From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from kanga.kvack.org (kanga.kvack.org [205.233.56.17]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B2095C433EF for ; Tue, 5 Apr 2022 22:49:36 +0000 (UTC) Received: by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix) id 437796B0073; Tue, 5 Apr 2022 18:49:26 -0400 (EDT) Received: by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix, from userid 40) id 3E6D96B0074; Tue, 5 Apr 2022 18:49:26 -0400 (EDT) X-Delivered-To: int-list-linux-mm@kvack.org Received: by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix, from userid 63042) id 288BC6B0075; Tue, 5 Apr 2022 18:49:26 -0400 (EDT) X-Delivered-To: linux-mm@kvack.org Received: from forelay.hostedemail.com (smtprelay0072.hostedemail.com [216.40.44.72]) by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1A62E6B0073 for ; Tue, 5 Apr 2022 18:49:26 -0400 (EDT) Received: from smtpin26.hostedemail.com (10.5.19.251.rfc1918.com [10.5.19.251]) by forelay01.hostedemail.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id BD6EC183D2A09 for ; Tue, 5 Apr 2022 22:49:15 +0000 (UTC) X-FDA: 79324317870.26.182509D Received: from dfw.source.kernel.org (dfw.source.kernel.org [139.178.84.217]) by imf18.hostedemail.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1741F1C0022 for ; Tue, 5 Apr 2022 22:49:14 +0000 (UTC) Received: from smtp.kernel.org (relay.kernel.org [52.25.139.140]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by dfw.source.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 3B159619F3; Tue, 5 Apr 2022 22:49:14 +0000 (UTC) Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 2ACC3C385A0; Tue, 5 Apr 2022 22:49:13 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=linux-foundation.org; s=korg; t=1649198953; bh=awHlS99jHdeeMvW5vMaa8y/eOaLgtQdto8jxDdWuvoQ=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:In-Reply-To:References:From; b=yW8xzL99stdIIsz1Uwj8ViHVbX6o3MGkdk44C90KDUPId1u1fTiKrM/mhj+w9my6a NKkuPzZ8tep66QFQCMXVXJvbzDykqLe9xpPaHvZNa9ngt2PRiTliYYyLF+A/hMVXPj 95uIs5AyCqnV6GBbZyjMH3A/pUDCQIgmIOEYVc2E= Date: Tue, 5 Apr 2022 15:49:12 -0700 From: Andrew Morton To: Peter Xu Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org, Mike Kravetz , David Hildenbrand , Matthew Wilcox , Alistair Popple , Nadav Amit , Axel Rasmussen , Andrea Arcangeli , "Kirill A . Shutemov" , Hugh Dickins , Jerome Glisse , Mike Rapoport Subject: Re: [PATCH v8 00/23] userfaultfd-wp: Support shmem and hugetlbfs Message-Id: <20220405154912.4cda03c2cc5d801d25d5c2dd@linux-foundation.org> In-Reply-To: References: <20220405014646.13522-1-peterx@redhat.com> <20220405151616.bf25fa4aad55536cd031e1ab@linux-foundation.org> X-Mailer: Sylpheed 3.7.0 (GTK+ 2.24.33; x86_64-redhat-linux-gnu) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Rspamd-Server: rspam04 X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 1741F1C0022 X-Stat-Signature: ug1ho6bz1m59bmnjwahturt6znwtmas1 Authentication-Results: imf18.hostedemail.com; dkim=pass header.d=linux-foundation.org header.s=korg header.b=yW8xzL99; dmarc=none; spf=pass (imf18.hostedemail.com: domain of akpm@linux-foundation.org designates 139.178.84.217 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=akpm@linux-foundation.org X-Rspam-User: X-HE-Tag: 1649198954-255172 X-Bogosity: Ham, tests=bogofilter, spamicity=0.000000, version=1.2.4 Sender: owner-linux-mm@kvack.org Precedence: bulk X-Loop: owner-majordomo@kvack.org List-ID: On Tue, 5 Apr 2022 18:42:43 -0400 Peter Xu wrote: > On Tue, Apr 05, 2022 at 03:16:16PM -0700, Andrew Morton wrote: > > On Mon, 4 Apr 2022 21:46:23 -0400 Peter Xu wrote: > > > > > This is v8 of the series to add shmem+hugetlbfs support for userfaultfd > > > write protection. > > > > Various compilation catastrophes with x86_64 allnoconfig. I poked at > > the include ordering for a while but other things quickly became more > > attractive ;) > > Sorry about that. I still don't know what's the problem, but I'll give it > a shot soon. > > I think I only tried out with the new configs but not all the rest configs. > I thought there're some bot looking after that one, from which I used to > receive build reports. And IIRC I fixed some build issues in early versions > from those reports. Maybe I was wrong.. > > Any more hints on the latter? `make allnoconfig'?