[PATCH 2/2] mm: slub: Delete useless parameter of alloc_slab_page()

[sxwjean@me.com]

From: Xiongwei Song <sxwjean@gmail.com>

The parameter @s is useless for alloc_slab_page(), let's delete it.

Signed-off-by: Xiongwei Song <sxwjean@gmail.com>
---
 mm/slub.c | 8 ++++----
 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)

diff --git a/mm/slub.c b/mm/slub.c
index 261474092e43..5d273ee04c43 100644
--- a/mm/slub.c
+++ b/mm/slub.c
@@ -1788,8 +1788,8 @@ static void *setup_object(struct kmem_cache *s, struct slab *slab,
 /*
  * Slab allocation and freeing
  */
-static inline struct slab *alloc_slab_page(struct kmem_cache *s,
-		gfp_t flags, int node, struct kmem_cache_order_objects oo)
+static inline struct slab *alloc_slab_page(gfp_t flags, int node,
+		struct kmem_cache_order_objects oo)
 {
 	struct folio *folio;
 	struct slab *slab;
@@ -1941,7 +1941,7 @@ static struct slab *allocate_slab(struct kmem_cache *s, gfp_t flags, int node)
 	if ((alloc_gfp & __GFP_DIRECT_RECLAIM) && oo_order(oo) > oo_order(s->min))
 		alloc_gfp = (alloc_gfp | __GFP_NOMEMALLOC) & ~(__GFP_RECLAIM|__GFP_NOFAIL);
 
-	slab = alloc_slab_page(s, alloc_gfp, node, oo);
+	slab = alloc_slab_page(alloc_gfp, node, oo);
 	if (unlikely(!slab)) {
 		oo = s->min;
 		alloc_gfp = flags;
@@ -1949,7 +1949,7 @@ static struct slab *allocate_slab(struct kmem_cache *s, gfp_t flags, int node)
 		 * Allocation may have failed due to fragmentation.
 		 * Try a lower order alloc if possible
 		 */
-		slab = alloc_slab_page(s, alloc_gfp, node, oo);
+		slab = alloc_slab_page(alloc_gfp, node, oo);
 		if (unlikely(!slab))
 			goto out;
 		stat(s, ORDER_FALLBACK);
-- 
2.30.2