linux-mm.kvack.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Bharata B Rao <bharata@amd.com>
To: <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Cc: <linux-mm@kvack.org>, <x86@kernel.org>,
	<kirill.shutemov@linux.intel.com>, <tglx@linutronix.de>,
	<mingo@redhat.com>, <bp@alien8.de>, <dave.hansen@linux.intel.com>,
	<catalin.marinas@arm.com>, <will@kernel.org>, <shuah@kernel.org>,
	<oleg@redhat.com>, <ananth.narayan@amd.com>,
	"Bharata B Rao" <bharata@amd.com>
Subject: [RFC PATCH v0 5/6] x86: Untag user pointers in access_ok()
Date: Thu, 10 Mar 2022 16:45:44 +0530	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20220310111545.10852-6-bharata@amd.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20220310111545.10852-1-bharata@amd.com>

This is a preparatory work to allow passing of tagged user
pointers (with a top few bits other than zeroes) as syscall
arguments.

Since user can provide tagged pointer to syscalls they need
to be untagged before validating them in access_ok().
Untagging is done only if flag TIF_TAGGED_ADDR is set for
the thread. This is set via prctl() option which will be
introduced in a subsequent patch.

get_user() and put_user() don't use access_ok(), but check
access against TASK_SIZE direcly in assembly. Strip tags,
before calling into the assembly helper.

[kirill.shutemov@linux.intel.com - get/put_user() changes]

Signed-off-by: Bharata B Rao <bharata@amd.com>
---
 arch/x86/include/asm/thread_info.h |  2 ++
 arch/x86/include/asm/uaccess.h     | 28 +++++++++++++++++++++-------
 2 files changed, 23 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)

diff --git a/arch/x86/include/asm/thread_info.h b/arch/x86/include/asm/thread_info.h
index ebec69c35e95..c786103a5325 100644
--- a/arch/x86/include/asm/thread_info.h
+++ b/arch/x86/include/asm/thread_info.h
@@ -101,6 +101,7 @@ struct thread_info {
 #define TIF_BLOCKSTEP		25	/* set when we want DEBUGCTLMSR_BTF */
 #define TIF_LAZY_MMU_UPDATES	27	/* task is updating the mmu lazily */
 #define TIF_ADDR32		29	/* 32-bit address space on 64 bits */
+#define TIF_TAGGED_ADDR		30	/* Allow tagged user addresses */
 
 #define _TIF_NOTIFY_RESUME	(1 << TIF_NOTIFY_RESUME)
 #define _TIF_SIGPENDING		(1 << TIF_SIGPENDING)
@@ -124,6 +125,7 @@ struct thread_info {
 #define _TIF_BLOCKSTEP		(1 << TIF_BLOCKSTEP)
 #define _TIF_LAZY_MMU_UPDATES	(1 << TIF_LAZY_MMU_UPDATES)
 #define _TIF_ADDR32		(1 << TIF_ADDR32)
+#define _TIF_TAGGED_ADDR	(1 << TIF_TAGGED_ADDR)
 
 /* flags to check in __switch_to() */
 #define _TIF_WORK_CTXSW_BASE					\
diff --git a/arch/x86/include/asm/uaccess.h b/arch/x86/include/asm/uaccess.h
index ac96f9b2d64b..feb2e21c7e09 100644
--- a/arch/x86/include/asm/uaccess.h
+++ b/arch/x86/include/asm/uaccess.h
@@ -35,11 +35,15 @@ static inline bool __chk_range_not_ok(unsigned long addr, unsigned long size, un
 	return unlikely(addr > limit);
 }
 
-#define __range_not_ok(addr, size, limit)				\
-({									\
-	__chk_user_ptr(addr);						\
-	__chk_range_not_ok((unsigned long __force)(addr), size, limit); \
-})
+static inline bool __range_not_ok(const void __user *addr, unsigned long size,
+				  unsigned long limit)
+{
+	if (test_thread_flag(TIF_TAGGED_ADDR))
+		addr = untagged_addr(addr);
+
+	__chk_user_ptr(addr);
+	return __chk_range_not_ok((unsigned long __force)(addr), size, limit);
+}
 
