From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from kanga.kvack.org (kanga.kvack.org [205.233.56.17]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 23657C433F5 for ; Wed, 20 Apr 2022 05:57:14 +0000 (UTC) Received: by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix) id 4D8906B0072; Wed, 20 Apr 2022 01:57:14 -0400 (EDT) Received: by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix, from userid 40) id 463806B0073; Wed, 20 Apr 2022 01:57:14 -0400 (EDT) X-Delivered-To: int-list-linux-mm@kvack.org Received: by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix, from userid 63042) id 300CF6B0074; Wed, 20 Apr 2022 01:57:14 -0400 (EDT) X-Delivered-To: linux-mm@kvack.org Received: from relay.hostedemail.com (relay.hostedemail.com [64.99.140.26]) by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1DAFD6B0072 for ; Wed, 20 Apr 2022 01:57:14 -0400 (EDT) Received: from smtpin17.hostedemail.com (a10.router.float.18 [10.200.18.1]) by unirelay11.hostedemail.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E74C882429 for ; Wed, 20 Apr 2022 05:57:13 +0000 (UTC) X-FDA: 79376199546.17.DDDD52C Received: from mga18.intel.com (mga18.intel.com [134.134.136.126]) by imf04.hostedemail.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4198B40011 for ; Wed, 20 Apr 2022 05:57:11 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=intel.com; i=@intel.com; q=dns/txt; s=Intel; t=1650434232; x=1681970232; h=date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references: mime-version:in-reply-to; bh=CZ1JOJ+mMeulFOggpIddH8bXOC+ND2fBiLTwfYR+CQk=; b=gOsCDzqGJT98AigKp8EWplXyHeWxLfMAg331yXWRgPbAkwFeBh2ftnFC iKCVrDGwXWhhlYc2Vje4YS9y1IExPdobzx6zQ+GKsNhLG2HazpSBXnORq 13L1ITkFlD3t0U3tJjlQFKZi+tNAeVwFgqWXrzumeZW7y3vmFwnibB/9D zq5LTxYT4XwHXmQwKlwtBLWSEjHd1sm9dnRp44jr70XhBx5uGoaKNBlZO S5lw9HqSQrGruwuV9FjaOXIhCcDkv9LbvF9yrVG7J7LeYEwkoo1P/FEyN oTzO7+vgUV+yUExTOAxxqoN5Iw56Bkfsencpu0POvzpBSr7vbzaUsKxZ3 Q==; X-IronPort-AV: E=McAfee;i="6400,9594,10322"; a="245840798" X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.90,274,1643702400"; d="scan'208";a="245840798" Received: from orsmga005.jf.intel.com ([10.7.209.41]) by orsmga106.jf.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 19 Apr 2022 22:57:10 -0700 X-ExtLoop1: 1 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.90,274,1643702400"; d="scan'208";a="727350040" Received: from lkp-server01.sh.intel.com (HELO 3abc53900bec) ([10.239.97.150]) by orsmga005.jf.intel.com with ESMTP; 19 Apr 2022 22:57:06 -0700 Received: from kbuild by 3abc53900bec with local (Exim 4.95) (envelope-from ) id 1nh3Kr-0006dF-NC; Wed, 20 Apr 2022 05:57:05 +0000 Date: Wed, 20 Apr 2022 13:56:34 +0800 From: kernel test robot To: Peter Xu , Miaohe Lin Cc: llvm@lists.linux.dev, kbuild-all@lists.01.org, akpm@linux-foundation.org, willy@infradead.org, vbabka@suse.cz, dhowells@redhat.com, neilb@suse.de, david@redhat.com, apopple@nvidia.com, surenb@google.com, minchan@kernel.org, sfr@canb.auug.org.au, rcampbell@nvidia.com, naoya.horiguchi@nec.com, linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH] mm/swap: Fix lost swap bits in unuse_pte() Message-ID: <202204201313.QYiDBRbL-lkp@intel.com> References: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.10.1 (2018-07-13) X-Rspam-User: X-Rspamd-Server: rspam06 X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 4198B40011 X-Stat-Signature: rahzrodaikgcqjf1o3j3iy64asj9fm3x Authentication-Results: imf04.hostedemail.com; dkim=pass header.d=intel.com header.s=Intel header.b=gOsCDzqG; dmarc=pass (policy=none) header.from=intel.com; spf=none (imf04.hostedemail.com: domain of lkp@intel.com has no SPF policy when checking 134.134.136.126) smtp.mailfrom=lkp@intel.com X-HE-Tag: 1650434231-230699 X-Bogosity: Ham, tests=bogofilter, spamicity=0.000000, version=1.2.4 Sender: owner-linux-mm@kvack.org Precedence: bulk X-Loop: owner-majordomo@kvack.org List-ID: Hi Peter, Thank you for the patch! Yet something to improve: [auto build test ERROR on hnaz-mm/master] url: https://github.com/intel-lab-lkp/linux/commits/Peter-Xu/mm-swap-Fix-lost-swap-bits-in-unuse_pte/20220420-053845 base: https://github.com/hnaz/linux-mm master config: s390-randconfig-r023-20220420 (https://download.01.org/0day-ci/archive/20220420/202204201313.QYiDBRbL-lkp@intel.com/config) compiler: clang version 15.0.0 (https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project bac6cd5bf85669e3376610cfc4c4f9ca015e7b9b) reproduce (this is a W=1 build): wget https://raw.githubusercontent.com/intel/lkp-tests/master/sbin/make.cross -O ~/bin/make.cross chmod +x ~/bin/make.cross # install s390 cross compiling tool for clang build # apt-get install binutils-s390x-linux-gnu # https://github.com/intel-lab-lkp/linux/commit/355ac3eb45402f7aab25b76af029d4390af05238 git remote add linux-review https://github.com/intel-lab-lkp/linux git fetch --no-tags linux-review Peter-Xu/mm-swap-Fix-lost-swap-bits-in-unuse_pte/20220420-053845 git checkout 355ac3eb45402f7aab25b76af029d4390af05238 # save the config file mkdir build_dir && cp config build_dir/.config COMPILER_INSTALL_PATH=$HOME/0day COMPILER=clang make.cross W=1 O=build_dir ARCH=s390 SHELL=/bin/bash If you fix the issue, kindly add following tag as appropriate Reported-by: kernel test robot All errors (new ones prefixed by >>): >> mm/swapfile.c:1824:2: error: use of undeclared identifier 'new_pte'; did you mean 'newpte'? new_pte = pte_mkold(mk_pte(page, vma->vm_page_prot)); ^~~~~~~ newpte mm/swapfile.c:1786:14: note: 'newpte' declared here pte_t *pte, newpte; ^ mm/swapfile.c:1826:26: error: use of undeclared identifier 'new_pte' pte = pte_mksoft_dirty(new_pte); ^ mm/swapfile.c:1828:23: error: use of undeclared identifier 'new_pte' pte = pte_mkuffd_wp(new_pte); ^ mm/swapfile.c:1829:36: error: use of undeclared identifier 'new_pte'; did you mean 'newpte'? set_pte_at(vma->vm_mm, addr, pte, new_pte); ^~~~~~~ newpte mm/swapfile.c:1786:14: note: 'newpte' declared here pte_t *pte, newpte; ^ 4 errors generated. vim +1824 mm/swapfile.c 1775 1776 /* 1777 * No need to decide whether this PTE shares the swap entry with others, 1778 * just let do_wp_page work it out if a write is requested later - to 1779 * force COW, vm_page_prot omits write permission from any private vma. 1780 */ 1781 static int unuse_pte(struct vm_area_struct *vma, pmd_t *pmd, 1782 unsigned long addr, swp_entry_t entry, struct page *page) 1783 { 1784 struct page *swapcache; 1785 spinlock_t *ptl; 1786 pte_t *pte, newpte; 1787 int ret = 1; 1788 1789 swapcache = page; 1790 page = ksm_might_need_to_copy(page, vma, addr); 1791 if (unlikely(!page)) 1792 return -ENOMEM; 1793 1794 pte = pte_offset_map_lock(vma->vm_mm, pmd, addr, &ptl); 1795 if (unlikely(!pte_same_as_swp(*pte, swp_entry_to_pte(entry)))) { 1796 ret = 0; 1797 goto out; 1798 } 1799 1800 /* See do_swap_page() */ 1801 BUG_ON(!PageAnon(page) && PageMappedToDisk(page)); 1802 BUG_ON(PageAnon(page) && PageAnonExclusive(page)); 1803 1804 dec_mm_counter(vma->vm_mm, MM_SWAPENTS); 1805 inc_mm_counter(vma->vm_mm, MM_ANONPAGES); 1806 get_page(page); 1807 if (page == swapcache) { 1808 rmap_t rmap_flags = RMAP_NONE; 1809 1810 /* 1811 * See do_swap_page(): PageWriteback() would be problematic. 1812 * However, we do a wait_on_page_writeback() just before this 1813 * call and have the page locked. 1814 */ 1815 VM_BUG_ON_PAGE(PageWriteback(page), page); 1816 if (pte_swp_exclusive(*pte)) 1817 rmap_flags |= RMAP_EXCLUSIVE; 1818 1819 page_add_anon_rmap(page, vma, addr, rmap_flags); 1820 } else { /* ksm created a completely new copy */ 1821 page_add_new_anon_rmap(page, vma, addr); 1822 lru_cache_add_inactive_or_unevictable(page, vma); 1823 } > 1824 new_pte = pte_mkold(mk_pte(page, vma->vm_page_prot)); 1825 if (pte_swp_soft_dirty(*pte)) 1826 pte = pte_mksoft_dirty(new_pte); 1827 if (pte_swp_uffd_wp(*pte)) 1828 pte = pte_mkuffd_wp(new_pte); 1829 set_pte_at(vma->vm_mm, addr, pte, new_pte); 1830 swap_free(entry); 1831 out: 1832 pte_unmap_unlock(pte, ptl); 1833 if (page != swapcache) { 1834 unlock_page(page); 1835 put_page(page); 1836 } 1837 return ret; 1838 } 1839 -- 0-DAY CI Kernel Test Service https://01.org/lkp