From: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>
To: Vasily Averin <vvs@openvz.org>
Cc: kernel test robot <lkp@intel.com>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>,
kbuild-all@lists.01.org, Shakeel Butt <shakeelb@google.com>,
kernel@openvz.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
Roman Gushchin <roman.gushchin@linux.dev>,
Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@suse.cz>, Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.com>,
cgroups@vger.kernel.org,
Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
Linux Memory Management List <linux-mm@kvack.org>,
Dennis Zhou <dennis@kernel.org>, Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>,
Christoph Lameter <cl@linux-foundation.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] percpu: improve percpu_alloc_percpu event trace
Date: Mon, 9 May 2022 17:06:05 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20220509170605.2eb7637e@gandalf.local.home> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <e1c09bbb-2c58-a986-c704-1db538da905a@openvz.org>
On Sat, 7 May 2022 17:51:16 +0300
Vasily Averin <vvs@openvz.org> wrote:
> The same messages are generated for any other gfp_t argument in trace events.
> As far as I understand it is not a bug per se,
> but trace macros lacks __force attribute in 'gfp_t'-> 'unsigned long' casts.
> The same thing happens with mode_t and with some other places using __print_flags()
> for __bitwise marked types.
I'm curious as to where the gfp_t to unsigned long is happening in the
macros?
-- Steve
prev parent reply other threads:[~2022-05-09 21:06 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <8d627f02-183f-c4e7-7c15-77b2b438536b@openvz.org>
2022-05-06 20:38 ` kernel test robot
[not found] ` <e1c09bbb-2c58-a986-c704-1db538da905a@openvz.org>
[not found] ` <331d88fe-f4f7-657c-02a2-d977f15fbff6@openvz.org>
2022-05-07 19:37 ` [PATCH mm] tracing: incorrect gfp_t conversion Andrew Morton
[not found] ` <8b1cfefa-da7d-3376-cf04-1ff77dab8170@openvz.org>
2022-05-07 22:48 ` Andrew Morton
2022-05-07 23:00 ` Andrew Morton
2022-05-08 20:37 ` Matthew Wilcox
2022-05-08 20:51 ` Joe Perches
[not found] ` <8b9ba8ce-7376-2ef2-95f5-30e53cb46914@openvz.org>
2022-05-15 22:09 ` [PATCH mm v2] " Steven Rostedt
2022-05-16 20:55 ` Andrew Morton
2022-05-09 21:06 ` Steven Rostedt [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20220509170605.2eb7637e@gandalf.local.home \
--to=rostedt@goodmis.org \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=cgroups@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=cl@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=dennis@kernel.org \
--cc=kbuild-all@lists.01.org \
--cc=kernel@openvz.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=lkp@intel.com \
--cc=mhocko@suse.com \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=roman.gushchin@linux.dev \
--cc=shakeelb@google.com \
--cc=tj@kernel.org \
--cc=vbabka@suse.cz \
--cc=vvs@openvz.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox