* [PATCH] mm/vmalloc: fix a comment
@ 2022-04-01 6:45 Yixuan Cao
0 siblings, 0 replies; only message in thread
From: Yixuan Cao @ 2022-04-01 6:45 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: akpm
Cc: linux-mm, yejiajian2018, zhangyinan2019, zhaochongxi2019,
hanshenghong2019, yuhongf, linux-kernel, Yixuan Cao
The sentence
"but the mempolcy want to alloc memory by interleaving"
should be rephrased with
"but the mempolicy wants to alloc memory by interleaving"
where "mempolicy" is a struct name.
This work is coauthored by
Yinan Zhang
Jiajian Ye
Shenghong Han
Chongxi Zhao
Yuhong Feng
Yongqiang Liu
Signed-off-by: Yixuan Cao <caoyixuan2019@email.szu.edu.cn>
---
mm/vmalloc.c | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/mm/vmalloc.c b/mm/vmalloc.c
index e163372d3967..d0111d1e370d 100644
--- a/mm/vmalloc.c
+++ b/mm/vmalloc.c
@@ -2903,7 +2903,7 @@ vm_area_alloc_pages(gfp_t gfp, int nid,
/* memory allocation should consider mempolicy, we can't
* wrongly use nearest node when nid == NUMA_NO_NODE,
* otherwise memory may be allocated in only one node,
- * but mempolcy want to alloc memory by interleaving.
+ * but mempolicy wants to alloc memory by interleaving.
*/
if (IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_NUMA) && nid == NUMA_NO_NODE)
nr = alloc_pages_bulk_array_mempolicy(bulk_gfp,
--
2.31.1
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] only message in thread
only message in thread, other threads:[~2022-04-01 6:46 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: (only message) (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2022-04-01 6:45 [PATCH] mm/vmalloc: fix a comment Yixuan Cao
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox