From: Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@linutronix.de>
To: cgroups@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org
Cc: "Andrew Morton" <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
"Johannes Weiner" <hannes@cmpxchg.org>,
"Michal Hocko" <mhocko@kernel.org>,
"Michal Koutný" <mkoutny@suse.com>,
"Peter Zijlstra" <peterz@infradead.org>,
"Thomas Gleixner" <tglx@linutronix.de>,
"Vladimir Davydov" <vdavydov.dev@gmail.com>,
"Waiman Long" <longman@redhat.com>,
"Sebastian Andrzej Siewior" <bigeasy@linutronix.de>,
"Roman Gushchin" <guro@fb.com>
Subject: [PATCH v3 3/5] mm/memcg: Protect per-CPU counter by disabling preemption on PREEMPT_RT where needed.
Date: Thu, 17 Feb 2022 10:48:00 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20220217094802.3644569-4-bigeasy@linutronix.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20220217094802.3644569-1-bigeasy@linutronix.de>
The per-CPU counter are modified with the non-atomic modifier. The
consistency is ensured by disabling interrupts for the update.
On non PREEMPT_RT configuration this works because acquiring a
spinlock_t typed lock with the _irq() suffix disables interrupts. On
PREEMPT_RT configurations the RMW operation can be interrupted.
Another problem is that mem_cgroup_swapout() expects to be invoked with
disabled interrupts because the caller has to acquire a spinlock_t which
is acquired with disabled interrupts. Since spinlock_t never disables
interrupts on PREEMPT_RT the interrupts are never disabled at this
point.
The code is never called from in_irq() context on PREEMPT_RT therefore
disabling preemption during the update is sufficient on PREEMPT_RT.
The sections which explicitly disable interrupts can remain on
PREEMPT_RT because the sections remain short and they don't involve
sleeping locks (memcg_check_events() is doing nothing on PREEMPT_RT).
Disable preemption during update of the per-CPU variables which do not
explicitly disable interrupts.
Signed-off-by: Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@linutronix.de>
Acked-by: Roman Gushchin <guro@fb.com>
---
mm/memcontrol.c | 29 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-
1 file changed, 28 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/mm/memcontrol.c b/mm/memcontrol.c
index 0b5117ed2ae08..36ab3660f2c6d 100644
--- a/mm/memcontrol.c
+++ b/mm/memcontrol.c
@@ -630,6 +630,28 @@ static DEFINE_SPINLOCK(stats_flush_lock);
static DEFINE_PER_CPU(unsigned int, stats_updates);
static atomic_t stats_flush_threshold = ATOMIC_INIT(0);
+/*
+ * Accessors to ensure that preemption is disabled on PREEMPT_RT because it can
+ * not rely on this as part of an acquired spinlock_t lock. These functions are
+ * never used in hardirq context on PREEMPT_RT and therefore disabling preemtion
+ * is sufficient.
+ */
+static void memcg_stats_lock(void)
+{
+#ifdef CONFIG_PREEMPT_RT
+ preempt_disable();
+#else
+ VM_BUG_ON(!irqs_disabled());
+#endif
+}
+
+static void memcg_stats_unlock(void)
+{
+#ifdef CONFIG_PREEMPT_RT
+ preempt_enable();
+#endif
+}
+
static inline void memcg_rstat_updated(struct mem_cgroup *memcg, int val)
{
unsigned int x;
@@ -706,6 +728,7 @@ void __mod_memcg_lruvec_state(struct lruvec *lruvec, enum node_stat_item idx,
pn = container_of(lruvec, struct mem_cgroup_per_node, lruvec);
memcg = pn->memcg;
+ memcg_stats_lock();
/* Update memcg */
__this_cpu_add(memcg->vmstats_percpu->state[idx], val);
@@ -713,6 +736,7 @@ void __mod_memcg_lruvec_state(struct lruvec *lruvec, enum node_stat_item idx,
__this_cpu_add(pn->lruvec_stats_percpu->state[idx], val);
memcg_rstat_updated(memcg, val);
+ memcg_stats_unlock();
}
/**
@@ -795,8 +819,10 @@ void __count_memcg_events(struct mem_cgroup *memcg, enum vm_event_item idx,
if (mem_cgroup_disabled())
return;
+ memcg_stats_lock();
__this_cpu_add(memcg->vmstats_percpu->events[idx], count);
memcg_rstat_updated(memcg, count);
+ memcg_stats_unlock();
}
static unsigned long memcg_events(struct mem_cgroup *memcg, int event)
@@ -7140,8 +7166,9 @@ void mem_cgroup_swapout(struct page *page, swp_entry_t entry)
* important here to have the interrupts disabled because it is the
* only synchronisation we have for updating the per-CPU variables.
*/
- VM_BUG_ON(!irqs_disabled());
+ memcg_stats_lock();
mem_cgroup_charge_statistics(memcg, -nr_entries);
+ memcg_stats_unlock();
memcg_check_events(memcg, page_to_nid(page));
css_put(&memcg->css);
--
2.34.1
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2022-02-17 9:48 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 24+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2022-02-17 9:47 [PATCH v3 0/5] mm/memcg: Address PREEMPT_RT problems instead of disabling it Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
2022-02-17 9:47 ` [PATCH v3 1/5] mm/memcg: Revert ("mm/memcg: optimize user context object stock access") Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
2022-02-18 16:09 ` Shakeel Butt
2022-02-21 14:26 ` Michal Hocko
2022-02-17 9:47 ` [PATCH v3 2/5] mm/memcg: Disable threshold event handlers on PREEMPT_RT Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
2022-02-18 16:39 ` Shakeel Butt
2022-02-21 14:27 ` Michal Hocko
2022-02-17 9:48 ` Sebastian Andrzej Siewior [this message]
2022-02-18 17:25 ` [PATCH v3 3/5] mm/memcg: Protect per-CPU counter by disabling preemption on PREEMPT_RT where needed Shakeel Butt
2022-02-21 11:31 ` Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
2022-02-21 12:12 ` Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
2022-02-21 13:18 ` Michal Koutný
2022-02-21 13:58 ` Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
2022-02-17 9:48 ` [PATCH v3 4/5] mm/memcg: Opencode the inner part of obj_cgroup_uncharge_pages() in drain_obj_stock() Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
2022-02-18 18:40 ` Shakeel Butt
2022-02-18 19:07 ` Roman Gushchin
2022-02-21 14:30 ` Michal Hocko
2022-02-17 9:48 ` [PATCH v3 5/5] mm/memcg: Protect memcg_stock with a local_lock_t Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
2022-02-21 14:46 ` Michal Hocko
2022-02-21 15:19 ` Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
2022-02-21 16:24 ` Michal Hocko
2022-02-21 16:44 ` Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
2022-02-21 17:17 ` Michal Hocko
2022-02-21 17:25 ` Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20220217094802.3644569-4-bigeasy@linutronix.de \
--to=bigeasy@linutronix.de \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=cgroups@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=guro@fb.com \
--cc=hannes@cmpxchg.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=longman@redhat.com \
--cc=mhocko@kernel.org \
--cc=mkoutny@suse.com \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=vdavydov.dev@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox