linux-mm.kvack.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Miaohe Lin <linmiaohe@huawei.com>
To: <akpm@linux-foundation.org>, <mike.kravetz@oracle.com>,
	<naoya.horiguchi@nec.com>
Cc: <peterx@redhat.com>, <apopple@nvidia.com>, <ying.huang@intel.com>,
	<david@redhat.com>, <songmuchun@bytedance.com>, <hch@lst.de>,
	<dhowells@redhat.com>, <cl@linux.com>, <linux-mm@kvack.org>,
	<linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>, <linmiaohe@huawei.com>
Subject: [PATCH v3 1/4] mm: reduce the rcu lock duration
Date: Wed, 25 May 2022 16:18:19 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20220525081822.53547-2-linmiaohe@huawei.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20220525081822.53547-1-linmiaohe@huawei.com>

Commit 3268c63eded4 ("mm: fix move/migrate_pages() race on task struct")
extends the period of the rcu_read_lock until after the permissions checks
are done to prevent the task pointed to from changing from under us. But
the task_struct refcount is also taken at that time, the reference to task
is guaranteed to be stable. So it's unnecessary to extend the period of
the rcu_read_lock. Release the rcu lock after task refcount is successfully
grabbed to reduce the rcu holding time.

Reviewed-by: Muchun Song <songmuchun@bytedance.com>
Reviewed-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
Signed-off-by: Miaohe Lin <linmiaohe@huawei.com>
Cc: Huang Ying <ying.huang@intel.com>
Cc: David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com>
Cc: Christoph Lameter <cl@linux.com>
---
 mm/mempolicy.c | 3 +--
 mm/migrate.c   | 3 +--
 2 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)

diff --git a/mm/mempolicy.c b/mm/mempolicy.c
index 0b4ba3ee810e..2dad094177bf 100644
--- a/mm/mempolicy.c
+++ b/mm/mempolicy.c
@@ -1609,6 +1609,7 @@ static int kernel_migrate_pages(pid_t pid, unsigned long maxnode,
 		goto out;
 	}
 	get_task_struct(task);
+	rcu_read_unlock();
 
 	err = -EINVAL;
 
@@ -1617,11 +1618,9 @@ static int kernel_migrate_pages(pid_t pid, unsigned long maxnode,
 	 * Use the regular "ptrace_may_access()" checks.
 	 */
 	if (!ptrace_may_access(task, PTRACE_MODE_READ_REALCREDS)) {
-		rcu_read_unlock();
 		err = -EPERM;
 		goto out_put;
 	}
-	rcu_read_unlock();
 
 	task_nodes = cpuset_mems_allowed(task);
 	/* Is the user allowed to access the target nodes? */
diff --git a/mm/migrate.c b/mm/migrate.c
index e51588e95f57..e88ebb88fa6f 100644
--- a/mm/migrate.c
+++ b/mm/migrate.c
@@ -1902,17 +1902,16 @@ static struct mm_struct *find_mm_struct(pid_t pid, nodemask_t *mem_nodes)
 		return ERR_PTR(-ESRCH);
 	}
 	get_task_struct(task);
+	rcu_read_unlock();
 
 	/*
 	 * Check if this process has the right to modify the specified
 	 * process. Use the regular "ptrace_may_access()" checks.
 	 */
 	if (!ptrace_may_access(task, PTRACE_MODE_READ_REALCREDS)) {
-		rcu_read_unlock();
 		mm = ERR_PTR(-EPERM);
 		goto out;
 	}
-	rcu_read_unlock();
 
 	mm = ERR_PTR(security_task_movememory(task));
 	if (IS_ERR(mm))
-- 
2.23.0



  reply	other threads:[~2022-05-25  8:18 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2022-05-25  8:18 [PATCH v3 0/4] A few cleanup and fixup patches for migration Miaohe Lin
2022-05-25  8:18 ` Miaohe Lin [this message]
2022-05-25  8:32   ` [PATCH v3 1/4] mm: reduce the rcu lock duration Oscar Salvador
2022-05-25  8:18 ` [PATCH v3 2/4] mm/migration: remove unneeded lock page and PageMovable check Miaohe Lin
2022-05-25  8:33   ` Oscar Salvador
2022-05-25  8:18 ` [PATCH v3 3/4] mm/migration: return errno when isolate_huge_page failed Miaohe Lin
2022-05-25  8:41   ` Oscar Salvador
2022-05-26  1:53     ` Miaohe Lin
2022-05-25  8:18 ` [PATCH v3 4/4] mm/migration: fix potential pte_unmap on an not mapped pte Miaohe Lin

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20220525081822.53547-2-linmiaohe@huawei.com \
    --to=linmiaohe@huawei.com \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=apopple@nvidia.com \
    --cc=cl@linux.com \
    --cc=david@redhat.com \
    --cc=dhowells@redhat.com \
    --cc=hch@lst.de \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
    --cc=mike.kravetz@oracle.com \
    --cc=naoya.horiguchi@nec.com \
    --cc=peterx@redhat.com \
    --cc=songmuchun@bytedance.com \
    --cc=ying.huang@intel.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox