From: Miaohe Lin <linmiaohe@huawei.com>
To: <akpm@linux-foundation.org>, <naoya.horiguchi@nec.com>
Cc: <peterx@redhat.com>, <apopple@nvidia.com>, <ying.huang@intel.com>,
<osalvador@suse.de>, <mike.kravetz@oracle.com>,
<songmuchun@bytedance.com>, <hch@lst.de>, <dhowells@redhat.com>,
<cl@linux.com>, <linux-mm@kvack.org>,
<linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>, <linmiaohe@huawei.com>
Subject: [PATCH v4 1/4] mm: reduce the rcu lock duration
Date: Mon, 30 May 2022 19:30:13 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20220530113016.16663-2-linmiaohe@huawei.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20220530113016.16663-1-linmiaohe@huawei.com>
Commit 3268c63eded4 ("mm: fix move/migrate_pages() race on task struct")
extends the period of the rcu_read_lock until after the permissions checks
are done to prevent the task pointed to from changing from under us. But
the task_struct refcount is also taken at that time, the reference to task
is guaranteed to be stable. So it's unnecessary to extend the period of
the rcu_read_lock. Release the rcu lock after task refcount is successfully
grabbed to reduce the rcu holding time.
Reviewed-by: Muchun Song <songmuchun@bytedance.com>
Reviewed-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
Reviewed-by: Oscar Salvador <osalvador@suse.de>
Signed-off-by: Miaohe Lin <linmiaohe@huawei.com>
Cc: Huang Ying <ying.huang@intel.com>
Cc: David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com>
Cc: Christoph Lameter <cl@linux.com>
---
mm/mempolicy.c | 3 +--
mm/migrate.c | 3 +--
2 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
diff --git a/mm/mempolicy.c b/mm/mempolicy.c
index 0b4ba3ee810e..2dad094177bf 100644
--- a/mm/mempolicy.c
+++ b/mm/mempolicy.c
@@ -1609,6 +1609,7 @@ static int kernel_migrate_pages(pid_t pid, unsigned long maxnode,
goto out;
}
get_task_struct(task);
+ rcu_read_unlock();
err = -EINVAL;
@@ -1617,11 +1618,9 @@ static int kernel_migrate_pages(pid_t pid, unsigned long maxnode,
* Use the regular "ptrace_may_access()" checks.
*/
if (!ptrace_may_access(task, PTRACE_MODE_READ_REALCREDS)) {
- rcu_read_unlock();
err = -EPERM;
goto out_put;
}
- rcu_read_unlock();
task_nodes = cpuset_mems_allowed(task);
/* Is the user allowed to access the target nodes? */
diff --git a/mm/migrate.c b/mm/migrate.c
index e51588e95f57..e88ebb88fa6f 100644
--- a/mm/migrate.c
+++ b/mm/migrate.c
@@ -1902,17 +1902,16 @@ static struct mm_struct *find_mm_struct(pid_t pid, nodemask_t *mem_nodes)
return ERR_PTR(-ESRCH);
}
get_task_struct(task);
+ rcu_read_unlock();
/*
* Check if this process has the right to modify the specified
* process. Use the regular "ptrace_may_access()" checks.
*/
if (!ptrace_may_access(task, PTRACE_MODE_READ_REALCREDS)) {
- rcu_read_unlock();
mm = ERR_PTR(-EPERM);
goto out;
}
- rcu_read_unlock();
mm = ERR_PTR(security_task_movememory(task));
if (IS_ERR(mm))
--
2.23.0
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2022-05-30 11:30 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 20+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2022-05-30 11:30 [PATCH v4 0/4] A few cleanup and fixup patches for migration Miaohe Lin
2022-05-30 11:30 ` Miaohe Lin [this message]
2022-05-31 6:06 ` [PATCH v4 1/4] mm: reduce the rcu lock duration Ying Huang
2022-05-31 9:01 ` Miaohe Lin
2022-05-31 16:09 ` Eric W. Biederman
2022-06-01 6:33 ` Miaohe Lin
2022-06-01 14:37 ` Eric W. Biederman
2022-06-02 9:22 ` Miaohe Lin
2022-06-03 16:28 ` Eric W. Biederman
2022-06-07 9:19 ` Miaohe Lin
2022-06-18 0:23 ` Andrew Morton
2022-06-18 2:49 ` Miaohe Lin
2022-05-31 12:50 ` David Hildenbrand
2022-05-31 12:58 ` Matthew Wilcox
2022-05-31 13:05 ` Matthew Wilcox
2022-06-01 3:21 ` Miaohe Lin
2022-05-30 11:30 ` [PATCH v4 2/4] mm/migration: remove unneeded lock page and PageMovable check Miaohe Lin
2022-05-31 12:50 ` David Hildenbrand
2022-05-30 11:30 ` [PATCH v4 3/4] mm/migration: return errno when isolate_huge_page failed Miaohe Lin
2022-05-30 11:30 ` [PATCH v4 4/4] mm/migration: fix potential pte_unmap on an not mapped pte Miaohe Lin
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20220530113016.16663-2-linmiaohe@huawei.com \
--to=linmiaohe@huawei.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=apopple@nvidia.com \
--cc=cl@linux.com \
--cc=dhowells@redhat.com \
--cc=hch@lst.de \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=mike.kravetz@oracle.com \
--cc=naoya.horiguchi@nec.com \
--cc=osalvador@suse.de \
--cc=peterx@redhat.com \
--cc=songmuchun@bytedance.com \
--cc=ying.huang@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox