From: Oscar Salvador <osalvador@suse.de>
To: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@linux.intel.com>,
"Huang, Ying" <ying.huang@intel.com>,
Abhishek Goel <huntbag@linux.vnet.ibm.com>,
Baolin Wang <baolin.wang@linux.alibaba.com>,
linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
Oscar Salvador <osalvador@suse.de>
Subject: [PATCH v3] mm: Only re-generate demotion targets when a numa node changes its N_CPU state
Date: Mon, 14 Mar 2022 16:09:45 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20220314150945.12694-1-osalvador@suse.de> (raw)
Abhishek reported that after patch [1], hotplug operations are
taking ~double the expected time. [2]
The reason behind is that the CPU callbacks that migrate_on_reclaim_init()
sets always call set_migration_target_nodes() whenever a CPU is brought
up/down.
But we only care about numa nodes going from having cpus to become
cpuless, and vice versa, as that influences the demotion_target order.
We do already have two CPU callbacks (vmstat_cpu_online() and vmstat_cpu_dead())
that check exactly that, so get rid of the CPU callbacks in
migrate_on_reclaim_init() and only call set_migration_target_nodes() from
vmstat_cpu_{dead,online}() whenever a numa node change its N_CPU state.
[1] https://lore.kernel.org/linux-mm/20210721063926.3024591-2-ying.huang@intel.com/
[2] https://lore.kernel.org/linux-mm/eb438ddd-2919-73d4-bd9f-b7eecdd9577a@linux.vnet.ibm.com/
Fixes: 884a6e5d1f93b ("mm/migrate: update node demotion order on hotplug events")
Reviewed-by: Baolin Wang <baolin.wang@linux.alibaba.com>
Tested-by: Baolin Wang <baolin.wang@linux.alibaba.com>
Reported-by: Abhishek Goel <huntbag@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: Oscar Salvador <osalvador@suse.de>
---
v2 -> v3:
- Add feedback from Huang Ying
- Add tags
v1 -> v2:
- Add fedback from Huang Ying
- Add feedback from Baolin Wang
---
include/linux/migrate.h | 8 +++++++
mm/migrate.c | 47 +++++++++--------------------------------
mm/vmstat.c | 13 +++++++++++-
3 files changed, 30 insertions(+), 38 deletions(-)
diff --git a/include/linux/migrate.h b/include/linux/migrate.h
index db96e10eb8da..90e75d5a54d6 100644
--- a/include/linux/migrate.h
+++ b/include/linux/migrate.h
@@ -48,7 +48,15 @@ int folio_migrate_mapping(struct address_space *mapping,
struct folio *newfolio, struct folio *folio, int extra_count);
extern bool numa_demotion_enabled;
+extern void migrate_on_reclaim_init(void);
+#ifdef CONFIG_HOTPLUG_CPU
+extern void set_migration_target_nodes(void);
#else
+static inline void set_migration_target_nodes(void) {}
+#endif
+#else
+
+static inline void set_migration_target_nodes(void) {}
static inline void putback_movable_pages(struct list_head *l) {}
static inline int migrate_pages(struct list_head *l, new_page_t new,
diff --git a/mm/migrate.c b/mm/migrate.c
index e8a6933af68d..2561881f03b2 100644
--- a/mm/migrate.c
+++ b/mm/migrate.c
@@ -3193,7 +3193,7 @@ static void __set_migration_target_nodes(void)
/*
* For callers that do not hold get_online_mems() already.
*/
-static void set_migration_target_nodes(void)
+void set_migration_target_nodes(void)
{
get_online_mems();
__set_migration_target_nodes();
@@ -3257,51 +3257,24 @@ static int __meminit migrate_on_reclaim_callback(struct notifier_block *self,
return notifier_from_errno(0);
}
-/*
- * React to hotplug events that might affect the migration targets
- * like events that online or offline NUMA nodes.
- *
- * The ordering is also currently dependent on which nodes have
- * CPUs. That means we need CPU on/offline notification too.
- */
-static int migration_online_cpu(unsigned int cpu)
-{
- set_migration_target_nodes();
- return 0;
-}
-
-static int migration_offline_cpu(unsigned int cpu)
+void __init migrate_on_reclaim_init(void)
{
- set_migration_target_nodes();
- return 0;
-}
-
-static int __init migrate_on_reclaim_init(void)
-{
- int ret;
-
node_demotion = kmalloc_array(nr_node_ids,
sizeof(struct demotion_nodes),
GFP_KERNEL);
WARN_ON(!node_demotion);
- ret = cpuhp_setup_state_nocalls(CPUHP_MM_DEMOTION_DEAD, "mm/demotion:offline",
- NULL, migration_offline_cpu);
+ hotplug_memory_notifier(migrate_on_reclaim_callback, 100);
/*
- * In the unlikely case that this fails, the automatic
- * migration targets may become suboptimal for nodes
- * where N_CPU changes. With such a small impact in a
- * rare case, do not bother trying to do anything special.
+ * At this point, all numa nodes with memory/CPus have their state
+ * properly set, so we can build the demotion order now.
+ * Let us hold the cpu_hotplug lock just, as we could possibily have
+ * CPU hotplug events during boot.
*/
- WARN_ON(ret < 0);
- ret = cpuhp_setup_state(CPUHP_AP_MM_DEMOTION_ONLINE, "mm/demotion:online",
- migration_online_cpu, NULL);
- WARN_ON(ret < 0);
-
- hotplug_memory_notifier(migrate_on_reclaim_callback, 100);
- return 0;
+ cpus_read_lock();
+ set_migration_target_nodes();
+ cpus_read_unlock();
}
-late_initcall(migrate_on_reclaim_init);
#endif /* CONFIG_HOTPLUG_CPU */
bool numa_demotion_enabled = false;
diff --git a/mm/vmstat.c b/mm/vmstat.c
index 4057372745d0..9e9536df51b5 100644
--- a/mm/vmstat.c
+++ b/mm/vmstat.c
@@ -28,6 +28,7 @@
#include <linux/mm_inline.h>
#include <linux/page_ext.h>
#include <linux/page_owner.h>
+#include <linux/migrate.h>
#include "internal.h"
@@ -2043,7 +2044,12 @@ static void __init init_cpu_node_state(void)
static int vmstat_cpu_online(unsigned int cpu)
{
refresh_zone_stat_thresholds();
- node_set_state(cpu_to_node(cpu), N_CPU);
+
+ if (!node_state(cpu_to_node(cpu), N_CPU)) {
+ node_set_state(cpu_to_node(cpu), N_CPU);
+ set_migration_target_nodes();
+ }
+
return 0;
}
@@ -2066,6 +2072,8 @@ static int vmstat_cpu_dead(unsigned int cpu)
return 0;
node_clear_state(node, N_CPU);
+ set_migration_target_nodes();
+
return 0;
}
@@ -2097,6 +2105,9 @@ void __init init_mm_internals(void)
start_shepherd_timer();
#endif
+#if defined(CONFIG_MIGRATION) && defined(CONFIG_HOTPLUG_CPU)
+ migrate_on_reclaim_init();
+#endif
#ifdef CONFIG_PROC_FS
proc_create_seq("buddyinfo", 0444, NULL, &fragmentation_op);
proc_create_seq("pagetypeinfo", 0400, NULL, &pagetypeinfo_op);
--
2.34.1
next reply other threads:[~2022-03-14 15:09 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2022-03-14 15:09 Oscar Salvador [this message]
2022-03-15 6:40 ` Huang, Ying
2022-03-15 8:32 ` Oscar Salvador
2022-03-15 9:19 ` Huang, Ying
2022-03-16 14:03 ` Abhishek Goel
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20220314150945.12694-1-osalvador@suse.de \
--to=osalvador@suse.de \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=baolin.wang@linux.alibaba.com \
--cc=dave.hansen@linux.intel.com \
--cc=huntbag@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=ying.huang@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox