From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from kanga.kvack.org (kanga.kvack.org [205.233.56.17]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2EC8FC433F5 for ; Wed, 30 Mar 2022 06:53:49 +0000 (UTC) Received: by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix) id B73678D0003; Wed, 30 Mar 2022 02:53:48 -0400 (EDT) Received: by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix, from userid 40) id B22048D0001; Wed, 30 Mar 2022 02:53:48 -0400 (EDT) X-Delivered-To: int-list-linux-mm@kvack.org Received: by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix, from userid 63042) id 9EA2A8D0003; Wed, 30 Mar 2022 02:53:48 -0400 (EDT) X-Delivered-To: linux-mm@kvack.org Received: from forelay.hostedemail.com (smtprelay0137.hostedemail.com [216.40.44.137]) by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 904608D0001 for ; Wed, 30 Mar 2022 02:53:48 -0400 (EDT) Received: from smtpin21.hostedemail.com (10.5.19.251.rfc1918.com [10.5.19.251]) by forelay03.hostedemail.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3C2CD8249980 for ; Wed, 30 Mar 2022 06:53:48 +0000 (UTC) X-FDA: 79300137336.21.8A7BC97 Received: from mga04.intel.com (mga04.intel.com [192.55.52.120]) by imf04.hostedemail.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5F2EB40006 for ; Wed, 30 Mar 2022 06:53:47 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=intel.com; i=@intel.com; q=dns/txt; s=Intel; t=1648623227; x=1680159227; h=date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:mime-version; bh=cm7zalOPVoseD2/NZNf63+7ZwazgOQ0XcSWIJMqTgps=; b=Fjj1LUrZN1hR6S8MBVly87JIxptkX2K9OhVoVDeQMkqqTFTnBNNN2W1s 8KjINg/DE+joNmw4aecbMXzSaCWVcoPJgxZKUDTReb58mu+9C3NNe1ZU+ RXzL5TgYomy+d6Ki+/lZhMwx7ghVn3dSQYAVedhWQ3JabvR8Lm9o7+Vig 0Wee+vOAlyB/0fYF9sBKDUrlaMjHYCY5uaGTFzLpsoF6yNQNb4ekoynHT huhkQRNg1lmRJcX9i7u6E1F4ripPxwPaFNs9BUzScE9oq8BKLuNYNtuGg pBo0aGUootcjTzhejaMFylIFk+UYx0mqivOZvSAR/yK0VYOiQGEmID6lb w==; X-IronPort-AV: E=McAfee;i="6200,9189,10301"; a="258292471" X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.90,221,1643702400"; d="scan'208";a="258292471" Received: from orsmga003.jf.intel.com ([10.7.209.27]) by fmsmga104.fm.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 29 Mar 2022 23:53:45 -0700 X-ExtLoop1: 1 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.90,222,1643702400"; d="scan'208";a="503198264" Received: from lkp-server01.sh.intel.com (HELO 3965e2759b93) ([10.239.97.150]) by orsmga003.jf.intel.com with ESMTP; 29 Mar 2022 23:53:43 -0700 Received: from kbuild by 3965e2759b93 with local (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1nZSD8-000150-GS; Wed, 30 Mar 2022 06:53:42 +0000 Date: Wed, 30 Mar 2022 14:53:14 +0800 From: kernel test robot To: Roman Gushchin Cc: llvm@lists.linux.dev, kbuild-all@lists.01.org, GNU/Weeb Mailing List , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Suren Baghdasaryan , Mike Rapoport , Andrew Morton , Linux Memory Management List , Minchan Kim Subject: [ammarfaizi2-block:google/android/kernel/common/android12-trusty-5.10 4036/5872] WARNING: modpost: vmlinux.o(.text+0x4111c4): Section mismatch in reference from the function memblock_bottom_up() to the variable .meminit.data:memblock Message-ID: <202203301412.MZ7wQvQz-lkp@intel.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.10.1 (2018-07-13) X-Rspamd-Server: rspam06 X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 5F2EB40006 X-Rspam-User: Authentication-Results: imf04.hostedemail.com; dkim=pass header.d=intel.com header.s=Intel header.b=Fjj1LUrZ; dmarc=pass (policy=none) header.from=intel.com; spf=none (imf04.hostedemail.com: domain of lkp@intel.com has no SPF policy when checking 192.55.52.120) smtp.mailfrom=lkp@intel.com X-Stat-Signature: f6saus7p85dzgsfe6qgtcxizyrzrursw X-HE-Tag: 1648623227-282384 X-Bogosity: Ham, tests=bogofilter, spamicity=0.000267, version=1.2.4 Sender: owner-linux-mm@kvack.org Precedence: bulk X-Loop: owner-majordomo@kvack.org List-ID: Hi Roman, FYI, the error/warning still remains. tree: https://github.com/ammarfaizi2/linux-block google/android/kernel/common/android12-trusty-5.10 head: 07055bfd3d810d41a38354693dfaa55a6f8c0025 commit: 0e0bfc41fdf4d79d39ebe929844cdee44f97366d [4036/5872] UPSTREAM: mm: cma: allocate cma areas bottom-up config: x86_64-randconfig-a005 (https://download.01.org/0day-ci/archive/20220330/202203301412.MZ7wQvQz-lkp@intel.com/config) compiler: clang version 15.0.0 (https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project 0f6d9501cf49ce02937099350d08f20c4af86f3d) reproduce (this is a W=1 build): wget https://raw.githubusercontent.com/intel/lkp-tests/master/sbin/make.cross -O ~/bin/make.cross chmod +x ~/bin/make.cross # https://github.com/ammarfaizi2/linux-block/commit/0e0bfc41fdf4d79d39ebe929844cdee44f97366d git remote add ammarfaizi2-block https://github.com/ammarfaizi2/linux-block git fetch --no-tags ammarfaizi2-block google/android/kernel/common/android12-trusty-5.10 git checkout 0e0bfc41fdf4d79d39ebe929844cdee44f97366d # save the config file to linux build tree mkdir build_dir COMPILER_INSTALL_PATH=$HOME/0day COMPILER=clang make.cross W=1 O=build_dir ARCH=x86_64 SHELL=/bin/bash If you fix the issue, kindly add following tag as appropriate Reported-by: kernel test robot All warnings (new ones prefixed by >>, old ones prefixed by <<): >> WARNING: modpost: vmlinux.o(.text+0x4111c4): Section mismatch in reference from the function memblock_bottom_up() to the variable .meminit.data:memblock The function memblock_bottom_up() references the variable __meminitdata memblock. This is often because memblock_bottom_up lacks a __meminitdata annotation or the annotation of memblock is wrong. -- 0-DAY CI Kernel Test Service https://01.org/lkp