From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from kanga.kvack.org (kanga.kvack.org [205.233.56.17]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DDBDEC433EF for ; Wed, 18 May 2022 16:19:14 +0000 (UTC) Received: by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix) id 0FF9A6B0073; Wed, 18 May 2022 12:19:14 -0400 (EDT) Received: by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix, from userid 40) id 088C06B0074; Wed, 18 May 2022 12:19:14 -0400 (EDT) X-Delivered-To: int-list-linux-mm@kvack.org Received: by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix, from userid 63042) id E6AE96B0075; Wed, 18 May 2022 12:19:13 -0400 (EDT) X-Delivered-To: linux-mm@kvack.org Received: from relay.hostedemail.com (smtprelay0017.hostedemail.com [216.40.44.17]) by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D376D6B0073 for ; Wed, 18 May 2022 12:19:13 -0400 (EDT) Received: from smtpin17.hostedemail.com (a10.router.float.18 [10.200.18.1]) by unirelay08.hostedemail.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id AE1D22086A for ; Wed, 18 May 2022 16:19:13 +0000 (UTC) X-FDA: 79479373386.17.ECF8E21 Received: from smtp-out1.suse.de (smtp-out1.suse.de [195.135.220.28]) by imf26.hostedemail.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id EE1431400D4 for ; Wed, 18 May 2022 16:19:09 +0000 (UTC) Received: from imap2.suse-dmz.suse.de (imap2.suse-dmz.suse.de [192.168.254.74]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature ECDSA (P-521) server-digest SHA512) (No client certificate requested) by smtp-out1.suse.de (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 1523C21B69; Wed, 18 May 2022 16:19:12 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=suse.com; s=susede1; t=1652890752; h=from:from:reply-to:date:date:message-id:message-id:to:to:cc:cc: mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: content-transfer-encoding:content-transfer-encoding; bh=MA/TGEKVPxKbLeu24UuN4Wl1Ug0/+Zeg7Z8sjXvszlQ=; b=T85gBeJqRK7xR4vfqE2zMJJ0HcOS1Oi0LQBMKaORbDWklcTCaU6N0C+f/+G32E1UIaG2pf uN7mFG3ut+AnHRXV4hElSGMXOe4Z3ksjgrCJsuNXmcgZNR7l7Mt3ecWR4ZUOijndkH1n6F pdEZxqpGuYJi3qbHxvEon2tXxQjwnS8= Received: from imap2.suse-dmz.suse.de (imap2.suse-dmz.suse.de [192.168.254.74]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature ECDSA (P-521) server-digest SHA512) (No client certificate requested) by imap2.suse-dmz.suse.de (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D94E313A6D; Wed, 18 May 2022 16:19:11 +0000 (UTC) Received: from dovecot-director2.suse.de ([192.168.254.65]) by imap2.suse-dmz.suse.de with ESMTPSA id PXsQNH8chWLqZAAAMHmgww (envelope-from ); Wed, 18 May 2022 16:19:11 +0000 From: =?UTF-8?q?Michal=20Koutn=C3=BD?= To: cgroups@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org Cc: Johannes Weiner , Michal Hocko , Roman Gushchin , Shakeel Butt , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org, Richard Palethorpe Subject: Date: Wed, 18 May 2022 18:18:54 +0200 Message-Id: <20220518161859.21565-1-mkoutny@suse.com> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.35.3 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Authentication-Results: imf26.hostedemail.com; dkim=pass header.d=suse.com header.s=susede1 header.b=T85gBeJq; dmarc=pass (policy=quarantine) header.from=suse.com; spf=pass (imf26.hostedemail.com: domain of mkoutny@suse.com designates 195.135.220.28 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=mkoutny@suse.com X-Rspamd-Server: rspam06 X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: EE1431400D4 X-Rspam-User: X-Stat-Signature: mebtb3rxo5ak5f6g6s3pqmjn7deutdpc X-HE-Tag: 1652890749-361547 X-Bogosity: Ham, tests=bogofilter, spamicity=0.000000, version=1.2.4 Sender: owner-linux-mm@kvack.org Precedence: bulk X-Loop: owner-majordomo@kvack.org List-ID: Subject: [PATCH v2 0/5] memcontrol selftests fixups Hello. I'm just flushing the patches to make memcontrol selftests check the events behavior we had consensus about (test_memcg_low fails). (test_memcg_reclaim, test_memcg_swap_max fail for me now but it's present even before the refactoring.) The two bigger changes are: - adjustment of the protected values to make tests succeed with the given tolerance, - both test_memcg_low and test_memcg_min check protection of memory in populated cgroups (actually as per Documentation/admin-guide/cgroup-v2.rst memory.min should not apply to empty cgroups, which is not the case currently. Therefore I unified tests with the populated case in order to to bring more broken tests). Thanks, Michal Changes from v1 (https://lore.kernel.org/r/20220513171811.730-1-mkoutny@suse.com/) - fixed mis-rebase in compilation fix patch, - added review, ack tags from v1, - applied feedback from v1 (Octave script in git tree), - added one more patch extracting common parts, - rebased on mm-stable bbe832b9db2e. Michal Koutný (5): selftests: memcg: Fix compilation selftests: memcg: Expect no low events in unprotected sibling selftests: memcg: Adjust expected reclaim values of protected cgroups selftests: memcg: Remove protection from top level memcg selftests: memcg: Factor out common parts of memory.{low,min} tests MAINTAINERS | 1 + .../selftests/cgroup/memcg_protection.m | 89 +++++++ .../selftests/cgroup/test_memcontrol.c | 247 +++++------------- 3 files changed, 152 insertions(+), 185 deletions(-) create mode 100644 tools/testing/selftests/cgroup/memcg_protection.m -- 2.35.3