 #ifdef CONFIG_DEBUG_ATOMIC_SLEEP
 static inline bool pagefault_disabled(void);
@@ -152,7 +156,12 @@ extern int __get_user_bad(void);
  * Return: zero on success, or -EFAULT on error.
  * On error, the variable @x is set to zero.
  */
-#define get_user(x,ptr) ({ might_fault(); do_get_user_call(get_user,x,ptr); })
+#define get_user(x,ptr)							\
+({									\
+	__typeof__(*(ptr)) *ptr_untagged = untagged_ptr(ptr);		\
+	might_fault();							\
+	do_get_user_call(get_user,x,ptr_untagged);			\
+})
 
 /**
  * __get_user - Get a simple variable from user space, with less checking.
@@ -249,7 +258,12 @@ extern void __put_user_nocheck_8(void);
  *
  * Return: zero on success, or -EFAULT on error.
  */
-#define put_user(x, ptr) ({ might_fault(); do_put_user_call(put_user,x,ptr); })
+#define put_user(x, ptr)						\
+({									\
+	__typeof__(*(ptr)) *ptr_untagged = untagged_ptr(ptr);		\
+	might_fault();							\
+	do_put_user_call(put_user,x,ptr_untagged);			\
+})
 
 /**
  * __put_user - Write a simple value into user space, with less checking.
-- 
2.25.1



  parent reply	other threads:[~2022-03-10 11:16 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 33+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2022-03-10 11:15 [RFC PATCH v0 0/6] x86/AMD: Userspace address tagging Bharata B Rao
2022-03-10 11:15 ` [RFC PATCH v0 1/6] mm, arm64: Update PR_SET/GET_TAGGED_ADDR_CTRL interface Bharata B Rao
2022-03-10 11:15 ` [RFC PATCH v0 2/6] x86/cpufeatures: Add Upper Address Ignore(UAI) as CPU feature Bharata B Rao
2022-03-10 11:15 ` [RFC PATCH v0 3/6] x86: Enable Upper Address Ignore(UAI) feature Bharata B Rao
2022-03-10 19:46   ` Andrew Cooper
2022-03-10 22:37     ` David Laight
2022-03-10 22:46       ` Dave Hansen
2022-03-11 12:37   ` Boris Petkov
2022-03-10 11:15 ` [RFC PATCH v0 4/6] x86: Provide an implementation of untagged_addr() Bharata B Rao
2022-03-10 11:15 ` Bharata B Rao [this message]
2022-03-10 11:15 ` [RFC PATCH v0 6/6] x86: Add prctl() options to control tagged user addresses ABI Bharata B Rao
2022-03-10 14:32 ` [RFC PATCH v0 0/6] x86/AMD: Userspace address tagging David Laight
2022-03-10 16:45   ` Dave Hansen
2022-03-10 17:19     ` David Laight
2022-03-11  5:42       ` Bharata B Rao
2022-03-11  8:15         ` David Laight
2022-03-11  9:11           ` Bharata B Rao
2022-03-11  9:36             ` David Laight
2022-03-11 16:51               ` Dave Hansen
2022-03-10 15:16 ` Dave Hansen
2022-03-10 15:22   ` Dave Hansen
2022-03-14  5:00   ` Bharata B Rao
2022-03-14  7:03     ` Dave Hansen
2022-03-21 22:29 ` Andy Lutomirski
2022-03-21 22:59   ` Thomas Gleixner
2022-03-22  5:31   ` David Laight
2022-03-23  7:48   ` Bharata B Rao
2022-04-01 19:25     ` Dave Hansen
2022-04-05  5:58       ` Bharata B Rao
2022-04-01 19:41     ` Andy Lutomirski
2022-04-05  8:14     ` Peter Zijlstra
2022-04-05  8:40       ` Bharata B Rao
2022-04-08 17:41   ` Catalin Marinas

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20220310111545.10852-6-bharata@amd.com \
    --to=bharata@amd.com \
    --cc=ananth.narayan@amd.com \
    --cc=bp@alien8.de \
    --cc=catalin.marinas@arm.com \
    --cc=dave.hansen@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=kirill.shutemov@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
    --cc=mingo@redhat.com \
    --cc=oleg@redhat.com \
    --cc=shuah@kernel.org \
    --cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
    --cc=will@kernel.org \
    --cc=x86@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox