From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from kanga.kvack.org (kanga.kvack.org [205.233.56.17]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F2649C433EF for ; Tue, 15 Mar 2022 23:48:11 +0000 (UTC) Received: by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix) id 15E058D0002; Tue, 15 Mar 2022 19:48:11 -0400 (EDT) Received: by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix, from userid 40) id 10D998D0001; Tue, 15 Mar 2022 19:48:11 -0400 (EDT) X-Delivered-To: int-list-linux-mm@kvack.org Received: by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix, from userid 63042) id F16928D0002; Tue, 15 Mar 2022 19:48:10 -0400 (EDT) X-Delivered-To: linux-mm@kvack.org Received: from forelay.hostedemail.com (smtprelay0198.hostedemail.com [216.40.44.198]) by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E172F8D0001 for ; Tue, 15 Mar 2022 19:48:10 -0400 (EDT) Received: from smtpin29.hostedemail.com (10.5.19.251.rfc1918.com [10.5.19.251]) by forelay01.hostedemail.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8229118259E54 for ; Tue, 15 Mar 2022 23:48:10 +0000 (UTC) X-FDA: 79248261540.29.1D92C3C Received: from dfw.source.kernel.org (dfw.source.kernel.org [139.178.84.217]) by imf28.hostedemail.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0AE04C0015 for ; Tue, 15 Mar 2022 23:48:09 +0000 (UTC) Received: from smtp.kernel.org (relay.kernel.org [52.25.139.140]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by dfw.source.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4995261521; Tue, 15 Mar 2022 23:48:09 +0000 (UTC) Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 4DA62C340F3; Tue, 15 Mar 2022 23:48:08 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=linux-foundation.org; s=korg; t=1647388088; bh=lFbXIDa4QnBNJa5XI+6aSCuy5aLkXoZmkzSUjIS9Nus=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:In-Reply-To:References:From; b=nyfrMxNivbfRHfA/kgKORjOUDtNO0xiJdHK0Zph9F8/JEoL/jy+f1ikCofXmx6Ehf ZaG3CsR7684FTWNeIUJoRVTiz0it3ilSem5lDIkIYt5AkzCH2aaGRLkr7B+PbUWICp skiCnZTtAWjy0s3a6cMbZfgY7S3RC5np5wZ4DQgo= Date: Tue, 15 Mar 2022 16:48:07 -0700 From: Andrew Morton To: Minchan Kim Cc: Charan Teja Kalla , surenb@google.com, vbabka@suse.cz, rientjes@google.com, sfr@canb.auug.org.au, edgararriaga@google.com, nadav.amit@gmail.com, mhocko@suse.com, linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, "# 5 . 10+" Subject: Re: [PATCH V2,2/2] mm: madvise: skip unmapped vma holes passed to process_madvise Message-Id: <20220315164807.7a9cf1694ee2db8709a8597c@linux-foundation.org> In-Reply-To: References: <4f091776142f2ebf7b94018146de72318474e686.1647008754.git.quic_charante@quicinc.com> X-Mailer: Sylpheed 3.7.0 (GTK+ 2.24.33; x86_64-redhat-linux-gnu) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Rspamd-Server: rspam11 X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 0AE04C0015 Authentication-Results: imf28.hostedemail.com; dkim=pass header.d=linux-foundation.org header.s=korg header.b=nyfrMxNi; spf=pass (imf28.hostedemail.com: domain of akpm@linux-foundation.org designates 139.178.84.217 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=akpm@linux-foundation.org; dmarc=none X-Rspam-User: X-Stat-Signature: u7kd8ugomjhokcwnscu8opz5auryma15 X-HE-Tag: 1647388089-158667 X-Bogosity: Ham, tests=bogofilter, spamicity=0.000000, version=1.2.4 Sender: owner-linux-mm@kvack.org Precedence: bulk X-Loop: owner-majordomo@kvack.org List-ID: On Tue, 15 Mar 2022 15:58:28 -0700 Minchan Kim wrote: > On Fri, Mar 11, 2022 at 08:59:06PM +0530, Charan Teja Kalla wrote: > > The process_madvise() system call is expected to skip holes in vma > > passed through 'struct iovec' vector list. But do_madvise, which > > process_madvise() calls for each vma, returns ENOMEM in case of unmapped > > holes, despite the VMA is processed. > > Thus process_madvise() should treat ENOMEM as expected and consider the > > VMA passed to as processed and continue processing other vma's in the > > vector list. Returning -ENOMEM to user, despite the VMA is processed, > > will be unable to figure out where to start the next madvise. > > Fixes: ecb8ac8b1f14("mm/madvise: introduce process_madvise() syscall: an external memory hinting API") > > Cc: # 5.10+ > > Hmm, not sure whether it's stable material since it changes semantic of > API. It would be better to change the semantic from 5.19 with man page > update to specify the change. It's a very desirable change and it makes the code match the manpage and it's cc:stable. I think we should just absorb any transitory damage which this causes people. I doubt if there will be much - if anyone was affected by this they would have already told us that it's broken?