From: Feng Tang <feng.tang@intel.com>
To: Zefan Li <lizefan.x@bytedance.com>, Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>,
Johannes Weiner <hannes@cmpxchg.org>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
Michal Hocko <mhocko@kernel.org>,
cgroups@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org
Cc: Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@intel.com>,
ying.huang@intel.com, Feng Tang <feng.tang@intel.com>
Subject: [RFC PATCH] cgroup/cpuset: fix a memory binding failure for cgroup v2
Date: Tue, 19 Apr 2022 10:09:58 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20220419020958.40419-1-feng.tang@intel.com> (raw)
We got report that setting cpuset.mems failed when the nodemask
contains a newly onlined memory node (not enumerated during boot)
for cgroup v2, while the binding succeeded for cgroup v1.
The root cause is, for cgroup v2, when a new memory node is onlined,
top_cpuset's 'mem_allowed' is not updated with the new nodemask of
memory nodes, and the following setting memory nodemask will fail,
if the nodemask contains a new node.
Fix it by updating top_cpuset.mems_allowed right after the
new memory node is onlined, just like v1.
Signed-off-by: Feng Tang <feng.tang@intel.com>
---
Very likely I missed some details here, but it looks strange that
the top_cpuset.mem_allowed is not updatd even after we onlined
several memory nodes after boot.
kernel/cgroup/cpuset.c | 3 +--
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/kernel/cgroup/cpuset.c b/kernel/cgroup/cpuset.c
index 9390bfd9f1cd..b97caaf16374 100644
--- a/kernel/cgroup/cpuset.c
+++ b/kernel/cgroup/cpuset.c
@@ -3314,8 +3314,7 @@ static void cpuset_hotplug_workfn(struct work_struct *work)
/* synchronize mems_allowed to N_MEMORY */
if (mems_updated) {
spin_lock_irq(&callback_lock);
- if (!on_dfl)
- top_cpuset.mems_allowed = new_mems;
+ top_cpuset.mems_allowed = new_mems;
top_cpuset.effective_mems = new_mems;
spin_unlock_irq(&callback_lock);
update_tasks_nodemask(&top_cpuset);
--
2.27.0
next reply other threads:[~2022-04-19 2:10 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2022-04-19 2:09 Feng Tang [this message]
2022-04-21 22:22 ` Tejun Heo
2022-04-24 16:04 ` Waiman Long
2022-04-24 23:06 ` Waiman Long
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20220419020958.40419-1-feng.tang@intel.com \
--to=feng.tang@intel.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=cgroups@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=dave.hansen@intel.com \
--cc=hannes@cmpxchg.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=lizefan.x@bytedance.com \
--cc=mhocko@kernel.org \
--cc=tj@kernel.org \
--cc=ying.huang@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox