't see any of the patches 1-5,7-13 in current upstream, so > I'm guessing this means Andrew isn't taking it for 5.19? Sorry, the volume of commentary led me to believe that it wasn't considered finalized. Shall take a look now.