From: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
To: Chen Lin <chen45464546@163.com>
Cc: linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
Alexander Duyck <alexander.h.duyck@linux.intel.com>,
netdev@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] mm: page_frag: Warn_on when frag_alloc size is bigger than PAGE_SIZE
Date: Sun, 29 May 2022 16:30:29 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20220529163029.12425c1e5286d7c7e3fe3708@linux-foundation.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1653752373-3172-1-git-send-email-chen45464546@163.com>
On Sat, 28 May 2022 23:39:33 +0800 Chen Lin <chen45464546@163.com> wrote:
> netdev_alloc_frag->page_frag_alloc may cause memory corruption in
> the following process:
>
> 1. A netdev_alloc_frag function call need alloc 200 Bytes to build a skb.
>
> 2. Insufficient memory to alloc PAGE_FRAG_CACHE_MAX_ORDER(32K) in
> __page_frag_cache_refill to fill frag cache, then one page(eg:4K)
> is allocated, now current frag cache is 4K, alloc is success,
> nc->pagecnt_bias--.
>
> 3. Then this 200 bytes skb in step 1 is freed, page->_refcount--.
>
> 4. Another netdev_alloc_frag function call need alloc 5k, page->_refcount
> is equal to nc->pagecnt_bias, reset page count bias and offset to
> start of new frag. page_frag_alloc will return the 4K memory for a
> 5K memory request.
>
> 5. The caller write on the extra 1k memory which is not actual allocated
> will cause memory corruption.
>
> page_frag_alloc is for fragmented allocation. We should warn the caller
> to avoid memory corruption.
>
Let's cc Alexander and the networking developers.
> --- a/mm/page_alloc.c
> +++ b/mm/page_alloc.c
> @@ -5574,6 +5574,11 @@ void *page_frag_alloc_align(struct page_frag_cache *nc,
> struct page *page;
> int offset;
>
> + /* frag_alloc is not suitable for memory alloc which fragsz
> + * is bigger than PAGE_SIZE, use kmalloc or alloc_pages instead.
> + */
> + WARN_ON(fragsz > PAGE_SIZE);
> +
> if (unlikely(!nc->va)) {
> refill:
> page = __page_frag_cache_refill(nc, gfp_mask);
Odd. All this does is generate a warning. If the kernel is corrupting
memory, that's a bug which needs fixing?
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2022-05-29 23:30 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2022-05-28 15:39 Chen Lin
2022-05-29 23:30 ` Andrew Morton [this message]
[not found] ` <1653917942-5982-1-git-send-email-chen45464546@163.com>
2022-05-30 19:27 ` [PATCH v2] " Jakub Kicinski
2022-05-30 19:29 ` Jakub Kicinski
2022-05-31 14:41 ` Chen Lin
2022-05-31 15:14 ` Jakub Kicinski
2022-05-31 15:36 ` Chen Lin
2022-05-31 15:47 ` Jakub Kicinski
2022-05-31 18:28 ` Alexander Duyck
2022-06-01 12:32 ` 愚树
2022-06-01 15:04 ` Alexander Duyck
2022-07-06 15:21 ` Maurizio Lombardi
2022-05-30 20:07 ` Andrew Morton
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20220529163029.12425c1e5286d7c7e3fe3708@linux-foundation.org \
--to=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=alexander.h.duyck@linux.intel.com \
--cc=chen45464546@163.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox