linux-mm.kvack.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
To: Oscar Salvador <osalvador@suse.de>
Cc: Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@linux.intel.com>,
	"Huang, Ying" <ying.huang@intel.com>,
	Abhishek Goel <huntbag@linux.vnet.ibm.com>,
	Baolin Wang <baolin.wang@linux.alibaba.com>,
	linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] mm: Only re-generate demotion targets when a numa node changes its N_CPU state
Date: Thu, 10 Mar 2022 18:39:51 -0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20220310183951.cb713c6ae926ea6ea8489a71@linux-foundation.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20220310120749.23077-1-osalvador@suse.de>

On Thu, 10 Mar 2022 13:07:49 +0100 Oscar Salvador <osalvador@suse.de> wrote:

> Abhishek reported that after patch [1], hotplug operations are
> taking ~double the expected time. [2]
> 
> The reason behind is that the CPU callbacks that migrate_on_reclaim_init()
> sets always call set_migration_target_nodes() whenever a CPU is brought
> up/down.
> But we only care about numa nodes going from having cpus to become
> cpuless, and vice versa, as that influences the demotion_target order.
> 
> We do already have two CPU callbacks (vmstat_cpu_online() and vmstat_cpu_dead())
> that check exactly that, so get rid of the CPU callbacks in
> migrate_on_reclaim_init() and only call set_migration_target_nodes() from
> vmstat_cpu_{dead,online}() whenever a numa node change its N_CPU state.

What I'm not getting here (as so often happens) is a sense of how badly
this affects our users.  Does anyone actually hotplug frequently enough
to care?

If "yes" then I'm inclined to merge this up for 5.18 with a cc:stable. 
Not for 5.17 because it's late and things are looking rather creaky
already.

And I'll add a

Fixes: 884a6e5d1f93b ("mm/migrate: update node demotion order on hotplug events")

which is that patch's fourth such bouquet.


  parent reply	other threads:[~2022-03-11  2:39 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2022-03-10 12:07 Oscar Salvador
2022-03-11  1:33 ` Baolin Wang
2022-03-11  2:24 ` Huang, Ying
2022-03-11  8:39   ` Oscar Salvador
2022-03-14  1:03     ` Huang, Ying
2022-03-14 15:13       ` Oscar Salvador
2022-03-14 15:20         ` Dave Hansen
2022-03-15  6:13           ` Oscar Salvador
2022-03-15  6:31             ` Huang, Ying
2022-03-11  2:39 ` Andrew Morton [this message]
2022-03-11  9:23   ` Oscar Salvador
2022-03-11 17:10   ` Dave Hansen
2022-03-14  9:09     ` Abhishek Goel
2022-03-11  5:06 ` Huang, Ying
2022-03-11  9:17   ` Oscar Salvador
2022-03-14  3:09     ` Huang, Ying

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20220310183951.cb713c6ae926ea6ea8489a71@linux-foundation.org \
    --to=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=baolin.wang@linux.alibaba.com \
    --cc=dave.hansen@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=huntbag@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
    --cc=osalvador@suse.de \
    --cc=ying.huang@intel.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox