linux-mm.kvack.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Naoya Horiguchi <naoya.horiguchi@linux.dev>
To: Miaohe Lin <linmiaohe@huawei.com>
Cc: akpm@linux-foundation.org, naoya.horiguchi@nec.com,
	linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 4/8] mm/memory-failure.c: remove unneeded orig_head
Date: Mon, 14 Feb 2022 23:50:19 +0900	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20220214145019.GD2624914@u2004> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20220210141733.1908-5-linmiaohe@huawei.com>

On Thu, Feb 10, 2022 at 10:17:29PM +0800, Miaohe Lin wrote:
> orig_head is used to check whether the page have changed compound pages
> during the locking. But it's always equal to hpage. So we can use hpage
> directly and remove this redundant one.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Miaohe Lin <linmiaohe@huawei.com>
> ---
>  mm/memory-failure.c | 5 ++---
>  1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/mm/memory-failure.c b/mm/memory-failure.c
> index 2dd7f35ee65a..4370c2f407c5 100644
> --- a/mm/memory-failure.c
> +++ b/mm/memory-failure.c
> @@ -1691,7 +1691,6 @@ int memory_failure(unsigned long pfn, int flags)
>  {
>  	struct page *p;
>  	struct page *hpage;
> -	struct page *orig_head;
>  	struct dev_pagemap *pgmap;
>  	int res = 0;
>  	unsigned long page_flags;
> @@ -1737,7 +1736,7 @@ int memory_failure(unsigned long pfn, int flags)
>  		goto unlock_mutex;
>  	}
> 
> -	orig_head = hpage = compound_head(p);
> +	hpage = compound_head(p);
>  	num_poisoned_pages_inc();
> 
>  	/*
> @@ -1821,7 +1820,7 @@ int memory_failure(unsigned long pfn, int flags)
>  	 * The page could have changed compound pages during the locking.
>  	 * If this happens just bail out.
>  	 */
> -	if (PageCompound(p) && compound_head(p) != orig_head) {
> +	if (PageCompound(p) && compound_head(p) != hpage) {

I think that this if-check was intended to detect the case that page p
belongs to a thp when memory_failure() is called and belongs to a compound
page in different size (like slab or some driver page) after the thp is
split.  But your suggestion makes me aware that the page p could be embedded
on a thp again after thp split.  I think this might be rare, but if it
happens the current if-check (or suggested one) cannot detect it.
So I feel that simply dropping compound_head() check might be better?

-	if (PageCompound(p) && compound_head(p) != orig_head) {
+	if (PageCompound(p)) {

This should ensure the assumption (mentioned in 8/8 patch) more that
the error page never belongs to compound page after taking page lock.

Thanks,
Naoya Horiguchi


  reply	other threads:[~2022-02-14 14:50 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 22+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2022-02-10 14:17 [PATCH 0/8] mm/memory-failure.c: A few cleanup patches for memory failure Miaohe Lin
2022-02-10 14:17 ` [PATCH 1/8] mm/memory-failure.c: minor clean up for memory_failure_dev_pagemap Miaohe Lin
2022-02-14 14:47   ` Naoya Horiguchi
2022-02-10 14:17 ` [PATCH 2/8] mm/memory-failure.c: avoid walking page table when vma_address() return -EFAULT Miaohe Lin
2022-02-14 14:48   ` Naoya Horiguchi
2022-02-15  2:40     ` Miaohe Lin
2022-02-15  8:37       ` HORIGUCHI NAOYA(堀口 直也)
2022-02-15  9:35         ` Miaohe Lin
2022-02-10 14:17 ` [PATCH 3/8] mm/memory-failure.c: rework the signaling logic in kill_proc Miaohe Lin
2022-02-14 14:48   ` Naoya Horiguchi
2022-02-10 14:17 ` [PATCH 4/8] mm/memory-failure.c: remove unneeded orig_head Miaohe Lin
2022-02-14 14:50   ` Naoya Horiguchi [this message]
2022-02-15  3:14     ` Miaohe Lin
2022-02-15  8:48       ` HORIGUCHI NAOYA(堀口 直也)
2022-02-15  9:28         ` Miaohe Lin
2022-02-10 14:17 ` [PATCH 5/8] mm/memory-failure.c: remove PageSlab check in hwpoison_filter_dev Miaohe Lin
2022-02-14 14:50   ` Naoya Horiguchi
2022-02-10 14:17 ` [PATCH 6/8] mm/memory-failure.c: rework the try_to_unmap logic in hwpoison_user_mappings() Miaohe Lin
2022-02-14 14:51   ` Naoya Horiguchi
2022-02-10 14:17 ` [PATCH 7/8] mm/memory-failure.c: remove obsolete comment in __soft_offline_page Miaohe Lin
2022-02-10 14:17 ` [PATCH 8/8] mm/memory-failure.c: remove unnecessary PageTransTail check Miaohe Lin
2022-02-14 14:54   ` Naoya Horiguchi

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20220214145019.GD2624914@u2004 \
    --to=naoya.horiguchi@linux.dev \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=linmiaohe@huawei.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
    --cc=naoya.horiguchi@nec.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox