From: Barry Song <21cnbao@gmail.com>
To: walken@google.com
Cc: Liam.Howlett@oracle.com, akpm@linux-foundation.org,
dave@stgolabs.net, jglisse@redhat.com, ldufour@linux.ibm.com,
linux-mm@kvack.org, peterz@infradead.org, rientjes@google.com,
vbabka@suse.cz, willy@infradead.org
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 00/24] Fine grained MM locking
Date: Mon, 21 Mar 2022 11:08:48 +1300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20220320220848.15367-1-21cnbao@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20200224203057.162467-1-walken@google.com>
> Hi,
>
> This is the first version of my work towards fine grained MM locking.
> This is still early work - I am happy with my page fault changes,
> but want to expand on the mmap/munmap side of things before I send the
> next version. I have previously shared this with some of the copied folks
> (for those who received that, there are no additional changes in this
> public resend). Please expect a v2 within a few weeks, with further
> changes for fine grained range locking in the mmap and munmap paths.
hello, Michel. I noticed rwsem has been renamed to mmap_lock and
some apis were created for taking the lock.
but is the original fine grained mm locking series still under
development? maybe i missed something but i failed to find v2
for it.
Thanks
Barry
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2022-03-20 22:09 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 28+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2020-02-24 20:30 Michel Lespinasse
2020-02-24 20:30 ` [RFC PATCH 01/24] MM locking API: initial implementation as rwsem wrappers Michel Lespinasse
2020-02-24 20:30 ` [RFC PATCH 02/24] MM locking API: use coccinelle to convert mmap_sem rwsem call sites Michel Lespinasse
2020-02-24 20:30 ` [RFC PATCH 03/24] MM locking API: manual conversion of mmap_sem call sites missed by coccinelle Michel Lespinasse
2020-02-24 20:30 ` [RFC PATCH 04/24] MM locking API: add range arguments Michel Lespinasse
2020-02-24 20:30 ` [RFC PATCH 05/24] MM locking API: allow for sleeping during unlock Michel Lespinasse
2020-02-24 20:30 ` [RFC PATCH 06/24] MM locking API: implement fine grained range locks Michel Lespinasse
2020-02-24 20:30 ` [RFC PATCH 07/24] mm/memory: add range field to struct vm_fault Michel Lespinasse
2020-02-24 20:30 ` [RFC PATCH 08/24] mm/memory: allow specifying MM lock range to handle_mm_fault() Michel Lespinasse
2020-02-24 20:30 ` [RFC PATCH 09/24] do_swap_page: use the vmf->range field when dropping mmap_sem Michel Lespinasse
2020-02-24 20:30 ` [RFC PATCH 10/24] handle_userfault: " Michel Lespinasse
2020-02-24 20:30 ` [RFC PATCH 11/24] x86 fault handler: merge bad_area() functions Michel Lespinasse
2020-02-24 20:30 ` [RFC PATCH 12/24] x86 fault handler: use an explicit MM lock range Michel Lespinasse
2020-02-24 20:30 ` [RFC PATCH 13/24] mm/memory: add prepare_mm_fault() function Michel Lespinasse
2020-02-24 20:30 ` [RFC PATCH 14/24] mm/swap_state: disable swap vma readahead Michel Lespinasse
2020-02-24 20:30 ` [RFC PATCH 15/24] x86 fault handler: use a pseudo-vma when operating on anonymous vmas Michel Lespinasse
2020-02-24 20:30 ` [RFC PATCH 16/24] MM locking API: add vma locking API Michel Lespinasse
2020-02-24 20:30 ` [RFC PATCH 17/24] x86 fault handler: implement range locking Michel Lespinasse
2020-02-24 20:30 ` [RFC PATCH 18/24] shared file mappings: use the vmf->range field when dropping mmap_sem Michel Lespinasse
2020-02-24 20:30 ` [RFC PATCH 19/24] mm: add field to annotate vm_operations that support range locking Michel Lespinasse
2020-02-24 20:30 ` [RFC PATCH 20/24] x86 fault handler: extend range locking to supported file vmas Michel Lespinasse
2020-02-24 20:30 ` [RFC PATCH 21/24] do_mmap: add locked argument Michel Lespinasse
2020-02-24 20:30 ` [RFC PATCH 22/24] do_mmap: implement " Michel Lespinasse
2020-02-24 20:30 ` [RFC PATCH 23/24] do_mmap: use locked=false in vm_mmap_pgoff() and aio_setup_ring() Michel Lespinasse
2020-02-24 20:30 ` [RFC PATCH 24/24] do_mmap: implement easiest cases of fine grained locking Michel Lespinasse
2022-03-20 22:08 ` Barry Song [this message]
2022-03-20 23:14 ` [RFC PATCH 00/24] Fine grained MM locking Matthew Wilcox
2022-03-21 0:20 ` Barry Song
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20220320220848.15367-1-21cnbao@gmail.com \
--to=21cnbao@gmail.com \
--cc=Liam.Howlett@oracle.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=dave@stgolabs.net \
--cc=jglisse@redhat.com \
--cc=ldufour@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=rientjes@google.com \
--cc=vbabka@suse.cz \
--cc=walken@google.com \
--cc=willy@infradead.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox