linux-mm.kvack.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: sj@kernel.org
To: Baolin Wang <baolin.wang@linux.alibaba.com>
Cc: sj@kernel.org, akpm@linux-foundation.org, linux-mm@kvack.org,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] mm/damon: Make the sampling more accurate
Date: Fri, 18 Mar 2022 10:49:48 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20220318104948.26387-1-sj@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <5cb98e07-1e51-e376-8e67-dffc92f24941@linux.alibaba.com>

On Fri, 18 Mar 2022 18:01:19 +0800 Baolin Wang <baolin.wang@linux.alibaba.com> wrote:

> 
> On 3/18/2022 5:40 PM, sj@kernel.org wrote:
> > Hi Baolin,
> > 
> > On Fri, 18 Mar 2022 17:23:13 +0800 Baolin Wang <baolin.wang@linux.alibaba.com> wrote:
> > 
> >> When I try to sample the physical address with DAMON to migrate pages
> >> on tiered memory system, I found it will demote some cold regions mistakenly.
> >> Now we will choose an physical address in the region randomly, but if
> >> its corresponding page is not an online LRU page, we will ignore the
> >> accessing status in this cycle of sampling, and actually will be treated
> >> as a non-accessed region. Suppose a region including some non-LRU pages,
> >> it will be treated as a cold region with a high probability, and may be
> >> merged with adjacent cold regions, but there are some pages may be
> >> accessed we missed.
> >>
> >> So instead of ignoring the access status of this region if we did not find
> >> a valid page according to current sampling address, we can use last valid
> >> sampling address to help to make the sampling more accurate, then we can do
> >> a better decision.
> > 
> > Well...  Offlined pages are also a valid part of the memory region, so treating
> > those as not accessed and making the memory region containing the offlined
> > pages looks colder seems legal to me.  IOW, this approach could make memory
> > regions containing many non-online-LRU pages as hot.
> 
> IMO I don't think this is a problem, since if this region containing 
> many non-online-LRU pages is treated as hot, which means threre are aome 
> pages are hot, right? We can find them and promote them to fast memory 
> (or do other schemes). Meanwhile, for non-online-LRU pages, we can 
> filter them and do nothing for them, since we can not get a valid page 
> struct for them.

For some of DAMOS actions that you mentioned, that could make sense.  However,
that wouldn't make much sense for some other cases, especially for manual
DAMON-based access pattern profiling.

After all, we already have a mechanism for this case: adaptive regions
adjustment (or, regions split/merge).  That mechanism will eventually separate
out hot oneline-LRU pages in the memory regions.  Before the region is
adjusted, reporting the whole region as hot looks like a right result to me.
Of course, I admit that it could take too much time to converge to the optimal
regions, and there are many rooms for improvement of the regions adjustment
mechanism.  I think we should pursue the direction (improving the regions
adjustment mechanism).


FYI, I have some rough ideas for improving the mechanism including partitioning
regions into more than 2 sub-regions if we belive it is not making a good
progress.  Nevertheless, I'd like to first make a methodology for evaluating
current accuracy.  For that, I am planning to implement a page-granularity
access monitoring.


Thanks,
SJ

[...]


  reply	other threads:[~2022-03-18 10:49 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2022-03-18  9:23 Baolin Wang
2022-03-18  9:40 ` sj
2022-03-18 10:01   ` Baolin Wang
2022-03-18 10:49     ` sj [this message]
2022-03-18 11:58       ` Baolin Wang
2022-03-18 12:15         ` sj
2022-03-18 14:12           ` Baolin Wang

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20220318104948.26387-1-sj@kernel.org \
    --to=sj@kernel.org \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=baolin.wang@linux.alibaba.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox