[patch 06/16] mm/munlock: add lru_add_drain() to fix memcg_stat_test

[Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>]

From: Hugh Dickins <hughd@google.com>
Subject: mm/munlock: add lru_add_drain() to fix memcg_stat_test

Mike reports that LTP memcg_stat_test usually leads to...
memcg_stat_test 3 TINFO: Test unevictable with MAP_LOCKED
memcg_stat_test 3 TINFO: Running memcg_process --mmap-lock1 -s 135168
memcg_stat_test 3 TINFO: Warming up pid: 3460
memcg_stat_test 3 TINFO: Process is still here after warm up: 3460
memcg_stat_test 3 TFAIL: unevictable is 122880, 135168 expected
...but may lead to...
memcg_stat_test 4 TINFO: Test unevictable with mlock
memcg_stat_test 4 TINFO: Running memcg_process --mmap-lock2 -s 135168
memcg_stat_test 4 TINFO: Warming up pid: 4271
memcg_stat_test 4 TINFO: Process is still here after warm up: 4271
memcg_stat_test 4 TFAIL: unevictable is 122880, 135168 expected
...or both.  A wee bit flaky.

follow_page_pte() used to have an lru_add_drain() per each page mlocked,
and the test came to rely on accurate stats.  The pagevec to be drained is
different now, but still covered by lru_add_drain(); and, never mind the
test, I believe it's in everyone's interest that a bulk faulting interface
like populate_vma_page_range() or faultin_vma_page_range() should drain
its local pagevecs at the end, to save others sometimes needing the much
more expensive lru_add_drain_all().  This does not absolutely guarantee
exact stats - the mlocking task can be migrated between CPUs as it
proceeds - but it's good enough and the tests pass.

Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/47f6d39c-a075-50cb-1cfb-26dd957a48af@google.com
Fixes: b67bf49ce7aa ("mm/munlock: delete FOLL_MLOCK and FOLL_POPULATE")
Signed-off-by: Hugh Dickins <hughd@google.com>
Reported-by: Mike Galbraith <efault@gmx.de>
Cc: Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@suse.cz>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
---

 mm/gup.c |   10 ++++++++--
 1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

--- a/mm/gup.c~mm-munlock-add-lru_add_drain-to-fix-memcg_stat_test
+++ a/mm/gup.c
@@ -1404,6 +1404,7 @@ long populate_vma_page_range(struct vm_a
 	struct mm_struct *mm = vma->vm_mm;
 	unsigned long nr_pages = (end - start) / PAGE_SIZE;
 	int gup_flags;
+	long ret;
 
 	VM_BUG_ON(!PAGE_ALIGNED(start));
 	VM_BUG_ON(!PAGE_ALIGNED(end));
@@ -1438,8 +1439,10 @@ long populate_vma_page_range(struct vm_a
 	 * We made sure addr is within a VMA, so the following will
 	 * not result in a stack expansion that recurses back here.
 	 */
-	return __get_user_pages(mm, start, nr_pages, gup_flags,
+	ret = __get_user_pages(mm, start, nr_pages, gup_flags,
 				NULL, NULL, locked);
+	lru_add_drain();
+	return ret;
 }
 
 /*
@@ -1471,6 +1474,7 @@ long faultin_vma_page_range(struct vm_ar
 	struct mm_struct *mm = vma->vm_mm;
 	unsigned long nr_pages = (end - start) / PAGE_SIZE;
 	int gup_flags;
+	long ret;
 
 	VM_BUG_ON(!PAGE_ALIGNED(start));
 	VM_BUG_ON(!PAGE_ALIGNED(end));
@@ -1498,8 +1502,10 @@ long faultin_vma_page_range(struct vm_ar
 	if (check_vma_flags(vma, gup_flags))
 		return -EINVAL;
 
-	return __get_user_pages(mm, start, nr_pages, gup_flags,
+	ret = __get_user_pages(mm, start, nr_pages, gup_flags,
 				NULL, NULL, locked);
+	lru_add_drain();
+	return ret;
 }
 
 /*
_