From: "Kirill A. Shutemov" <kirill@shutemov.name>
To: Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de>
Cc: "Kirill A. Shutemov" <kirill.shutemov@linux.intel.com>,
Andy Lutomirski <luto@kernel.org>,
Sean Christopherson <seanjc@google.com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
Joerg Roedel <jroedel@suse.de>, Ard Biesheuvel <ardb@kernel.org>,
Andi Kleen <ak@linux.intel.com>,
Kuppuswamy Sathyanarayanan
<sathyanarayanan.kuppuswamy@linux.intel.com>,
David Rientjes <rientjes@google.com>,
Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@suse.cz>,
Tom Lendacky <thomas.lendacky@amd.com>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>,
Varad Gautam <varad.gautam@suse.com>,
Dario Faggioli <dfaggioli@suse.com>,
Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@intel.com>,
Brijesh Singh <brijesh.singh@amd.com>,
Mike Rapoport <rppt@kernel.org>,
David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com>,
x86@kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-coco@lists.linux.dev,
linux-efi@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCHv5 03/12] efi/x86: Get full memory map in allocate_e820()
Date: Thu, 28 Apr 2022 02:48:53 +0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20220427234853.6kt67gjrwzrhgvoa@box.shutemov.name> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <YmmmpxVDyc3R5K2t@zn.tnic>
On Wed, Apr 27, 2022 at 10:25:11PM +0200, Borislav Petkov wrote:
> On Mon, Apr 25, 2022 at 06:39:25AM +0300, Kirill A. Shutemov wrote:
> > static efi_status_t allocate_e820(struct boot_params *params,
> > + struct efi_boot_memmap *map,
> > struct setup_data **e820ext,
> > u32 *e820ext_size)
> > {
> > - unsigned long map_size, desc_size, map_key;
> > efi_status_t status;
> > - __u32 nr_desc, desc_version;
> > + __u32 nr_desc;
> >
> > - /* Only need the size of the mem map and size of each mem descriptor */
> > - map_size = 0;
> > - status = efi_bs_call(get_memory_map, &map_size, NULL, &map_key,
> > - &desc_size, &desc_version);
> > - if (status != EFI_BUFFER_TOO_SMALL)
> > - return (status != EFI_SUCCESS) ? status : EFI_UNSUPPORTED;
> > -
> > - nr_desc = map_size / desc_size + EFI_MMAP_NR_SLACK_SLOTS;
> > + status = efi_get_memory_map(map);
> > + if (status != EFI_SUCCESS)
> > + return status;
> >
> > - if (nr_desc > ARRAY_SIZE(params->e820_table)) {
> > - u32 nr_e820ext = nr_desc - ARRAY_SIZE(params->e820_table);
> > + nr_desc = *map->map_size / *map->desc_size;
> > + if (nr_desc > ARRAY_SIZE(params->e820_table) - EFI_MMAP_NR_SLACK_SLOTS) {
> > + u32 nr_e820ext = nr_desc - ARRAY_SIZE(params->e820_table) +
> > + EFI_MMAP_NR_SLACK_SLOTS;
> >
> > status = alloc_e820ext(nr_e820ext, e820ext, e820ext_size);
> > if (status != EFI_SUCCESS)
> > - return status;
> > + goto out;
>
> Still silly, that label is useless then. Pasting the whole, simplified
> function below.
>
> It looks like it all boils down to propagating the retval up the chain...
Right. That's true. But having goto here makes patch 5/12 a bit cleaner.
I will move the goto there. Is that what you want to see?
--
Kirill A. Shutemov
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2022-04-27 23:47 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 56+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2022-04-25 3:39 [PATCHv5 00/12] mm, x86/cc: Implement support for unaccepted memory Kirill A. Shutemov
2022-04-25 3:39 ` [PATCHv5 01/12] x86/boot/: Centralize __pa()/__va() definitions Kirill A. Shutemov
2022-04-25 7:37 ` David Hildenbrand
2022-04-25 7:52 ` Mike Rapoport
2022-04-25 3:39 ` [PATCHv5 02/12] mm: Add support for unaccepted memory Kirill A. Shutemov
2022-04-28 10:05 ` Borislav Petkov
2022-05-03 20:21 ` David Hildenbrand
2022-05-06 0:54 ` Kirill A. Shutemov
2022-04-25 3:39 ` [PATCHv5 03/12] efi/x86: Get full memory map in allocate_e820() Kirill A. Shutemov
[not found] ` <YmmmpxVDyc3R5K2t@zn.tnic>
2022-04-27 23:48 ` Kirill A. Shutemov [this message]
2022-04-25 3:39 ` [PATCHv5 04/12] x86/boot: Add infrastructure required for unaccepted memory support Kirill A. Shutemov
2022-04-29 10:58 ` Wander Lairson Costa
2022-05-02 13:38 ` Kirill A. Shutemov
2022-04-25 3:39 ` [PATCHv5 05/12] efi/x86: Implement support for unaccepted memory Kirill A. Shutemov
2022-04-29 10:53 ` Borislav Petkov
2022-05-02 13:40 ` Kirill A. Shutemov
2022-04-25 3:39 ` [PATCHv5 06/12] x86/boot/compressed: Handle " Kirill A. Shutemov
2022-04-27 0:17 ` Michael Roth
2022-04-27 14:19 ` Kirill A. Shutemov
2022-05-03 14:15 ` Borislav Petkov
2022-04-29 13:10 ` Wander Lairson Costa
2022-05-03 14:12 ` Borislav Petkov
2022-05-06 15:30 ` Kirill A. Shutemov
2022-05-10 11:03 ` Borislav Petkov
2022-05-13 5:31 ` Dionna Amalie Glaze
2022-05-13 5:34 ` Dionna Amalie Glaze
2022-05-13 9:01 ` Borislav Petkov
2022-05-13 14:45 ` Kirill A. Shutemov
2022-05-16 6:46 ` Xu, Min M
2022-05-31 22:37 ` Dionna Amalie Glaze
2022-05-31 22:40 ` Dionna Amalie Glaze
2022-06-01 15:49 ` Gupta, Pankaj
2022-06-01 16:20 ` Dionna Amalie Glaze
2022-06-01 19:34 ` Randy Dunlap
2022-06-01 21:19 ` Gupta, Pankaj
2022-06-02 12:51 ` Gupta, Pankaj
2022-06-02 15:31 ` Dionna Amalie Glaze
2022-06-07 17:28 ` Dionna Amalie Glaze
2022-06-07 18:15 ` Gupta, Pankaj
2022-04-25 3:39 ` [PATCHv5 07/12] x86/mm: Reserve unaccepted memory bitmap Kirill A. Shutemov
2022-04-29 13:19 ` Wander Lairson Costa
2022-05-04 11:04 ` Borislav Petkov
2022-04-25 3:39 ` [PATCHv5 08/12] x86/mm: Provide helpers for unaccepted memory Kirill A. Shutemov
2022-05-04 11:12 ` Borislav Petkov
2022-05-06 16:13 ` Kirill A. Shutemov
2022-05-10 18:32 ` Borislav Petkov
2022-05-11 1:15 ` Kirill A. Shutemov
2022-05-11 9:07 ` Borislav Petkov
2022-04-25 3:39 ` [PATCHv5 09/12] x86/tdx: Make _tdx_hypercall() and __tdx_module_call() available in boot stub Kirill A. Shutemov
2022-04-25 3:39 ` [PATCHv5 10/12] x86/tdx: Unaccepted memory support Kirill A. Shutemov
2022-05-05 10:12 ` Borislav Petkov
2022-05-06 20:44 ` Kirill A. Shutemov
2022-05-11 1:19 ` Kirill A. Shutemov
2022-05-11 9:13 ` Borislav Petkov
2022-04-25 3:39 ` [PATCHv5 11/12] mm/vmstat: Add counter for memory accepting Kirill A. Shutemov
2022-04-25 3:39 ` [PATCHv5 12/12] x86/mm: Report unaccepted memory in /proc/meminfo Kirill A. Shutemov
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20220427234853.6kt67gjrwzrhgvoa@box.shutemov.name \
--to=kirill@shutemov.name \
--cc=ak@linux.intel.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=ardb@kernel.org \
--cc=bp@alien8.de \
--cc=brijesh.singh@amd.com \
--cc=dave.hansen@intel.com \
--cc=david@redhat.com \
--cc=dfaggioli@suse.com \
--cc=jroedel@suse.de \
--cc=kirill.shutemov@linux.intel.com \
--cc=linux-coco@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=linux-efi@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=luto@kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=rientjes@google.com \
--cc=rppt@kernel.org \
--cc=sathyanarayanan.kuppuswamy@linux.intel.com \
--cc=seanjc@google.com \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=thomas.lendacky@amd.com \
--cc=varad.gautam@suse.com \
--cc=vbabka@suse.cz \
--cc=x86@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox