From: Muchun Song <songmuchun@bytedance.com>
To: hannes@cmpxchg.org, mhocko@kernel.org, roman.gushchin@linux.dev,
shakeelb@google.com
Cc: cgroups@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, duanxiongchun@bytedance.com,
longman@redhat.com, Muchun Song <songmuchun@bytedance.com>
Subject: [PATCH v4 06/11] mm: thp: make split queue lock safe when LRU pages are reparented
Date: Tue, 24 May 2022 14:05:46 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20220524060551.80037-7-songmuchun@bytedance.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20220524060551.80037-1-songmuchun@bytedance.com>
Similar to the lruvec lock, we use the same approach to make the split
queue lock safe when LRU pages are reparented.
Signed-off-by: Muchun Song <songmuchun@bytedance.com>
---
mm/huge_memory.c | 23 +++++++++++++++++++++++
1 file changed, 23 insertions(+)
diff --git a/mm/huge_memory.c b/mm/huge_memory.c
index ea152bde441e..cc596034c487 100644
--- a/mm/huge_memory.c
+++ b/mm/huge_memory.c
@@ -543,9 +543,22 @@ static struct deferred_split *folio_split_queue_lock(struct folio *folio)
{
struct deferred_split *queue;
+ rcu_read_lock();
+retry:
queue = folio_split_queue(folio);
spin_lock(&queue->split_queue_lock);
+ if (unlikely(folio_split_queue_memcg(folio, queue) != folio_memcg(folio))) {
+ spin_unlock(&queue->split_queue_lock);
+ goto retry;
+ }
+
+ /*
+ * Preemption is disabled in the internal of spin_lock, which can serve
+ * as RCU read-side critical sections.
+ */
+ rcu_read_unlock();
+
return queue;
}
@@ -554,9 +567,19 @@ folio_split_queue_lock_irqsave(struct folio *folio, unsigned long *flags)
{
struct deferred_split *queue;
+ rcu_read_lock();
+retry:
queue = folio_split_queue(folio);
spin_lock_irqsave(&queue->split_queue_lock, *flags);
+ if (unlikely(folio_split_queue_memcg(folio, queue) != folio_memcg(folio))) {
+ spin_unlock_irqrestore(&queue->split_queue_lock, *flags);
+ goto retry;
+ }
+
+ /* See the comments in folio_split_queue_lock(). */
+ rcu_read_unlock();
+
return queue;
}
--
2.11.0
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2022-05-24 6:27 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 48+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2022-05-24 6:05 [PATCH v4 00/11] Use obj_cgroup APIs to charge the LRU pages Muchun Song
2022-05-24 6:05 ` [PATCH v4 01/11] mm: memcontrol: prepare objcg API for non-kmem usage Muchun Song
2022-05-24 19:01 ` Johannes Weiner
2022-05-25 8:46 ` Muchun Song
2022-05-25 2:36 ` Roman Gushchin
2022-05-25 7:57 ` Muchun Song
2022-05-25 12:37 ` Johannes Weiner
2022-05-25 13:08 ` Muchun Song
2022-05-24 6:05 ` [PATCH v4 02/11] mm: memcontrol: introduce compact_folio_lruvec_lock_irqsave Muchun Song
2022-05-24 19:22 ` Johannes Weiner
2022-05-25 9:38 ` Muchun Song
2022-05-24 6:05 ` [PATCH v4 03/11] mm: memcontrol: make lruvec lock safe when LRU pages are reparented Muchun Song
2022-05-24 19:23 ` Waiman Long
2022-05-25 10:20 ` Muchun Song
2022-05-25 14:59 ` Waiman Long
2022-05-24 19:27 ` Johannes Weiner
2022-05-25 9:53 ` Muchun Song
2022-05-25 12:30 ` Johannes Weiner
2022-05-25 13:03 ` Muchun Song
2022-05-25 14:48 ` Johannes Weiner
2022-05-25 15:38 ` Muchun Song
2022-05-26 20:17 ` Waiman Long
2022-05-27 2:55 ` Muchun Song
2022-05-24 6:05 ` [PATCH v4 04/11] mm: vmscan: rework move_pages_to_lru() Muchun Song
2022-05-24 19:38 ` Johannes Weiner
2022-05-25 11:38 ` Muchun Song
2022-05-24 19:52 ` Waiman Long
2022-05-25 11:43 ` Muchun Song
2022-05-25 2:43 ` Roman Gushchin
2022-05-25 11:41 ` Muchun Song
2022-05-24 6:05 ` [PATCH v4 05/11] mm: thp: introduce folio_split_queue_lock{_irqsave}() Muchun Song
2022-05-24 6:05 ` Muchun Song [this message]
2022-05-25 2:54 ` [PATCH v4 06/11] mm: thp: make split queue lock safe when LRU pages are reparented Roman Gushchin
2022-05-25 11:44 ` Muchun Song
2022-05-24 6:05 ` [PATCH v4 07/11] mm: memcontrol: make all the callers of {folio,page}_memcg() safe Muchun Song
2022-05-25 3:03 ` Roman Gushchin
2022-05-25 11:51 ` Muchun Song
2022-05-24 6:05 ` [PATCH v4 08/11] mm: memcontrol: introduce memcg_reparent_ops Muchun Song
2022-05-24 6:05 ` [PATCH v4 09/11] mm: memcontrol: use obj_cgroup APIs to charge the LRU pages Muchun Song
2022-05-24 12:29 ` kernel test robot
2022-05-24 18:16 ` kernel test robot
2022-05-25 7:14 ` [mm] bec0ae1210: WARNING:possible_recursive_locking_detected kernel test robot
2022-05-24 6:05 ` [PATCH v4 10/11] mm: lru: add VM_BUG_ON_FOLIO to lru maintenance function Muchun Song
2022-05-24 19:44 ` Johannes Weiner
2022-05-25 11:59 ` Muchun Song
2022-05-25 2:40 ` Roman Gushchin
2022-05-25 11:58 ` Muchun Song
2022-05-24 6:05 ` [PATCH v4 11/11] mm: lru: use lruvec lock to serialize memcg changes Muchun Song
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20220524060551.80037-7-songmuchun@bytedance.com \
--to=songmuchun@bytedance.com \
--cc=cgroups@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=duanxiongchun@bytedance.com \
--cc=hannes@cmpxchg.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=longman@redhat.com \
--cc=mhocko@kernel.org \
--cc=roman.gushchin@linux.dev \
--cc=shakeelb@google.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox