From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from kanga.kvack.org (kanga.kvack.org [205.233.56.17]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 76F92C433F5 for ; Thu, 7 Apr 2022 12:14:26 +0000 (UTC) Received: by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix) id DE2D26B0071; Thu, 7 Apr 2022 08:14:15 -0400 (EDT) Received: by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix, from userid 40) id D6AB36B0073; Thu, 7 Apr 2022 08:14:15 -0400 (EDT) X-Delivered-To: int-list-linux-mm@kvack.org Received: by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix, from userid 63042) id BE3C26B0074; Thu, 7 Apr 2022 08:14:15 -0400 (EDT) X-Delivered-To: linux-mm@kvack.org Received: from forelay.hostedemail.com (smtprelay0048.hostedemail.com [216.40.44.48]) by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id ADCE36B0071 for ; Thu, 7 Apr 2022 08:14:15 -0400 (EDT) Received: from smtpin26.hostedemail.com (10.5.19.251.rfc1918.com [10.5.19.251]) by forelay03.hostedemail.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5FB0E8249980 for ; Thu, 7 Apr 2022 12:14:05 +0000 (UTC) X-FDA: 79329974850.26.D205D32 Received: from gandalf.ozlabs.org (gandalf.ozlabs.org [150.107.74.76]) by imf15.hostedemail.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0F7C7A0005 for ; Thu, 7 Apr 2022 12:14:03 +0000 (UTC) Received: from authenticated.ozlabs.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange ECDHE (P-256) server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by mail.ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 4KZ0fW5j88z4xXx; Thu, 7 Apr 2022 22:13:55 +1000 (AEST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=canb.auug.org.au; s=201702; t=1649333641; bh=MSGiGfMrsCY+cwdbzhUi4BbKmNkxN9MYKn3xiEn0Dho=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:In-Reply-To:References:From; b=rNSjlqWeCTSM+gVyuKWTJLS1BrOfrrI0EGcvnfnXZkN74NktFoHqOJfIqKNja+eyZ sPy1hmVF5qqGjYqaV4G3k9PbZv29p9cu2MxTTiuTZei1SL5KpSLBIuaztOrL84KXHC mvTxXg50c2ZbD+qBZa/Jq3FBa70g6Yqs+Ga6zoz/+LScssPrfkZ2IR8WNDJONqhjcZ e323Zu1SG4X/cUJLy77WVNxjBFE277h5TgJfnWU8Ez5ZEREj6Y8mOiBXYQs1+ShYY/ FCPJcXSaQkPqr/WAIIE7hwaJrPnvaQstkFIRzLH8UoGycWs8Y5sSjnHSu1R8Eq4bin VqEZM92AXjCWw== Date: Thu, 7 Apr 2022 22:13:54 +1000 From: Stephen Rothwell To: Yu Zhao Cc: Linux-MM , Andi Kleen , Andrew Morton , Aneesh Kumar , Barry Song <21cnbao@gmail.com>, Catalin Marinas , Dave Hansen , Hillf Danton , Jens Axboe , Jesse Barnes , Johannes Weiner , Jonathan Corbet , Linus Torvalds , Matthew Wilcox , Mel Gorman , Michael Larabel , Michal Hocko , Mike Rapoport , Rik van Riel , Vlastimil Babka , Will Deacon , Ying Huang , Linux ARM , "open list:DOCUMENTATION" , linux-kernel , Kernel Page Reclaim v2 , "the arch/x86 maintainers" Subject: Re: [PATCH v10 00/14] Multi-Gen LRU Framework Message-ID: <20220407221354.5acc2711@canb.auug.org.au> In-Reply-To: References: <20220407031525.2368067-1-yuzhao@google.com> <20220407183112.2cb5b627@canb.auug.org.au> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="Sig_/6mpp.nsQNupxMrrWV5KylHR"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg=pgp-sha256 X-Rspamd-Server: rspam05 X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 0F7C7A0005 X-Stat-Signature: qsotdzxzfwm6warnygkwf48iunet6sgw X-Rspam-User: Authentication-Results: imf15.hostedemail.com; dkim=pass header.d=canb.auug.org.au header.s=201702 header.b=rNSjlqWe; dmarc=none; spf=pass (imf15.hostedemail.com: domain of sfr@canb.auug.org.au designates 150.107.74.76 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=sfr@canb.auug.org.au X-HE-Tag: 1649333643-751748 X-Bogosity: Ham, tests=bogofilter, spamicity=0.000000, version=1.2.4 Sender: owner-linux-mm@kvack.org Precedence: bulk X-Loop: owner-majordomo@kvack.org List-ID: --Sig_/6mpp.nsQNupxMrrWV5KylHR Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Hi, On Thu, 7 Apr 2022 03:41:15 -0600 Yu Zhao wrote: > > > So, a couple of questions: > > > > Have you done a trial merge with a current linux-next tree to see what > > sort of mess/pain we may already be in? =20 >=20 > Yes, the repo I prepared for you is based on the latest linux-next. > There shouldn't be any conflicts. Ah, that is a problem :-( I can't merge a branch into linux-next if that branch is based on linux-next itself. linux-next rebases everyday, so that merge would bring in the previous version of linux-next - including other branches that may have rebased :-( All the branches in linux-next need to be based on Linus' tree or some tree that does not rebase (or one you can keep up with if it does rebase). The only exception is part of Andrew's patch series which is rebased (by me) on top of linux-next each day. > > Is it all stable enough now that it could be sent as a patch series for > > Andrew to include in mmotm (with perhaps just smallish followup patches= )? =20 >=20 > Yes, on multiple occasions, e.g., [1][2][3], I've claimed this > patchset has an unprecedented test coverage and nobody has proven > otherwise so far. >=20 > Andrew suggested a cycle in linux-next [4]. So here we are :) So the easiest thing for me is if Andrew takes it into his mmotm patch series (most of which ends up in linux-next). Otherwise I am probably at some point going to need help fixing the conflicts. --=20 Cheers, Stephen Rothwell --Sig_/6mpp.nsQNupxMrrWV5KylHR Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQEzBAEBCAAdFiEENIC96giZ81tWdLgKAVBC80lX0GwFAmJO1YIACgkQAVBC80lX 0Gw6cwf+MTaNNd0mEgs/tJ4oSFU0X67FO4pXdyzCjCdp1UB54niZQdb3kMqfc02a RRkhV0jDgdDYFiEsW3lsdb4qf+dOVx3CRFYz6u/gQ06xMe5CXo2BqvTd3gKmrYH0 uFSh0XaIdm2xW5WlQwg3gKgkgYlTNaqjt88X72GhV8HLPqgp58cl+APq/4UTz94+ 5GEdaKM9Nyec6todaeP1Ih7WlL4Nj6KV+TQPq9/y3Kipfa0teIQMQQaHplOzfyXh oUW58hcwYEaPuADo6SHMO0Ex6OtWE1PAe3OiYYMQ2dan3xU4hbQLtsUZGFJXdYR6 FpTRB/bJBWEeBekO3GsLLa8FrF1zLg== =HCxM -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --Sig_/6mpp.nsQNupxMrrWV5KylHR--