From: Martin Fernandez <martin.fernandez@eclypsium.com>
To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-efi@vger.kernel.org,
platform-driver-x86@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org
Cc: tglx@linutronix.de, mingo@redhat.com, bp@alien8.de,
dave.hansen@linux.intel.com, x86@kernel.org, hpa@zytor.com,
ardb@kernel.org, dvhart@infradead.org, andy@infradead.org,
gregkh@linuxfoundation.org, rafael@kernel.org, rppt@kernel.org,
akpm@linux-foundation.org, daniel.gutson@eclypsium.com,
hughsient@gmail.com, alex.bazhaniuk@eclypsium.com,
alison.schofield@intel.com, keescook@chromium.org,
Martin Fernandez <martin.fernandez@eclypsium.com>
Subject: [PATCH v7 5/8] x86/e820: Refactor e820__range_remove
Date: Mon, 25 Apr 2022 14:15:23 -0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20220425171526.44925-6-martin.fernandez@eclypsium.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20220425171526.44925-1-martin.fernandez@eclypsium.com>
Refactor e820__range_remove with the introduction of
e820_remover_data, indented to be used as the void pointer in the
e820_entry_updater callbacks, and the implementation of the callbacks
remove a range in the e820_table.
Signed-off-by: Martin Fernandez <martin.fernandez@eclypsium.com>
---
arch/x86/kernel/e820.c | 112 ++++++++++++++++++++++-------------------
1 file changed, 60 insertions(+), 52 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/e820.c b/arch/x86/kernel/e820.c
index 763b8b20a1fd..9e32c9819e99 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kernel/e820.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kernel/e820.c
@@ -717,66 +717,74 @@ static u64 __init e820__range_update_kexec(u64 start, u64 size,
return __e820__range_update(e820_table_kexec, start, size, old_type, new_type);
}
-/* Remove a range of memory from the E820 table: */
-u64 __init e820__range_remove(u64 start, u64 size, enum e820_type old_type, bool check_type)
-{
- int i;
- u64 end;
- u64 real_removed_size = 0;
-
- if (size > (ULLONG_MAX - start))
- size = ULLONG_MAX - start;
-
- end = start + size;
- printk(KERN_DEBUG "e820: remove [mem %#010Lx-%#010Lx] ", start, end - 1);
- if (check_type)
- e820_print_type(old_type);
- pr_cont("\n");
-
- for (i = 0; i < e820_table->nr_entries; i++) {
- struct e820_entry *entry = &e820_table->entries[i];
- u64 final_start, final_end;
- u64 entry_end;
+/**
+ * struct e820_remover_data - Helper type for e820__range_remove().
+ * @old_type: old_type parameter of e820__range_remove().
+ * @check_type: check_type parameter of e820__range_remove().
+ *
+ * This is intended to be used as the @data argument for the
+ * e820_entry_updater callbacks.
+ */
+struct e820_remover_data {
+ enum e820_type old_type;
+ bool check_type;
+};
- if (check_type && entry->type != old_type)
- continue;
+static bool __init remover__should_update(const struct e820_entry *entry,
+ const void *data)
+{
+ const struct e820_remover_data *remover_data =
+ (const struct e820_remover_data *)data;
- entry_end = entry->addr + entry->size;
+ return !remover_data->check_type ||
+ entry->type == remover_data->old_type;
+}
- /* Completely covered? */
- if (entry->addr >= start && entry_end <= end) {
- real_removed_size += entry->size;
- memset(entry, 0, sizeof(*entry));
- continue;
- }
+static void __init remover__update(struct e820_entry *entry, const void *data)
+{
+ memset(entry, 0, sizeof(*entry));
+}
- /* Is the new range completely covered? */
- if (entry->addr < start && entry_end > end) {
- e820__range_add(end, entry_end - end, entry->type);
- entry->size = start - entry->addr;
- real_removed_size += size;
- continue;
- }
+static void __init remover__new(struct e820_table *table, u64 new_start,
+ u64 new_size, const struct e820_entry *original,
+ const void *data)
+{
+}
- /* Partially covered: */
- final_start = max(start, entry->addr);
- final_end = min(end, entry_end);
- if (final_start >= final_end)
- continue;
+/**
+ * e820__range_remove() - Remove an address range from e820_table.
