From: Wei Yang <richard.weiyang@gmail.com>
To: hannes@cmpxchg.org, mhocko@kernel.org, vdavydov.dev@gmail.com,
akpm@linux-foundation.org
Cc: cgroups@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org,
Wei Yang <richard.weiyang@gmail.com>
Subject: [Patch v2 3/3] mm/memcg: add next_mz back to soft limit tree if not reclaimed yet
Date: Sat, 12 Mar 2022 07:16:23 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20220312071623.19050-3-richard.weiyang@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20220312071623.19050-1-richard.weiyang@gmail.com>
When memory reclaim failed for a maximum number of attempts and we bail
out of the reclaim loop, we forgot to put the target mem_cgroup chosen
for next reclaim back to the soft limit tree. This prevented pages in
the mem_cgroup from being reclaimed in the future even though the
mem_cgroup exceeded its soft limit.
Let's say there are two mem_cgroup and both of them exceed the soft
limit, while the first one is more active then the second. Since we add
a mem_cgroup to soft limit tree every 1024 event, the second one just
get a rare chance to be put on soft limit tree even it exceeds the
limit.
As time goes on, the first mem_cgroup was kept close to its soft limit
due to reclaim activities, while the memory usage of the second
mem_cgroup keeps growing over the soft limit for a long time due to its
relatively rare occurrence.
This patch adds next_mz back to prevent this sceanrio.
Signed-off-by: Wei Yang <richard.weiyang@gmail.com>
---
mm/memcontrol.c | 7 ++++++-
1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/mm/memcontrol.c b/mm/memcontrol.c
index 344a7e891bc5..e803ff02aae2 100644
--- a/mm/memcontrol.c
+++ b/mm/memcontrol.c
@@ -3493,8 +3493,13 @@ unsigned long mem_cgroup_soft_limit_reclaim(pg_data_t *pgdat, int order,
loop > MEM_CGROUP_MAX_SOFT_LIMIT_RECLAIM_LOOPS))
break;
} while (!nr_reclaimed);
- if (next_mz)
+ if (next_mz) {
+ spin_lock_irq(&mctz->lock);
+ excess = soft_limit_excess(next_mz->memcg);
+ __mem_cgroup_insert_exceeded(next_mz, mctz, excess);
+ spin_unlock_irq(&mctz->lock);
css_put(&next_mz->memcg->css);
+ }
return nr_reclaimed;
}
--
2.33.1
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2022-03-12 7:16 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2022-03-12 7:16 [Patch v2 1/3] mm/memcg: mz already removed from rb_tree in mem_cgroup_largest_soft_limit_node() Wei Yang
2022-03-12 7:16 ` [Patch v2 2/3] mm/memcg: __mem_cgroup_remove_exceeded could handle a !on-tree mz properly Wei Yang
2022-03-14 9:54 ` Michal Hocko
2022-03-14 22:51 ` Wei Yang
2022-03-15 8:52 ` Michal Hocko
2022-03-15 23:54 ` Wei Yang
2022-03-12 7:16 ` Wei Yang [this message]
2022-03-14 9:41 ` [Patch v2 3/3] mm/memcg: add next_mz back to soft limit tree if not reclaimed yet Michal Hocko
2022-03-14 23:05 ` Wei Yang
2022-03-15 8:54 ` Michal Hocko
2022-03-14 9:51 ` [Patch v2 1/3] mm/memcg: mz already removed from rb_tree in mem_cgroup_largest_soft_limit_node() Michal Hocko
2022-03-14 23:21 ` Wei Yang
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20220312071623.19050-3-richard.weiyang@gmail.com \
--to=richard.weiyang@gmail.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=cgroups@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=hannes@cmpxchg.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=mhocko@kernel.org \
--cc=vdavydov.dev@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox