From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from kanga.kvack.org (kanga.kvack.org [205.233.56.17]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 282BEC433EF for ; Sat, 26 Mar 2022 20:49:35 +0000 (UTC) Received: by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix) id 91E5A8D0001; Sat, 26 Mar 2022 16:49:34 -0400 (EDT) Received: by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix, from userid 40) id 8CE2F6B0073; Sat, 26 Mar 2022 16:49:34 -0400 (EDT) X-Delivered-To: int-list-linux-mm@kvack.org Received: by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix, from userid 63042) id 794778D0001; Sat, 26 Mar 2022 16:49:34 -0400 (EDT) X-Delivered-To: linux-mm@kvack.org Received: from relay.hostedemail.com (relay.a.hostedemail.com [64.99.140.24]) by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 699E26B0072 for ; Sat, 26 Mar 2022 16:49:34 -0400 (EDT) Received: from smtpin03.hostedemail.com (a10.router.float.18 [10.200.18.1]) by unirelay07.hostedemail.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 35D3C20BDE for ; Sat, 26 Mar 2022 20:49:34 +0000 (UTC) X-FDA: 79287728268.03.2046992 Received: from ams.source.kernel.org (ams.source.kernel.org [145.40.68.75]) by imf02.hostedemail.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 733FC8001E for ; Sat, 26 Mar 2022 20:49:33 +0000 (UTC) Received: from smtp.kernel.org (relay.kernel.org [52.25.139.140]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ams.source.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 82970B80B86; Sat, 26 Mar 2022 20:49:31 +0000 (UTC) Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id DA042C340E8; Sat, 26 Mar 2022 20:49:28 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=linux-foundation.org; s=korg; t=1648327770; bh=IktWC4ucg9Ce3DLRBDeCA8ID2ASlrSP7xzkWdP13BC4=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:In-Reply-To:References:From; b=WBDi+wSf82980ZGn1NEqQPX4O7U7OdIYhHFLaHrA9l3hMmq+nGE3CXLZaIy/MxCSD ZYlhiNsONhPR44QGsKc7ONbwsGO07gWzYWmEijdQYog+S8gBKrzlLZzuHeh71WRPCf TQNHb13unOP2P7K2yM1QihDyHRP4N5u7+eBHNpC8= Date: Sat, 26 Mar 2022 13:49:28 -0700 From: Andrew Morton To: Yu Zhao Cc: Linus Torvalds , Andi Kleen , Aneesh Kumar , Barry Song , Brian Geffon , Catalin Marinas , Daniel Byrne , Dave Hansen , Donald Carr , Hillf Danton , Holger =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Hoffst=E4tte?= , Jan Alexander Steffens , Jens Axboe , Jesse Barnes , Johannes Weiner , Jonathan Corbet , Konstantin Kharlamov , Matthew Wilcox , Mel Gorman , Michael Larabel , Michal Hocko , Mike Rapoport , Oleksandr Natalenko , Rik van Riel , Shuang Zhai , Sofia Trinh , Steven Barrett , Suleiman Souhlal , Vaibhav Jain , Vlastimil Babka , Will Deacon , Ying Huang , Linux ARM , "open list:DOCUMENTATION" , Linux Kernel Mailing List , Linux-MM , Kernel Page Reclaim v2 , "the arch/x86 maintainers" Subject: Re: [page-reclaim] Re: [GIT PULL] Multi-gen LRU for 5.18-rc1 Message-Id: <20220326134928.ad739eeecd5d0855dbdc6257@linux-foundation.org> In-Reply-To: References: <20220326010003.3155137-1-yuzhao@google.com> X-Mailer: Sylpheed 3.7.0 (GTK+ 2.24.33; x86_64-redhat-linux-gnu) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Rspamd-Server: rspam09 X-Rspam-User: X-Stat-Signature: 6dtjh8g8txsw9rduf1ky4czha5p3bs99 Authentication-Results: imf02.hostedemail.com; dkim=pass header.d=linux-foundation.org header.s=korg header.b=WBDi+wSf; dmarc=none; spf=pass (imf02.hostedemail.com: domain of akpm@linux-foundation.org designates 145.40.68.75 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=akpm@linux-foundation.org X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 733FC8001E X-HE-Tag: 1648327773-775736 X-Bogosity: Ham, tests=bogofilter, spamicity=0.000000, version=1.2.4 Sender: owner-linux-mm@kvack.org Precedence: bulk X-Loop: owner-majordomo@kvack.org List-ID: On Fri, 25 Mar 2022 19:16:15 -0600 Yu Zhao wrote: > On Fri, Mar 25, 2022 at 7:07 PM Linus Torvalds > wrote: > > > > On Fri, Mar 25, 2022 at 6:00 PM Yu Zhao wrote: > > > > > > This is more of an option than a request for 5.18. I'm sending it to > > > you directly because, in my judgement, it's now as ready as it'll ever > > > be. > > > > So I do expect to merge this, but I don't think it has been in > > linux-next, has it? > > No. I could ask Stephen to see if he is willing to take this series. I > was hoping to go through Andrew since his tree is what most MM > developers test. I haven't heard from Andrew, so I assume he has no > strong opinion and I don't want to put him in a different position. hm, sorry, something in the headers here fooled my (elaborate) procmail rules :( Please yes, let's have a cycle in -next. I thought we decided to do that in discussion with Matthew Wilcox? Also, sorry, but I'm not seeing many commonly-seen names amongst the reviewers. I'd be more comfortable if people who have done most work on page reclaim up to this time have had time to review and comment.