From: SeongJae Park <sj@kernel.org>
To: Jonghyeon Kim <tome01@ajou.ac.kr>
Cc: akpm@linux-foundation.org, Jonathan.Cameron@Huawei.com,
amit@kernel.org, benh@kernel.crashing.org, corbet@lwn.net,
david@redhat.com, dwmw@amazon.com, elver@google.com,
foersleo@amazon.de, gthelen@google.com, markubo@amazon.de,
rientjes@google.com, shakeelb@google.com, shuah@kernel.org,
linux-damon@amazon.com, linux-mm@kvack.org,
linux-doc@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH v1 2/3] mm/damon/core: Add damon_start_one()
Date: Tue, 22 Feb 2022 09:53:28 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20220222095328.7962-1-sj@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20220218102611.31895-3-tome01@ajou.ac.kr>
Hello Jonghyeon,
On Fri, 18 Feb 2022 19:26:10 +0900 Jonghyeon Kim <tome01@ajou.ac.kr> wrote:
> damon_start() function is designed to start multiple damon monitoring
> contexts. But, sometimes we need to start monitoring one context.
> Although __damon_start() could be considered to start for one monitoring
> context, it seems reasonable to adopt a new function that does not need
> to handle 'damon_lock' from the caller.
>
> Signed-off-by: Jonghyeon Kim <tome01@ajou.ac.kr>
> ---
> include/linux/damon.h | 1 +
> mm/damon/core.c | 25 +++++++++++++++++++++++++
> 2 files changed, 26 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/include/linux/damon.h b/include/linux/damon.h
> index c0adf1566603..069577477662 100644
> --- a/include/linux/damon.h
> +++ b/include/linux/damon.h
> @@ -511,6 +511,7 @@ int damon_register_ops(struct damon_operations *ops);
> int damon_select_ops(struct damon_ctx *ctx, enum damon_ops_id id);
>
> int damon_start(struct damon_ctx **ctxs, int nr_ctxs);
> +int damon_start_one(struct damon_ctx *ctx);
> int damon_stop(struct damon_ctx **ctxs, int nr_ctxs);
>
> #endif /* CONFIG_DAMON */
> diff --git a/mm/damon/core.c b/mm/damon/core.c
> index 290c9c0535ee..e43f138a3489 100644
> --- a/mm/damon/core.c
> +++ b/mm/damon/core.c
> @@ -466,6 +466,31 @@ int damon_start(struct damon_ctx **ctxs, int nr_ctxs)
> return err;
> }
>
> +/**
> + * damon_start_one() - Starts the monitorings for one context.
> + * @ctx: monitoring context
> + *
> + * This function starts one monitoring thread for only one monitoring context
> + * handling damon_lock.
> + *
> + * Return: 0 on success, negative error code otherwise.
> + */
> +int damon_start_one(struct damon_ctx *ctx)
> +{
> + int err = 0;
> +
> + mutex_lock(&damon_lock);
> + err = __damon_start(ctx);
> + if (err) {
> + mutex_unlock(&damon_lock);
> + return err;
> + }
> + nr_running_ctxs++;
> + mutex_unlock(&damon_lock);
> +
> + return err;
> +}
> +
IMHO, this looks like an unnecessary duplication of code. Unless this is
needed for a real usecase, this change might unnecessarily make the code only a
little bit more complicated. And to my understanding of the next patch, this
is not really needed for this patchset. I will left comments on the patch. If
I'm missing something, please clarify why this is really needed.
Furthermore, damon_start() starts a set of DAMON contexts in exclusive manner,
to ensure there will be no interference. This patch breaks the assumption.
That is, contexts that started with damon_start() could be interfered by other
contexts that started with damon_start_one(). I have a plan to make
damon_start() also work for non-exclusive contexts group[1], though.
[1] https://lore.kernel.org/linux-mm/20220217161938.8874-3-sj@kernel.org/
Thanks,
SJ
> /*
> * __damon_stop() - Stops monitoring of given context.
> * @ctx: monitoring context
> --
> 2.17.1
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2022-02-22 9:53 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2022-02-18 10:26 [RFC PATCH v1 0/3] Rebase DAMON_RECALIM for NUMA system Jonghyeon Kim
2022-02-18 10:26 ` [RFC PATCH v1 1/3] mm/damon: Rebase damos watermarks for NUMA systems Jonghyeon Kim
2022-02-22 9:53 ` SeongJae Park
[not found] ` <20220223051056.GA3502@swarm08>
2022-02-23 7:10 ` Jonghyeon Kim
2022-02-18 10:26 ` [RFC PATCH v1 2/3] mm/damon/core: Add damon_start_one() Jonghyeon Kim
2022-02-22 9:53 ` SeongJae Park [this message]
[not found] ` <20220223051113.GA3535@swarm08>
2022-02-23 7:11 ` Jonghyeon Kim
2022-02-18 10:26 ` [RFC PATCH v1 3/3] mm/damon/reclaim: Add per NUMA node proactive reclamation by DAMON_RECLAIM Jonghyeon Kim
2022-02-22 9:53 ` SeongJae Park
[not found] ` <20220223051127.GA3588@swarm08>
2022-02-23 7:12 ` Jonghyeon Kim
2022-02-22 9:53 ` [RFC PATCH v1 0/3] Rebase DAMON_RECALIM for NUMA system SeongJae Park
[not found] ` <20220223051146.GA4530@swarm08>
2022-02-23 7:12 ` Jonghyeon Kim
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20220222095328.7962-1-sj@kernel.org \
--to=sj@kernel.org \
--cc=Jonathan.Cameron@Huawei.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=amit@kernel.org \
--cc=benh@kernel.crashing.org \
--cc=corbet@lwn.net \
--cc=david@redhat.com \
--cc=dwmw@amazon.com \
--cc=elver@google.com \
--cc=foersleo@amazon.de \
--cc=gthelen@google.com \
--cc=linux-damon@amazon.com \
--cc=linux-doc@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=markubo@amazon.de \
--cc=rientjes@google.com \
--cc=shakeelb@google.com \
--cc=shuah@kernel.org \
--cc=tome01@ajou.ac.kr \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox