From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from kanga.kvack.org (kanga.kvack.org [205.233.56.17]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 734D7C433EF for ; Wed, 25 May 2022 21:51:00 +0000 (UTC) Received: by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix) id E6B538D0003; Wed, 25 May 2022 17:50:59 -0400 (EDT) Received: by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix, from userid 40) id E1B9E8D0002; Wed, 25 May 2022 17:50:59 -0400 (EDT) X-Delivered-To: int-list-linux-mm@kvack.org Received: by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix, from userid 63042) id CE3FE8D0003; Wed, 25 May 2022 17:50:59 -0400 (EDT) X-Delivered-To: linux-mm@kvack.org Received: from relay.hostedemail.com (smtprelay0016.hostedemail.com [216.40.44.16]) by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C01168D0002 for ; Wed, 25 May 2022 17:50:59 -0400 (EDT) Received: from smtpin02.hostedemail.com (a10.router.float.18 [10.200.18.1]) by unirelay06.hostedemail.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8F98A34E38 for ; Wed, 25 May 2022 21:50:59 +0000 (UTC) X-FDA: 79505611038.02.8D54422 Received: from dfw.source.kernel.org (dfw.source.kernel.org [139.178.84.217]) by imf04.hostedemail.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id CE29840012 for ; Wed, 25 May 2022 21:50:42 +0000 (UTC) Received: from smtp.kernel.org (relay.kernel.org [52.25.139.140]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by dfw.source.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id EA7F761AB6; Wed, 25 May 2022 21:50:57 +0000 (UTC) Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id C68EFC385B8; Wed, 25 May 2022 21:50:56 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=linux-foundation.org; s=korg; t=1653515457; bh=RJBqCEbCNY0ooTTHUDW8T5ccFZ9a+R65ZzhmVt+2S44=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:In-Reply-To:References:From; b=R8xzes5UjWb8BqqxzRNWgPf7cEHyaAbeSDj+v3F0k3sq8Asguyz6Vmo/uMlX6uzmY 8HryaeniW2c258rIiLOGG2MjKsnv6NbBuzhNNsrGT4ET41NSmI5sqMNPKOc8It7ZVv QGSPkTQx3i5p9WrHix2LggCVXiwA2BU9p5l/o92c= Date: Wed, 25 May 2022 14:50:56 -0700 From: Andrew Morton To: kernel test robot Cc: virtualization@lists.linux-foundation.org, netdev@vger.kernel.org, linux-staging@lists.linux.dev, linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org, linux-rdma@vger.kernel.org, linux-pci@vger.kernel.org, linux-parport@lists.infradead.org, linux-omap@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-fbdev@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, kvm@vger.kernel.org, dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org, bpf@vger.kernel.org, amd-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org, alsa-devel@alsa-project.org Subject: Re: [linux-next:master] BUILD REGRESSION 8cb8311e95e3bb58bd84d6350365f14a718faa6d Message-Id: <20220525145056.953631743a4c494aabf000dc@linux-foundation.org> In-Reply-To: <628ea118.wJYf60YnZco0hs9o%lkp@intel.com> References: <628ea118.wJYf60YnZco0hs9o%lkp@intel.com> X-Mailer: Sylpheed 3.7.0 (GTK+ 2.24.33; x86_64-redhat-linux-gnu) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Rspamd-Server: rspam10 X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: CE29840012 X-Stat-Signature: qpjor5ozwb4tpfpqfruwgfqss1wqceas X-Rspam-User: Authentication-Results: imf04.hostedemail.com; dkim=pass header.d=linux-foundation.org header.s=korg header.b=R8xzes5U; spf=pass (imf04.hostedemail.com: domain of akpm@linux-foundation.org designates 139.178.84.217 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=akpm@linux-foundation.org; dmarc=none X-HE-Tag: 1653515442-48464 X-Bogosity: Ham, tests=bogofilter, spamicity=0.000000, version=1.2.4 Sender: owner-linux-mm@kvack.org Precedence: bulk X-Loop: owner-majordomo@kvack.org List-ID: On Thu, 26 May 2022 05:35:20 +0800 kernel test robot wrote: > tree/branch: https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/next/linux-next.git master > branch HEAD: 8cb8311e95e3bb58bd84d6350365f14a718faa6d Add linux-next specific files for 20220525 > > Error/Warning reports: > > ... > > Unverified Error/Warning (likely false positive, please contact us if interested): Could be so. > mm/shmem.c:1948 shmem_getpage_gfp() warn: should '(((1) << 12) / 512) << folio_order(folio)' be a 64 bit type? I've been seeing this one for a while. And from this report I can't figure out what tool emitted it. Clang? > > ... > > |-- i386-randconfig-m021 > | `-- mm-shmem.c-shmem_getpage_gfp()-warn:should-((()-)-)-folio_order(folio)-be-a-bit-type If you're going to use randconfig then shouldn't you make the config available? Or maybe quote the KCONFIG_SEED - presumably there's a way for others to regenerate. Anyway, the warning seems wrong to me. #define PAGE_SIZE (_AC(1,UL) << PAGE_SHIFT) #define BLOCKS_PER_PAGE (PAGE_SIZE/512) inode->i_blocks += BLOCKS_PER_PAGE << folio_order(folio); so the RHS here should have unsigned long type. Being able to generate the cpp output would be helpful. That requires the .config.