From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from kanga.kvack.org (kanga.kvack.org [205.233.56.17]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 02A76C433FE for ; Sun, 27 Feb 2022 14:05:41 +0000 (UTC) Received: by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix) id 24AA98D0002; Sun, 27 Feb 2022 09:05:41 -0500 (EST) Received: by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix, from userid 40) id 1F9BD8D0001; Sun, 27 Feb 2022 09:05:41 -0500 (EST) X-Delivered-To: int-list-linux-mm@kvack.org Received: by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix, from userid 63042) id 10F808D0002; Sun, 27 Feb 2022 09:05:41 -0500 (EST) X-Delivered-To: linux-mm@kvack.org Received: from relay.hostedemail.com (relay.hostedemail.com [64.99.140.26]) by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 035618D0001 for ; Sun, 27 Feb 2022 09:05:41 -0500 (EST) Received: from smtpin09.hostedemail.com (a10.router.float.18 [10.200.18.1]) by unirelay10.hostedemail.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id CE259477 for ; Sun, 27 Feb 2022 14:05:40 +0000 (UTC) X-FDA: 79188732840.09.21FC415 Received: from mga12.intel.com (mga12.intel.com [192.55.52.136]) by imf02.hostedemail.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8D8B18000D for ; Sun, 27 Feb 2022 14:05:39 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=intel.com; i=@intel.com; q=dns/txt; s=Intel; t=1645970739; x=1677506739; h=date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references: mime-version:in-reply-to; bh=7Na9jV/JaJdKSHTdHA9OjHjzc4QU+Y7l02g7Nwi+qMM=; b=N7HicYG2UmlMgpKOrMt9aaRIps9ti1tudI3FQRbNHJNqOfy7f9as3ed1 rFcQkG37me+Mz9Dl3XfCx9jXSiEEQtmaDtByj5Iw9B1YmyB5FrpaJ+LnM OB3uFbhDT24KKYrNfjavZsrOdlJTh6hYGxs2zDjViF8vOqYipemWcyu/y HjCcMjRagV9q1sDUUW6vl45wGDQgBJVHVn2jZFEX7gWzzwe2ijJ/hln8U a8l5ZH5pOHURUj6qPQIqIu5UVaMPlWgb3CsYiB9U4yRlnRs39+U/Fk0lR bg7BiCbrqOFTCYaS5dFLWCKGPQMrxcTJSFx9fSt29j/6ZnPZjHxlKehMn A==; X-IronPort-AV: E=McAfee;i="6200,9189,10270"; a="232710444" X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.90,141,1643702400"; d="scan'208";a="232710444" Received: from orsmga005.jf.intel.com ([10.7.209.41]) by fmsmga106.fm.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 27 Feb 2022 06:05:38 -0800 X-ExtLoop1: 1 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.90,141,1643702400"; d="scan'208";a="708357100" Received: from lkp-server01.sh.intel.com (HELO 788b1cd46f0d) ([10.239.97.150]) by orsmga005.jf.intel.com with ESMTP; 27 Feb 2022 06:05:34 -0800 Received: from kbuild by 788b1cd46f0d with local (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1nOKB3-0006Xh-VQ; Sun, 27 Feb 2022 14:05:33 +0000 Date: Sun, 27 Feb 2022 22:05:14 +0800 From: kernel test robot To: Shiyang Ruan , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org, nvdimm@lists.linux.dev, linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org Cc: kbuild-all@lists.01.org, djwong@kernel.org, dan.j.williams@intel.com, david@fromorbit.com, hch@infradead.org, jane.chu@oracle.com Subject: Re: [PATCH v11 7/8] xfs: Implement ->notify_failure() for XFS Message-ID: <202202272203.U7VlQY3B-lkp@intel.com> References: <20220227120747.711169-8-ruansy.fnst@fujitsu.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20220227120747.711169-8-ruansy.fnst@fujitsu.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.10.1 (2018-07-13) X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 8D8B18000D X-Stat-Signature: kjqdio6jiekj5mbieh65txw6395tod83 X-Rspam-User: Authentication-Results: imf02.hostedemail.com; dkim=pass header.d=intel.com header.s=Intel header.b=N7HicYG2; spf=none (imf02.hostedemail.com: domain of lkp@intel.com has no SPF policy when checking 192.55.52.136) smtp.mailfrom=lkp@intel.com; dmarc=pass (policy=none) header.from=intel.com X-Rspamd-Server: rspam07 X-HE-Tag: 1645970739-89005 X-Bogosity: Ham, tests=bogofilter, spamicity=0.000000, version=1.2.4 Sender: owner-linux-mm@kvack.org Precedence: bulk X-Loop: owner-majordomo@kvack.org List-ID: Hi Shiyang, Thank you for the patch! Yet something to improve: [auto build test ERROR on xfs-linux/for-next] [also build test ERROR on linux/master] [cannot apply to hnaz-mm/master linus/master v5.17-rc5 next-20220225] [If your patch is applied to the wrong git tree, kindly drop us a note. And when submitting patch, we suggest to use '--base' as documented in https://git-scm.com/docs/git-format-patch] url: https://github.com/0day-ci/linux/commits/Shiyang-Ruan/fsdax-introduce-fs-query-to-support-reflink/20220227-200849 base: https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/fs/xfs/xfs-linux.git for-next config: i386-randconfig-a003 (https://download.01.org/0day-ci/archive/20220227/202202272203.U7VlQY3B-lkp@intel.com/config) compiler: gcc-9 (Debian 9.3.0-22) 9.3.0 reproduce (this is a W=1 build): # https://github.com/0day-ci/linux/commit/9f4bfbd2bae60e9f172e0b7332b2af32aa5baa87 git remote add linux-review https://github.com/0day-ci/linux git fetch --no-tags linux-review Shiyang-Ruan/fsdax-introduce-fs-query-to-support-reflink/20220227-200849 git checkout 9f4bfbd2bae60e9f172e0b7332b2af32aa5baa87 # save the config file to linux build tree mkdir build_dir make W=1 O=build_dir ARCH=i386 SHELL=/bin/bash If you fix the issue, kindly add following tag as appropriate Reported-by: kernel test robot All errors (new ones prefixed by >>): ld: fs/xfs/xfs_buf.o: in function `xfs_free_buftarg': >> fs/xfs/xfs_buf.c:1897: undefined reference to `dax_unregister_holder' ld: fs/xfs/xfs_notify_failure.o: in function `xfs_dax_notify_failure': >> fs/xfs/xfs_notify_failure.c:187: undefined reference to `dax_holder' vim +1897 fs/xfs/xfs_buf.c 1885 1886 void 1887 xfs_free_buftarg( 1888 struct xfs_buftarg *btp) 1889 { 1890 unregister_shrinker(&btp->bt_shrinker); 1891 ASSERT(percpu_counter_sum(&btp->bt_io_count) == 0); 1892 percpu_counter_destroy(&btp->bt_io_count); 1893 list_lru_destroy(&btp->bt_lru); 1894 1895 blkdev_issue_flush(btp->bt_bdev); 1896 if (btp->bt_daxdev) > 1897 dax_unregister_holder(btp->bt_daxdev, btp->bt_mount); 1898 fs_put_dax(btp->bt_daxdev); 1899 1900 kmem_free(btp); 1901 } 1902 --- 0-DAY CI Kernel Test Service, Intel Corporation https://lists.01.org/hyperkitty/list/kbuild-all@lists.01.org