+ * @start: Start of the address range.
+ * @size: Size of the address range.
+ * @old_type: Type of the entries that we want to remove.
+ * @check_type: Bool to decide if ignore @old_type or not.
+ *
+ * Remove [@start, @start + @size) from e820_table. If @check_type is
+ * true remove only entries with type @old_type.
+ *
+ * Return: The size removed.
+ */
+u64 __init e820__range_remove(u64 start, u64 size, enum e820_type old_type,
+ bool check_type)
+{
+ struct e820_entry_updater updater = {
+ .should_update = remover__should_update,
+ .update = remover__update,
+ .new = remover__new
+ };
- real_removed_size += final_end - final_start;
+ struct e820_remover_data data = {
+ .check_type = check_type,
+ .old_type = old_type
+ };
- /*
- * Left range could be head or tail, so need to update
- * the size first:
- */
- entry->size -= final_end - final_start;
- if (entry->addr < final_start)
- continue;
+ printk(KERN_DEBUG "e820: remove [mem %#018Lx-%#018Lx] ", start,
+ start + size - 1);
+ if (check_type)
+ e820_print_type(old_type);
+ pr_cont("\n");
- entry->addr = final_end;
- }
- return real_removed_size;
+ return __e820__handle_range_update(e820_table, start, size, &updater,
+ &data);
}
void __init e820__update_table_print(void)
--
2.30.2
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2022-04-25 17:16 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 20+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2022-04-25 17:15 [PATCH v7 0/8] x86: Show in sysfs if a memory node is able to do encryption Martin Fernandez
2022-04-25 17:15 ` [PATCH v7 1/8] mm/memblock: Tag memblocks with crypto capabilities Martin Fernandez
2022-04-26 6:10 ` Mike Rapoport
2022-04-26 12:59 ` Martin Fernandez
2022-04-26 13:20 ` Mike Rapoport
2022-04-26 13:25 ` Daniel Gutson
2022-04-25 17:15 ` [PATCH v7 2/8] mm/mmzone: Tag pg_data_t " Martin Fernandez
2022-04-26 6:16 ` Mike Rapoport
2022-04-25 17:15 ` [PATCH v7 3/8] x86/e820: Add infrastructure to refactor e820__range_{update,remove} Martin Fernandez
2022-04-25 17:15 ` [PATCH v7 4/8] x86/e820: Refactor __e820__range_update Martin Fernandez
2022-04-25 17:15 ` Martin Fernandez [this message]
2022-04-26 15:10 ` [PATCH v7 5/8] x86/e820: Refactor e820__range_remove Dave Hansen
2022-04-26 17:37 ` Martin Fernandez
2022-04-26 17:55 ` Dave Hansen
2022-04-25 17:15 ` [PATCH v7 6/8] x86/e820: Tag e820_entry with crypto capabilities Martin Fernandez
2022-04-25 17:15 ` [PATCH v7 7/8] x86/efi: Mark e820_entries as crypto capable from EFI memmap Martin Fernandez
2022-04-25 17:15 ` [PATCH v7 8/8] drivers/node: Show in sysfs node's crypto capabilities Martin Fernandez
2022-04-26 6:16 ` Mike Rapoport
2022-04-26 13:01 ` Martin Fernandez
2022-04-25 17:23 ` [PATCH v7 0/8] x86: Show in sysfs if a memory node is able to do encryption Andrew Morton
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20220425171526.44925-6-martin.fernandez@eclypsium.com \
--to=martin.fernandez@eclypsium.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=alex.bazhaniuk@eclypsium.com \
--cc=alison.schofield@intel.com \
--cc=andy@infradead.org \
--cc=ardb@kernel.org \
--cc=bp@alien8.de \
--cc=daniel.gutson@eclypsium.com \
--cc=dave.hansen@linux.intel.com \
--cc=dvhart@infradead.org \
--cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=hpa@zytor.com \
--cc=hughsient@gmail.com \
--cc=keescook@chromium.org \
--cc=linux-efi@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=platform-driver-x86@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=rafael@kernel.org \
--cc=rppt@kernel.org \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=x86@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox